JME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Molecular Endocrinology (2008) 41 165-175    DOI: 10.1677/JME-07-0145
© 2008 Society for Endocrinology

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
JME-07-0145v1
41/3/165    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martin, L. J
Right arrow Articles by Tremblay, J. J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Martin, L. J
Right arrow Articles by Tremblay, J. J

Glucocorticoids antagonize cAMP-induced Star transcription in Leydig cells through the orphan nuclear receptor NR4A1

Luc J Martin1 and Jacques J Tremblay1,2

1 Reproduction, Perinatal and Child Health, CHUQ Research Centre, CHUL Room T1-49, 2705 Laurier Boulevard, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada G1V 4G22 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Research in Biology of Reproduction, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada G1V 0A6

(Correspondence should be addressed to J J Tremblay; Email: jacques-j.tremblay{at}crchul.ulaval.ca)


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Declaration of interest
 Funding
 References
 
It is well established that stress, either physical or psychosocial, causes a decrease in testosterone production by Leydig cells. Glucocorticoids (Gc) are the main mediators of stress response and they convey their repressive effect on Leydig cells through the glucocorticoid receptor (GR). So far, various mechanisms have been proposed to explain the mechanism of action of Gc on Leydig cell steroidogenesis including repression of genes involved in testosterone biosynthesis. Several steroidogenic genes, including steroidogenic acute regulatory (STAR) protein, have been shown to be repressed by Gc in a GR-dependent manner but the underlying mechanisms remain to be fully elucidated. Here, we found that dexamethasone (Dex), a potent synthetic Gc, partly antagonizes the cAMP-dependent stimulation of the mouse Star promoter in MA-10 Leydig cells as revealed by transient transfection assays. This repression requires an element located at –95 bp previously implicated in the activation of the Star promoter by the nuclear receptors, NR4A1 and NR5A1. Dex was found to inhibit NR4A1-dependent transactivation of the Star promoter in Leydig cells by decreasing NR4A1, but not NR5A1, recruitment to the proximal Star promoter as determined by chromatin immunoprecipitation assay. Western blots revealed that Dex did not affect NR4A1 or NR5A1 expression in response to cAMP. These data suggest that NR4A1 would be associated with the GR in a transcriptionally inactive complex as previously demonstrated in pituitary corticotrope cells. Thus, our data provide new molecular insights into the stress-mediated suppression of testosterone production in testicular Leydig cells.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Declaration of interest
 Funding
 References
 
It is well recognized that elevated glucocorticoid (Gc) levels resulting from diverse stressful conditions lead to the suppression of serum testosterone (Hardy et al. 2005). Gc-mediated suppression of testosterone has profound physiological consequences, including muscular atrophy and sexual dysfunction (Charpenet et al. 1981, Cumming et al. 1983, Rabin et al. 1988, Contreras et al. 1996). In humans, elevated cortisol, the main circulating Gc, resulting from insulin-induced hypoglycaemia or Cushing's syndrome due to adrenal hyperplasia or adenoma, decreases serum testosterone content, with no alteration in pituitary luteinizing hormone (LH) levels (Gabrilove et al. 1974, Smals et al. 1977, Cumming et al. 1983, Vierhapper et al. 2000, Stikkelbroeck et al. 2001). A similar pattern is also observed in rats subjected to immobilization stress (Orr & Mann 1990, 1992, Orr et al. 1994, Dong et al. 2004) and psychosocial stress (Hardy et al. 2002). Further supporting the repressive role of Gc on testosterone production is the fact that the reduction of endogenous corticosterone levels (the main Gc in rodents) leads to increased testosterone production by Leydig cells (Gao et al. 1996).

Leydig cells express the Gc receptor (GR, NR3C1) and are the main targets of Gc action in the testis (Evain et al. 1976, Stalker et al. 1989, 1991, Schwarzenbach et al. 2003). Although the molecular mechanisms by which Gc decrease steroidogenesis have not been entirely defined, numerous studies have shown that Gc can inhibit expression of enzymes involved in testosterone biosynthesis such as Star, Cyp11a1, Cyp17a1, Hsd3b and Hsd17b3 (Hales & Payne 1989, Payne & Sha 1991, Wang et al. 2000, Huang & Shirley 2001, Schwarzenbach et al. 2003, Badrinarayanan et al. 2006, Fon & Li 2007). Interestingly, variations in serum Gc content have no significant effect on circulating levels of LH and on its binding properties to its receptor, indicating that Gc repressive effects on Leydig cell steroidogenic capacity are not mediated by an indirect effect on pituitary LH production (Orr & Mann 1990, Orr et al. 1994, Gao et al. 1996). In addition to repressing expression of steroidogenic enzyme-encoding genes, Gc were also reported to induce Leydig cell apoptosis (Gao et al. 2002, 2003, Wang & Gao 2006).

The initiation of steroid biosynthesis requires the transport of cholesterol from the outer to the inner mitochondrial membrane. This is mediated by a protein complex that comprises the steroidogenic acute regulatory (STAR) protein (reviewed in Manna & Stocco 2005). Mutations in the Star gene in humans (naturally occurring) and in mice (by genetic manipulations) cause male pseudohermaphroditism and lipoid congenital adrenal hyperplasia accompanied by a loss in steroid synthesis in the gonads and adrenal (reviewed in Stocco 2002). In Leydig cells, Star gene expression, and consequently steroidogenesis, is mainly regulated by LH-mediated activation of cAMP-dependent pathways ultimately leading to transcriptional activation (Ascoli et al. 2002). Several transcription factors including NR5A1 (SF1), GATA4, CEBPB, SREBF1, SP1, CREB1/CREM, FOS/JUN, and NR4A1 have been shown to activate Star promoter activity while NR0B1 (DAX1) represses it (reviewed in Stocco et al. 2001, Manna et al. 2003, Manna & Stocco 2005 and Ref. Martin et al. 2008). Of all these factors, the orphan nuclear receptor NR4A1 was shown to be rapidly and strongly induced in response to LH/cAMP in Leydig cells (Song et al. 2001, Martin & Tremblay 2005, Martin et al. 2008).

NR4A1 (NUR77, NGFI-B), along with NR4A2 (NURR1) and NR4A3 (NOR1), form a family of transcription factors that are characterized as immediate early response genes (Giguere 1999, Eells et al. 2000, Maxwell & Muscat 2005). Their expression is rapidly and strongly induced by various stimuli in numerous tissues, including hormonally stimulated steroidogenic cells (Davis & Lau 1994, Park et al. 2001, 2003, Song et al. 2001, Li et al. 2004, Martin & Tremblay 2005). NR4A1 transactivation potential is also modulated by post-translational modifications (Davis et al. 1993, Hirata et al. 1993, Li & Lau 1997, Wingate & Arthur 2006) and/or modulation of its intracellular localization in response to certain stimuli (Klopotowska et al. 2005). NR4A1 binds DNA as a monomer to the sequence AAAAGGTCA, called NR4A1 response element (NBRE), that is very similar to that recognized by the nuclear receptor steroidogenic factor 1 (NR5A1, SF1; Wilson et al. 1993), an essential regulator of expression of many steroidogenic genes (reviewed in Parker et al. 2002, Val et al. 2003). In Leydig cells, NR4A1 has been found to regulate genes involved in steroidogenesis (Zhang & Mellon 1997, Bassett et al. 2004, Hong et al. 2004, Havelock et al. 2005, Martin & Tremblay 2005), including Star (Martin et al. 2008).

Gc are known to directly modulate testosterone biosynthesis in Leydig cells through GR-mediated repression of genes encoding various components of the steroidogenic pathway. Gc-activated GR normally binds as a homodimer to a consensus DNA sequence GGTACAnnnTGTTCT called the Gc response element (GRE) found in the promoter region of target genes resulting in either transcriptional activation or repression (Schoneveld et al. 2004). The promoters of steroidogenic genes repressed by Gc, however, do not contain GREs, which strongly suggests an indirect mechanism. Here, we report that the repression of mouse Star promoter activity in Leydig cells by dexamethasone (Dex), a GR agonist, involves the nuclear receptor NR4A1. Dex-mediated repression of NR4A1- and cAMP-dependent activation of Star promoter activity was lost when a mutation was introduced in the NR4A1-responsive element at –95 bp. Finally, we show that Dex inhibits the recruitment of NR4A1, but not NR5A1, to the Star promoter.


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Declaration of interest
 Funding
 References
 
Chemicals

Dex and 8-Br-cAMP were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich Canada.

Plasmids

The –902 and –71 bp murine Star luciferase reporter constructs have been described previously (Tremblay & Viger 2001). The –902 bp Star reporter construct harbouring a mutation inactivating the NBRE/NR5A1 element at –95 bp (CATCCTTGA to CATAATTGA) has been described previously (Martin et al. 2008). Expression vectors for NR4A1 and GR (Philips et al. 1997a) were provided by Dr Jacques Drouin (Laboratoire de Génétique Moléculaire, Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal, Montréal, Canada).

Cell culture and transfections

Mouse MA-10 Leydig cells (Ascoli 1981) were provided by Dr Mario Ascoli (University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA). MA-10 Leydig cells were grown in Waymouth's MB752/1 medium supplemented with 1.2 g/l NaHCO3, 15% horse serum and 50 mg/l gentamycin and streptomycin sulphate, at 37 °C in 5% CO2 and transfected as described previously (Martin et al. 2008). In experiments involving hormonal treatment, cells were treated with 0.5 mM 8-Br-cAMP for 4 h prior to harvesting in the absence or the presence of Dex (100 nM) that was added 30 min before cAMP. Data reported represent the average of at least three experiments, each performed in duplicate.

Protein purification and western blots

MA-10 Leydig cells were incubated in serum-free medium and treated with either vehicle or Dex (100 nM) for 30 min before addition of 0.5 mM 8-Br-cAMP for 2 or 4 h. MA-10 Leydig cells were then rinsed twice with ice cold PBS and nuclear proteins were isolated according to the procedure outlined by Schreiber et al. (1989). Protein concentrations were estimated using standard Bradford assay. In a denaturing loading buffer, 20 µg aliquots of nuclear proteins were boiled for 10 min, fractionated by SDS-PAGE and transferred onto Polyvinylidene Fluoride membrane (Millipore, Bedford, USA). Immunodetection was performed using an avidin–biotin approach according to the manufacturer's instructions (Vector Laboratories Inc., Ontario, Canada). The detection of NR4A1, NR5A1, LMNB1 (which serves as a loading control) was performed using a monoclonal anti-NR4A1 antibody (1:500 dilution; BD Biosciences Pharmingen, San Diego, CA, USA), a polyclonal anti-NR5A1 antibody (1:2000 dilution; ABR-Affinity BioReagents, Golden, CO, USA) and a polyclonal anti-LMNB1 antibody (1:200 dilution; Santa Cruz Biotechnologies, Santa Cruz, USA).

RNA isolation, reverse transcription and quantitative real-time PCR

Total RNA was isolated from MA-10 Leydig cells using RNeasy Plus extraction kit (Qiagen Inc). First-strand cDNAs were synthesized from a 1 µg aliquot of the various RNAs using the Transcriptor Reverse Transcriptase System (Roche Diagnostics). MA-10 Leydig cells were grown in serum-free medium containing either vehicle or 100 nM Dex for 30 min before addition of 0.5 mM 8-Br-cAMP for the indicated time prior to RNA isolation. Quantitative real-time PCR was performed using a LightCycler 1.5 instrument and the LightCycler FastStart DNA Master SYBR Green I kit (Roche Diagnostics) according to the manufacturer's protocol. PCRs were performed using the following Star -specific primers: forward, 5'-TTG GGC ATA CTC AAC AAC CA-3' and reverse, 5'-CCT TGA CAT TTG GGT TCC AC-3'. As an internal control, PCRs were performed using previously described Rpl19-specific primers (Guigon et al. 2005). The PCRs were done using the following conditions: 10 min at 95 °C followed by 35 cycles of denaturation (5 s at 95 °C), annealing (5 s at 62 °C for both Rpl19 and Star cDNAs) and extension (20 s at 72 °C) with single acquisition of fluorescence at the end of each extension steps. The specificity of PCR products was confirmed by analysis of the melting curve and agarose gel electrophoresis. Quantification of gene expression was performed using the Relative Quantification Software (Roche Diagnostics) and is expressed as a ratio of Star to Rpl19 mRNA levels.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay

ChIP assays were performed as described previously (Robert et al. 2006). The genomic DNA immunoprecipitated with the NR4A1 or NR5A1 antisera was directly analysed by quantitative real-time PCR using primers specific for the proximal region (–299 bp to –41 bp) of the mouse Star promoter (forward: 5'-TGA TGC ACC TCA GTT ACT GG-3' and reverse 5'-GCT GTG CAT CAT CAC TTG AG-3'). The conditions were as follows: 10 min at 95 °C followed by 35 cycles of denaturation (5 s at 95 °C), annealing (5 s at 62 °C) and extension (20 s at 72 °C) with single acquisition of fluorescence at the end of each extension step. Absolute quantification of Star promoter DNA fragments immunoprecipitated with the NR4A1 or NR5A1 antisera was performed using a standard curve generated with known concentrations of the –902 bp Star promoter construct and is expressed as a ratio of Star promoter immunoprecipitated DNA to input DNA levels. Input DNA represents 5% of total DNA used for a ChIP experiment.

Statistical analyses

To identify significant differences within multiple groups, statistical analyses were done using one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's multiple comparison test. Comparisons between two groups were done using Mann–Whitney U test. For all statistical analyses, P<0.05 was considered significant. All statistical analyses were done using the SigmaStat software package (Systat Software Inc., San Jose, CA, USA).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Declaration of interest
 Funding
 References
 
Gc repress cAMP-mediated induction of Star expression in Leydig cells

We first quantified by real-time PCR the effect of Dex, a potent synthetic Gc, on Star expression in response to cAMP stimulation in a time-dependent manner in MA-10 Leydig cells. As expected, Star mRNA levels were robustly increased in response to cAMP in a time-dependent manner (Fig. 1, open bars). In the presence of Dex, however, the cAMP-mediated induction of Star mRNA was significantly repressed by 35% at 4 and 6 h (Fig. 1, solid bars), while the reduction observed at 2 h was not statistically significant (P=0.08).


Figure 1
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1 Dex inhibits cAMP-induced Star expression in Leydig cells. MA-10 Leydig cells were treated with 8-Br-cAMP (0.5 mM) in the presence or absence of Dex (100 nM) for the indicated times and total RNA was isolated and used in quantitative real-time PCR using primers specific for Star cDNA as described in Materials and methods. Results were corrected with the Rpl19 cDNA. Results are the mean of three individual experiments performed in duplicate (±S.E.M). *P<0.03.

 
Gc antagonize NR4A1- and cAMP-dependent activation of the mouse Star promoter

Since Gc can repress gene expression by antagonizing NR4A1-dependent transactivation in the pituitary (Philips et al. 1997b, Martens et al. 2005), and since we have found that NR4A1 can activate the mouse Star promoter (Martin et al. 2008), we tested whether Dex could inhibit NR4A1 action on the mouse Star promoter in the MA-10 Leydig cells. The treatment of MA-10 Leydig cells with Dex alone in the absence of any stimulation had no effect on the activity of a –902 bp mouse Star reporter construct (Fig. 2A). NR4A1 transactivated the Star reporter construct by about threefold and this activation was significantly repressed by 21% by Dex in MA-10 Leydig cells (Fig. 2A). Similarly, the treatment of MA-10 Leydig cells with 8-Br-cAMP led to a fivefold activation of the Star promoter that was repressed by 38% by Dex (Fig. 2B). Combination of NR4A1 and cAMP, which further enhances Star promoter activation, was also repressed by Dex (Fig. 2B). Because Gc repressive effects are known to be mediated through GR (Bambino & Hsueh 1981, Huang & Shirley 2001), we speculated that the overexpression of this receptor might enhance the effect of Dex. We therefore performed the same experiments in the presence of an expression vector encoding GR. We found that Dex-mediated repression of NR4A1- (Fig. 3A) and cAMP-stimulated (Fig. 3B) Star promoter activity was more robust in the presence of GR and reached 50% when both NR4A1 and cAMP were combined (Fig. 3B). These results further support the implication of GR in the Dex-mediated repression of Star promoter activity. The inhibitory effect of Dex on the NR4A1- and cAMP-mediated activation of Star transcription was found to be specific since it was lost when a minimal Star reporter construct (–71 bp) was used (Fig. 4). The weak but significant NR4A1- and cAMP-dependent activation of the –71 bp Star promoter construct may be attributed to the presence of other regulatory elements including a NR5A1 binding element at –45 bp (Fig. 4).


Figure 2
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2 Dex represses NR4A1 and cAMP-induced Star promoter activity. Repression by Dex of the (A) NR4A1- and (B) cAMP-dependent activation of the Star promoter. MA-10 Leydig cells were co-transfected with a –902 to +17 bp mouse Star reporter construct along with either an empty expression vector or an expression vector (250 ng) for NR4A1 as indicated. Cells were treated with 100 nM Dex and/or 0.5 mM 8-Br-cAMP 4 h before harvesting. The number of experiments, each performed in duplicate, is indicated. Results are shown as fold activation over control (±S.E.M). A different letter indicates a statistically significant difference. In (A), P<0.0001 except between groups b and c where P=0.0035. In (B), P≤0.0002 except between groups b and c, where P=0.0481 and groups d and b where P=0.0318. A schematic of the mouse Star promoter (–902 to +17 bp) with the position of the NR5A1 (grey box), NBRE/NR5A1 (black box) and AP-1 (hatched box) elements is shown on top.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3 Effect of GR on the Dex-mediated repression of Star promoter activity. Repression by Dex of the (A) NR4A1- and (B) cAMP-dependent activation of the Star promoter is studied in the presence of GR. MA-10 Leydig cells were co-transfected with a –902 to +17 bp mouse Star reporter construct along with either an empty expression vector or expression vectors (250 ng) for NR4A1 and/or GR as indicated. Cells were treated with 100 nM Dex and/or 0.5 mM 8-Br-cAMP as indicated for 4 h before harvesting. The number of experiments, each performed in duplicate, is indicated. Results are shown as fold activation over control (±S.E.M). A different letter indicates a statistically significant difference. In (A), P<0.0001 except between groups b and c where P=0.0291. In (B), P<0.0001 except between groups b and c where P=0.0108. A schematic of the mouse Star promoter (–902 to +17 bp) with the position of the NR5A1 (grey box), NBRE/NR5A1 (black box) and AP-1 (hatched box) elements is shown on top.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4 The minimal Star promoter is unresponsive to Dex/GR. MA-10 Leydig cells were co-transfected and treated as described in Fig. 2 (for A and B) and in Fig. 3 (for C and D) except that a –71 to +17 bp mouse Star reporter construct was used. The number of experiments, each performed in duplicate, is indicated. Results are shown as fold activation over control (±S.E.M). A different letter indicates a statistically significant difference. In (A) P≤0.0499 and in (B) P≤0.0044. A schematic of the mouse Star promoter (–71 to +17 bp) with the position of the remaining NR5A1 (grey box) element is shown on top.

 
Dex-mediated repression requires an intact element at –95 bp

We have recently found that NR4A1-dependent activation of the Star promoter requires an intact NBRE/NR5A1 element at –95 bp (Martin et al. 2008). We therefore tested whether this element might be involved in the repression by Dex/GR of the NR4A1/cAMP-stimulated mouse Star promoter in Leydig cells. As shown in Fig. 5A, a –902 bp mouse Star promoter construct harbouring a two nucleotide mutation in the –95 bp NBRE/NR5A1 element was no longer activated by NR4A1 and the repressive effect by Dex/GR was lost. Although this mutated Star construct could still be activated by cAMP – most likely through other regulatory elements for transcription factors such as NR5A1, GATA4, CEBPB and AP-1 known to be involved in cAMP-dependent regulation of the Star transcription (reviewed in Manna et al. 2003) – the repression by Dex/GR was completely abolished (Fig. 5B). In terms of repression by Dex, the -902 bp reporter construct that contains a mutation in the NBRE/NR5A1 element at –95 bp behaved exactly as the minimal –71 bp Star reporter (Fig. 4). Altogether, these results indicate that an intact NBRE/NR5A1 element at –95 bp is essential for the Dex/GR-mediated repression of the NR4A1/cAMP-induced Star promoter activity.


Figure 5
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 5 Repression of NR4A1/cAMP-dependent activation of the Star promoter by Dex/GR requires an intact –95 bp NBRE/NR5A1 element. Repression of (A) NR4A1- and (B) cAMP-dependent activation of the Star promoter by Dex/GR were studied by co-transfection of MA-10 Leydig cells with a –902 to +17 bp mouse Star reporter construct harbouring a two nucleotide mutation in the –95 bp NBRE/NR5A1 element (Materials and methods) along with either an empty expression vector or expression vectors (250 ng) for NR4A1 and/or GR as indicated. Cells were treated with 100 nM Dex and/or 0.5 mM 8-Br-cAMP for 4 h as indicated before harvesting. The number of experiments, each performed in duplicate, is indicated. Results are shown as fold activation over control (±S.E.M). A different letter indicates a statistically significant difference (P≤0.0022). A schematic of the mutated mouse Star promoter (–902 to +17 bp) with the position of the NR5A1 (grey box), NBRE/NR5A1 (mutation depicted by a large X) and AP-1 (hatched box) elements is shown on top.

 
Dex decreases NR4A1 recruitment to the proximal Star promoter in response to cAMP

Because the –95 bp element, which we found to be essential for the Dex repressive effects on the Star promoter (Fig. 5), is important for NR4A1- and NR5A1-mediated transactivation of the Star promoter, we hypothesized that Dex/GR might target these transcription factors. We first tested whether the repression by Dex/GR could be attributed to a decrease in NR4A1 and NR5A1 protein levels. As shown in Fig. 6, western blots revealed that Dex had no significant effect on the cAMP-induced NR4A1 protein level (Fig. 6, top panel) and NR5A1 protein level (Fig. 6, middle panel). Another mechanism by which Dex/GR could repress Star transcription is by inhibiting the recruitment of NR4A1 and/or NR5A1 to the proximal Star promoter via protein–protein interactions. In support of this is the fact that activated GR was previously shown to interact with NR4A1 in pituitary corticotrope cells thus preventing its binding to the Pomc promoter (Philips et al. 1997b, Martens et al. 2005) and with NR5A1 in adrenal cells (Ito et al. 1997, Gummow et al. 2006). To begin testing whether Dex/GR could inhibit recruitment of NR4A1 or NR5A1 to the Star promoter, we first performed ChIP followed by quantitative real-time PCR to determine the temporal association of each factor with the proximal Star promoter in MA-10 Leydig cells in response to cAMP stimulation. As shown in Fig. 7A, a significant increase in NR4A1 association with the proximal Star promoter was detected 1 h after cAMP stimulation, peaked at 2 h and decreased at 4 h. A modest but significant increase in NR5A1 recruitment to the proximal Star promoter was observed 2 h post cAMP treatment (Fig. 7A), which is similar to what has been previously reported for NR5A1 (Hiroi et al. 2004). Thus, both NR4A1 and NR5A1 are associated with the proximal Star promoter in Leydig cells in a non-exclusive manner. The same methodology was next used to evaluate the impact of Dex/GR on the cAMP-induced recruitment of NR4A1 and NR5A1 to the proximal Star promoter in MA-10 Leydig cells. As shown in Fig. 7B, Dex significantly inhibited by about 55% the cAMP-induced recruitment of NR4A1 to the Star promoter while having no effect on NR5A1 binding to the proximal Star promoter in the absence or presence of cAMP (Fig. 7C). All together, these findings suggest a mechanism where Dex/GR would repress Star transcription, at least in part, by decreasing NR4A1 recruitment to the proximal Star promoter.


Figure 6
View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 6 Expression of NR4A1 and NR5A1 is not affected by Dex. MA-10 Leydig cells were treated with vehicle (–), 0.5 mM 8-Br-cAMP and/or 100 nM Dex for 2 and 4 h as indicated. Nuclear extracts were prepared, separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membrane. NR4A1 (top panel) and NR5A1 (middle panel) were immunodetected using antisera specific for NR4A1 and NR5A1. The experiment was repeated thrice and produced identical results. Immunodetection of LMNB1 (lower panel) was used as a loading control.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 7 Recruitment of NR4A1 to the proximal Star promoter is inhibited by Dex. (A) Time-dependent recruitment of NR4A1 and NR5A1 to the proximal Star promoter in response to cAMP. MA-10 Leydig cells were treated with 0.5 mM 8-Br-cAMP for the indicated time and ChIP assays were performed. Chromatin was immunoprecipitated with either a NR4A1 (square) or NR5A1 (triangle) antiserum. An IgG was used as control (diamond). For a given time point, asterisks indicate a statistically significant difference in cAMP between treated and untreated. *P<0.0001, **P=0.0023, ***P=0.0275. (B and C) Dex inhibits NR4A1 recruitment to the Star promoter. Association of (B) NR4A1 and (C) NR5A1 to the proximal mouse Star promoter was determined by ChIP assay using MA-10 Leydig cells treated with vehicle (–), 0.5 mM 8-Br-cAMP and/or 100 nM Dex as indicated. A different letter indicates a statistically significant difference. In (B), P≤0.0003 except between groups a and c where P=0.0022. In (C), P=0.0024. In (A), (B) and (C), a 258 bp fragment of the proximal Star promoter encompassing the –95 bp NBRE/NR5A1 element was amplified by real-time PCR immediately following the ChIP assay. An aliquot (5%) of chromatin preparation before immunoprecipitation (input) was used as positive control. Results are presented as a ratio of Star promoter immunoprecipitated DNA to input DNA levels from three independent experiments (±S.E.M).

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Declaration of interest
 Funding
 References
 
Leydig cells normally regulate their intracellular concentration of Gc levels by the action of two Gc metabolizing enzymes, HSD11B1 and -2, both of which are present in these cells (Ge et al. 1997, 2005). Testosterone production can therefore be maintained under normal serum concentrations of Gc that are inactivated by the oxidative activity of HSD11B1 into biologically inert 11-dehydro-Gc (Ge et al. 2005). Under stressful conditions, however, the oxidative capacity of HSD11B1 in Leydig cells is exceeded by high levels of Gc leading to suppression of testosterone biosynthesis (Gao et al. 1996, Ge et al. 1997).

As for many physiological events, several mechanisms, which are not mutually exclusive, have been put forward to explain the effects of GR-dependent stress-mediated decrease in testosterone production by Leydig cells. For instance, Gc were reported to initiate Leydig cell apoptosis (Gao et al. 2002) with the involvement of two transcription factors, NFKB1 and NFATC1 (Wang & Gao 2006, Chai et al. 2007). The nuclear receptor NR4A1 has also been associated with apoptosis in other cell types. Interaction between NR4A1 and the retinoid X receptor (RXR) induces translocation of NR4A1 to the mitochondria where it interacts with BCL2 and converts it from an anti-apoptotic to a pro-apoptotic factor (Katagiri et al. 2000, Cao et al. 2004, Lin et al. 2004). Our current data, however, do not support a role for NR4A1 in the initiation of apoptosis in Leydig cells as a result of Gc exposure since NR4A1 protein levels in the nucleus were normally increased following cAMP stimulation and were not affected by Dex treatment.

Another mechanism by which Gc inhibit steroidogenesis is through repression of genes involved in steroid biosynthesis. Among those is Star that was shown to be repressed by Gc both at the mRNA and protein levels in testicular Leydig cells, ovarian follicles and adrenal cells (Wang et al. 2000, Huang & Shirley 2001, Schwarzenbach et al. 2003, Yu & Li 2006, Fon & Li 2007). We found that Dex, a synthetic Gc, repressed cAMP-induced, but not basal, Star expression in MA-10 Leydig cells, which is in agreement with previous studies reporting that Dex has no effect on basal Star expression (Huang & Shirley 2001, Schwarzenbach et al. 2003). Although the underlying molecular mechanisms remain to be fully elucidated, Bambino & Hsueh (1981) have demonstrated that Dex-mediated repression of testosterone production is a GR-dependent event. The importance of GR in the transcriptional repression of Star by Gc was further underscored by the use of RU486, a potent antagonist of Gc action known to bind to GR with high affinity (Beck et al. 1993), which has been shown to stimulate Star expression in testicular Leydig cells (Schwarzenbach et al. 2003) and in the ovary (Huang & Shirley 2001). Activated GR regulates transcription either by binding to GRE in the regulatory region of target genes or through protein–protein interaction with DNA-bound transcription factors (reviewed in Kassel & Herrlich 2007). Consistent with the fact that the Star promoter lacks a consensus GRE (Caron et al. 1997, Wooton-Kee & Clark 2000), we found that part of the Dex-mediated repression of mouse Star promoter activity in Leydig cells involves the nuclear receptor NR4A1, which we have recently identified as a regulator of Star transcription in these cells (Martin et al. 2008).

Our present data suggest that part of the repression is likely mediated through a direct protein–protein interaction between activated GR and NR4A1 into a transcriptionally inactive complex. This is supported by the fact that Dex significantly decreased NR4A1 association with the mouse Star promoter in a native chromatin environment in Leydig cells, while NR5A1 recruitment was unaffected. This was not due to a decrease in transcription factor levels since Dex did not affect NR4A1 and NR5A1 protein levels, which is in agreement with a previous report for NR5A1 (Yu & Li 2006). A similar transcriptionally inactive GR/ NR4A1 interaction has been previously reported in pituitary corticotrope cells, where Gc repress expression of the Pomc gene (Philips et al. 1997b, Martens et al. 2005). Another mechanism by which Dex could repress cAMP-induced Star transcription is through the modulation of coactivator/corepressor recruitment. Dex was recently reported to inhibit the cAMP-mediated increase in the association of acetylated histone H3, a marker of active gene transcription, with the proximal Star promoter (Christenson et al. 2001, Hiroi et al. 2004, Fon & Li 2007). Furthermore, inhibition of Star mRNA and protein levels in the testis of Dex-treated rats was found to be correlated with increased expression of the atypical nuclear receptor NR0B1 (Yu & Li 2006), which is known to be associated with corepressors and to repress gene expression (Crawford et al. 1999, Altincicek et al. 2000). NR0B1 can also interact with NR4A1 and NR5A1, both activators of Star expression, leading to the repression of their transactivation properties (Ito et al. 1997, Song et al. 2004, Yu & Li 2006). Expression of GIOT-1, another repressor found in Leydig cells, is upregulated by NR4A1 in response to LH/cAMP (Song et al. 2006). GIOT-1 was shown to act as a repressor of NR5A1-mediated activation of the Cyp17a1 promoter (Song et al. 2006). It is therefore possible that the NR0B1 and GIOT-1 repressor, through their interaction with NR4A1 and NR5A1, might also contribute to the Dex-mediated inhibition of cAMP-induced Star expression in Leydig cells.

Although we found a role for NR4A1 in Dex-mediated repression of cAMP-induced Star transcription, other transcription factors are also involved in this process. This is supported by the fact that the Dex-mediated repression was more important when 8-Br-cAMP was used compared with NR4A1 that is consistent with the fact that cAMP activates several transcription factors in addition to NR4A1 in Leydig cells. Additional studies are required to identify these factors to ultimately better understand how stress inhibits Star gene expression and testosterone production in Leydig cells.


    Declaration of interest
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Declaration of interest
 Funding
 References
 
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that would prejudice their impartiality.


    Funding
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Declaration of interest
 Funding
 References
 
L J M is supported by doctoral studentships from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and from Fonds de la recherche en santé du Québec. J J T holds a New Investigator scholarship from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). This work was funded by grants from NSERC (262224-2003) and CIHR (MOP-81387) to J J T.


    Acknowledgements
 
We would like to thank Dr Jacques Drouin and Dr Mario Ascoli for generously providing expression plasmids and cell line used in this study.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Declaration of interest
 Funding
 References
 
Altincicek B, Tenbaum SP, Dressel U, Thormeyer D, Renkawitz R & Baniahmad A 2000 Interaction of the corepressor Alien with DAX-1 is abrogated by mutations of DAX-1 involved in adrenal hypoplasia congenita. Journal of Biological Chemistry 275 7662–7667.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ascoli M 1981 Characterization of several clonal lines of cultured Leydig tumor cells: gonadotropin receptors and steroidogenic responses. Endocrinology 108 88–95.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ascoli M, Fanelli F & Segaloff DL 2002 The lutropin/choriogonadotropin receptor, a 2002 perspective. Endocrine Reviews 23 141–174.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Badrinarayanan R, Rengarajan S, Nithya P & Balasubramanian K 2006 Corticosterone impairs the mRNA expression and activity of 3β- and 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases in adult rat Leydig cells. Biochemistry and Cell Biology 84 745–754.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Bambino TH & Hsueh AJ 1981 Direct inhibitory effect of glucocorticoids upon testicular luteinizing hormone receptor and steroidogenesis in vivo and in vitro. Endocrinology 108 2142–2148.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bassett MH, Suzuki T, Sasano H, De Vries CJ, Jimenez PT, Carr BR & Rainey WE 2004 The orphan nuclear receptor NGFIB regulates transcription of 3beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase. Implications for the control of adrenal functional zonation. Journal of Biological Chemistry 279 37622–37630.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Beck CA, Estes PA, Bona BJ, Muro-Cacho CA, Nordeen SK & Edwards DP 1993 The steroid antagonist RU486 exerts different effects on the glucocorticoid and progesterone receptors. Endocrinology 133 728–740.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Cao X, Liu W, Lin F, Li H, Kolluri SK, Lin B, Han YH, Dawson MI & Zhang XK 2004 Retinoid X receptor regulates Nur77/TR3-dependent apoptosis by modulating its nuclear export and mitochondrial targeting. Molecular and Cellular Biology 24 9705–9725.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Caron KM, Ikeda Y, Soo SC, Stocco DM, Parker KL & Clark BJ 1997 Characterization of the promoter region of the mouse gene encoding the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein. Molecular Endocrinology 11 138–147.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chai WR, Wang Q & Gao HB 2007 NFAT2 is implicated in corticosterone-induced rat Leydig cell apoptosis. Asian Journal of Andrology 9 623–633.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Charpenet G, Tache Y, Forest MG, Haour F, Saez JM, Bernier M, Ducharme JR & Collu R 1981 Effects of chronic intermittent immobilization stress on rat testicular androgenic function. Endocrinology 109 1254–1258.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Christenson LK, Stouffer RL & Strauss JF III 2001 Quantitative analysis of the hormone-induced hyperacetylation of histone H3 associated with the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein gene promoter. Journal of Biological Chemistry 276 27392–27399.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Contreras LN, Masini AM, Danna MM, Kral M, Bruno OD, Rossi MA & Andrada JA 1996 Glucocorticoids: their role on gonadal function and LH secretion. Minerva Endocrinologica 21 43–46.[Medline]

Crawford PA, Dorn C, Sadovsky Y & Milbrandt J 1999 Nuclear receptor DAX-1 recruits nuclear receptor corepressor N-CoR to steroidogenic factor 1. Molecular and Cellular Biology 18 2949–2956.[Web of Science]

Cumming DC, Quigley ME & Yen SS 1983 Acute suppression of circulating testosterone levels by cortisol in men. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 57 671–673.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Davis IJ & Lau LF 1994 Endocrine and neurogenic regulation of the orphan nuclear receptors Nur77 and Nurr-1 in the adrenal glands. Molecular and Cellular Biology 14 3469–3483.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Davis IJ, Hazel TG, Chen RH, Blenis J & Lau LF 1993 Functional domains and phosphorylation of the orphan receptor Nur77. Molecular Endocrinology 7 953–964.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Dong Q, Salva A, Sottas CM, Niu E, Holmes M & Hardy MP 2004 Rapid glucocorticoid mediation of suppressed testosterone biosynthesis in male mice subjected to immobilization stress. Journal of Andrology 25 973–981.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Eells JB, Witta J, Otridge JB, Zuffova E & Nikodem VM 2000 Structure and function of the Nur77 receptor subfamily, a unique class of hormone nuclear receptor. Current Genomics 1 135–152.[CrossRef]

Evain D, Morera AM & Saez JM 1976 Glucocorticoid receptors in interstitial cells of the rat testis. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry 7 1135–1139.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Fon WP & Li PH 2007 Dexamethasone-induced suppression of steroidogenic acute regulatory protein gene expression in mouse Y-1 adrenocortical cells is associated with reduced histone H3 acetylation. Endocrine 32 155–165.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Gabrilove JL, Nicolis GL & Sohval AR 1974 The testis in Cushing's syndrome. Journal of Urology 112 95–99.[Web of Science][Medline]

Gao HB, Shan LX, Monder C & Hardy MP 1996 Suppression of endogenous corticosterone levels in vivo increases the steroidogenic capacity of purified rat Leydig cells in vitro. Endocrinology 137 1714–1718.[Abstract]

Gao HB, Tong MH, Hu YQ, Guo QS, Ge R & Hardy MP 2002 Glucocorticoid induces apoptosis in rat leydig cells. Endocrinology 143 130–138.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gao HB, Tong MH, Hu YQ, You HY, Guo QS, Ge RS & Hardy MP 2003 Mechanisms of glucocorticoid-induced Leydig cell apoptosis. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 199 153–163.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Ge RS, Hardy DO, Catterall JF & Hardy MP 1997 Developmental changes in glucocorticoid receptor and 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase oxidative and reductive activities in rat Leydig cells. Endocrinology 138 5089–5095.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ge RS, Dong Q, Niu EM, Sottas CM, Hardy DO, Catterall JF, Latif SA, Morris DJ & Hardy MP 2005 11β-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 2 in rat leydig cells: its role in blunting glucocorticoid action at physiological levels of substrate. Endocrinology 146 2657–2664.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Giguere V 1999 Orphan nuclear receptors: from gene to function. Endocrine Reviews 20 689–725.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Guigon CJ, Coudouel N, Mazaud-Guittot S, Forest MG & Magre S 2005 Follicular cells acquire sertoli cell characteristics after oocyte loss. Endocrinology 146 2992–3004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Gummow BM, Scheys JO, Cancelli VR & Hammer GD 2006 Reciprocal regulation of a glucocorticoid receptor-steroidogenic factor-1 transcription complex on the Dax-1 promoter by glucocorticoids and adrenocorticotropic hormone in the adrenal cortex. Molecular Endocrinology 20 2711–2723.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hales DB & Payne AH 1989 Glucocorticoid-mediated repression of P450scc mRNA and de novo synthesis in cultured Leydig cells. Endocrinology 124 2099–2104.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hardy MP, Sottas CM, Ge R, McKittrick CR, Tamashiro KL, McEwen BS, Haider SG, Markham CM, Blanchard RJ, Blanchard DC et al. 2002 Trends of reproductive hormones in male rats during psychosocial stress: role of glucocorticoid metabolism in behavioral dominance. Biology of Reproduction 67 1750–1755.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hardy MP, Gao HB, Dong Q, Ge R, Wang Q, Chai WR, Feng X & Sottas C 2005 Stress hormone and male reproductive function. Cell and Tissue Research 322 147–153.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Havelock JC, Smith AL, Seely JB, Dooley CA, Rodgers RJ, Rainey WE & Carr BR 2005 The NGFI-B family of transcription factors regulates expression of 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 in the human ovary. Molecular Human Reproduction 11 79–85.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hirata Y, Kiuchi K, Chen HC, Milbrandt J & Guroff G 1993 The phosphorylation and DNA binding of the DNA-binding domain of the orphan nuclear receptor NGFI-B. Journal of Biological Chemistry 268 24808–24812.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hiroi H, Christenson LK, Chang L, Sammel MD, Berger SL & Strauss JF III 2004 Temporal and spatial changes in transcription factor binding and histone modifications at the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (stAR) locus associated with stAR transcription. Molecular Endocrinology 18 791–806.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hong CY, Park JH, Ahn RS, Im SY, Choi HS, Soh J, Mellon SH & Lee K 2004 Molecular mechanism of suppression of testicular steroidogenesis by proinflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor alpha. Molecular and Cellular Biology 24 2593–2604.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Huang TJ & Shirley LP 2001 Dexamethasone inhibits luteinizing hormone-induced synthesis of steroidogenic acute regulatory protein in cultured rat preovulatory follicles. Biology of Reproduction 64 163–170.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ito M, Yu R & Jameson JL 1997 DAX-1 inhibits SF-1-mediated transactivation via a carboxy-terminal domain that is deleted in adrenal hypoplasia congenita. Molecular and Cellular Biology 17 1476–1483.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kassel O & Herrlich P 2007 Crosstalk between the glucocorticoid receptor and other transcription factors: molecular aspects. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 275 13–29.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Katagiri Y, Takeda K, Yu ZX, Ferrans VJ, Ozato K & Guroff G 2000 Modulation of retinoid signalling through NGF-induced nuclear export of NGFI-B. Nature Cell Biology 2 435–440.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Klopotowska D, Matuszyk J, Rapak A, Gidzinska B, Cebrat M, Ziolo E & Strzadala L 2005 Transactivation activity of Nur77 discriminates between Ca2+ and cAMP signals. Neurochemistry International 46 305–312.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Li Y & Lau LF 1997 Adrenocorticotropic hormone regulates the activities of the orphan nuclear receptor Nur77 through modulation of phosphorylation. Endocrinology 138 4138–4146.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Li W, Amri H, Huang H, Wu C & Papadopoulos V 2004 Gene and protein profiling of the response of MA-10 Leydig tumor cells to human chorionic gonadotropin. Journal of Andrology 25 900–913.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lin B, Kolluri SK, Lin F, Liu W, Han YH, Cao X, Dawson MI, Reed JC & Zhang XK 2004 Conversion of BCL2 from protector to killer by interaction with nuclear orphan receptor Nur77/TR3. Cell 116 527–540.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Manna PR & Stocco DM 2005 Regulation of the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein expression: functional and physiological consequences. Current Drug Targets. Immune, Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders 5 93–108.[CrossRef]

Manna PR, Wang XJ & Stocco DM 2003 Involvement of multiple transcription factors in the regulation of steroidogenic acute regulatory protein gene expression. Steroids 68 1125–1134.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Martens C, Bilodeau S, Maira M, Gauthier Y & Drouin J 2005 Protein–protein interactions and transcriptional antagonism between the subfamily of NGFI-B/Nur77 orphan nuclear receptors and glucocorticoid receptor. Molecular Endocrinology 19 885–897.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Martin LJ & Tremblay JJ 2005 The human 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase/{Delta}5-{Delta}4 isomerase type 2 promoter is a novel target for the immediate early orphan nuclear receptor Nur77 in steroidogenic cells. Endocrinology 146 861–869.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Martin LJ, Boucher N, Brousseau C & Tremblay JJThe orphan nuclear receptor NUR77 regulates hormone-induced StAR transcription in Leydig cells through a cooperation with CaMKIdoi: 10.1210/me.2007-0370Molecular Endocrinology 2008

Maxwell MA & Muscat GE 2005 The NR4A subgroup: immediate early response genes with pleiotropic physiological roles. Nuclear Receptor Signaling 4 1–8.

Orr TE & Mann DR 1990 Effects of restraint stress on plasma LH and testosterone concentrations, Leydig cell LH/hCG receptors, and in vitro testicular steroidogenesis in adult rats. Hormones and Behavior 24 324–341.[CrossRef][Medline]

Orr TE & Mann DR 1992 Role of glucocorticoids in the stress-induced suppression of testicular steroidogenesis in adult male rats. Hormones and Behavior 26 350–363.[CrossRef][Medline]

Orr TE, Taylor MF, Bhattacharyya AK, Collins DC & Mann DR 1994 Acute immobilization stress disrupts testicular steroidogenesis in adult male rats by inhibiting the activities of 17 {alpha}-hydroxylase and 17,20-lyase without affecting the binding of LH/hCG receptors. Journal of Andrology 15 302–308.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Park JI, Park HJ, Choi HS, Lee K, Lee WK & Chun SY 2001 Gonadotropin regulation of NGFI-B messenger ribonucleic acid expression during ovarian follicle development in the rat. Endocrinology 142 3051–3059.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Park JI, Park HJ, Lee YI, Seo YM & Chun SY 2003 Regulation of NGFI-B expression during the ovulatory process. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 202 25–29.[Web of Science][Medline]

Parker KL, Rice DA, Lala DS, Ikeda Y, Luo X, Wong M, Bakke M, Zhao L, Frigeri C, Hanley NA et al. 2002 Steroidogenic factor 1: an essential mediator of endocrine development. Recent Progress in Hormone Research 57 19–36.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Payne AH & Sha LL 1991 Multiple mechanisms for regulation of 3 β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase/{delta} 5-{delta} 4-isomerase, 17 alpha-hydroxylase/C17-20 lyase cytochrome P450, and cholesterol side-chain cleavage cytochrome P450 messenger ribonucleic acid levels in primary cultures of mouse Leydig cells. Endocrinology 129 1429–1435.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Philips A, Lesage S, Gingras R, Maira MH, Gauthier Y, Hugo P & Drouin J 1997a Novel dimeric Nur77 signaling mechanism in endocrine and lymphoid cells. Molecular and Cellular Biology 17 5946–5951.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Philips A, Maira M, Mullick A, Chamberland M, Lesage S, Hugo P & Drouin J 1997b Antagonism between Nur77 and glucocorticoid receptor for control of transcription. Molecular and Cellular Biology 17 5952–5959.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rabin D, Gold PW, Margioris AN & Chrousos GP 1988 Stress and reproduction: physiologic and pathophysiologic interactions between the stress and reproductive axes. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 245 377–387.[Medline]

Robert NM, Martin LJ & Tremblay JJ 2006 The orphan nuclear receptor NR4A1 regulates insulin-like 3 gene transcription in Leydig cells. Biology of Reproduction 74 322–330.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schoneveld OJ, Gaemers IC & Lamers WH 2004 Mechanisms of glucocorticoid signalling. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1680 114–128.[Medline]

Schreiber E, Matthias P, Muller MM & Schaffner W 1989 Rapid detection of octamer binding proteins with ‘mini-extracts’, prepared from a small number of cells. Nucleic Acids Research 17 6419[Free Full Text]

Schwarzenbach H, Manna PR, Stocco DM, Chakrabarti G & Mukhopadhyay AK 2003 Stimulatory effect of progesterone on the expression of steroidogenic acute regulatory protein in MA-10 Leydig cells. Biology of Reproduction 68 1054–1063.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Smals AG, Kloppenborg PW & Benraad TJ 1977 Plasma testosterone profiles in Cushing's syndrome. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 45 240–245.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Song KH, Park JI, Lee MO, Soh J, Lee K & Choi HS 2001 LH induces orphan nuclear receptor Nur77 gene expression in testicular Leydig cells. Endocrinology 142 5116–5123.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Song KH, Park YY, Park KC, Hong CY, Park JH, Shong M, Lee K & Choi HS 2004 The atypical orphan nuclear receptor DAX-1 interacts with orphan nuclear receptor Nur77 and represses its transactivation. Molecular Endocrinology 18 1929–1940.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Song KH, Park YY, Kee HJ, Hong CY, Lee YS, Ahn SW, Kim HJ, Lee K, Kook H, Lee IK et al. 2006 Orphan nuclear receptor Nur77 induces zinc finger protein GIOT-1 gene expression, and GIOT-1 acts as a novel corepressor of orphan nuclear receptor SF-1 via recruitment of HDAC2. Journal of Biological Chemistry 281 15605–15614.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Stalker A, Hermo L & Antakly T 1989 Covalent affinity labeling, radioautography, and immunocytochemistry localize the glucocorticoid receptor in rat testicular Leydig cells. American Journal of Anatomy 186 369–377.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Stalker A, Hermo L & Antakly T 1991 Subcellular distribution of [3H]-dexamethasone mesylate binding sites in Leydig cells using electron microscope radioautography. American Journal of Anatomy 190 19–30.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Stikkelbroeck NM, Otten BJ, Pasic A, Jager GJ, Sweep CG, Noordam K & Hermus AR 2001 High prevalence of testicular adrenal rest tumors, impaired spermatogenesis, and Leydig cell failure in adolescent and adult males with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 86 5721–5728.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Stocco DM 2002 Clinical disorders associated with abnormal cholesterol transport: mutations in the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 191 19–25.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Stocco DM, Clark BJ, Reinhart AJ, Williams SC, Dyson M, Dassi B, Walsh LP, Manna PR, Wang X, Zeleznik AJ et al. 2001 Elements involved in the regulation of the StAR gene. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 177 55–59.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Tremblay JJ & Viger RS 2001 GATA factors differentially activate multiple gonadal promoters through conserved GATA regulatory elements. Endocrinology 142 977–986.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Val P, Lefrancois-Martinez AM, Veyssiere G & Martinez A 2003 SF-1 a key player in the development and differentiation of steroidogenic tissues. Nuclear Receptor 1 8[CrossRef][Medline]

Vierhapper H, Nowotny P & Waldhäusl W 2000 Production rates of testosterone in patients with Cushing's syndrome. Metabolism 49 229–231.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Wang Q & Gao HB 2006 Involvement of nuclear factor-{kappa} B on corticosterone-induced rat Leydig cell apoptosis. Asian Journal of Andrology 8 693–702.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Wang X, Walsh LP, Reinhart AJ & Stocco DM 2000 The role of arachidonic acid in steroidogenesis and steroidogenic acute regulatory (StAR) gene and protein expression. Journal of Biological Chemistry 275 20204–20209.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wilson TE, Fahrner TJ & Milbrandt J 1993 The orphan receptors NGFI-B and steroidogenic factor 1 establish monomer binding as a third paradigm of nuclear receptor–DNA interaction. Molecular and Cellular Biology 13 5794–5804.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wingate AD & Arthur JS 2006 Post-translational control of Nur77. Biochemical Society Transactions 34 1107–1109.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Wooton-Kee CR & Clark BJ 2000 Steroidogenic factor-1 influences protein-deoxyribonucleic acid interactions within the cyclic adenosine 3,5-monophosphate-responsive regions of the murine steroidogenic acute regulatory protein gene. Endocrinology 141 1345–1355.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yu CC & Li PH 2006 In vivo inhibition of steroidogenic acute regulatory protein expression by dexamethasone parallels induction of the negative transcription factor DAX-1. Endocrine 30 313–323.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Zhang P & Mellon SH 1997 Multiple orphan nuclear receptors converge to regulate rat P450c17 gene transcription: novel mechanisms for orphan nuclear receptor action. Molecular Endocrinology 11 891–904.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Received in final form 25 June 2008
Accepted 1 July 2008
Made available online as an Accepted Preprint 1 July 2008




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
H. M. Scott, J. I. Mason, and R. M. Sharpe
Steroidogenesis in the Fetal Testis and Its Susceptibility to Disruption by Exogenous Compounds
Endocr. Rev., December 1, 2009; 30(7): 883 - 925.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp Biol MedHome page
H. A. LaVoie and S. R. King
Transcriptional Regulation of Steroidogenic Genes: STARD1, CYP11A1 and HSD3B
Exp Biol Med, August 1, 2009; 234(8): 880 - 907.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
L. J. Martin, N. Boucher, B. El-Asmar, and J. J. Tremblay
cAMP-Induced Expression of the Orphan Nuclear Receptor Nur77 in MA-10 Leydig Cells Involves a CaMKI Pathway
J Androl, March 1, 2009; 30(2): 134 - 145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Mol EndocrinolHome page
L. J Martin and J. J Tremblay
The nuclear receptors NUR77 and SF1 play additive roles with c-JUN through distinct elements on the mouse Star promoter
J. Mol. Endocrinol., February 1, 2009; 42(2): 119 - 129.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
JME-07-0145v1
41/3/165    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martin, L. J
Right arrow Articles by Tremblay, J. J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Martin, L. J
Right arrow Articles by Tremblay, J. J


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS