| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
activates the Runx2-mediated transcription of mouse osteocalcin II promoter
Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 28 Yungun-Dong, Chongno-Gu, Seoul 110-744, Republic of Korea
(Requests for offprints should be addressed to C S Shin; Email: csshin{at}snu.ac.kr)
(D H Kim is now at Department of Internal Medicine, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan 330-714, Korea)
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMaterials and methodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
have been shown to enhance rat osteocalcin promoter activity through the synergistic activation of Runx2 at the C/EBP element. Here we show that in the mouse, C/EBP increases the expression of osteocalcin whereas C/EBPß does not. This increased expression was found to occur at the transcriptional level, as demonstrated by the increased transcriptional activity from mouse osteocalcin II (OG2) promoter by C/EBP. Although we found three putative C/EBP sites in the –637/±34 region of the OG2 promoter, none of these sites showed binding activity with in vitro translated C/EBP proteins. Notably, we show that C/EBP physically interacts with Runx2 and that C/EBP overexpression increases binding between the Runx2–C/EBP complex and the OSE2 element, a critical osteoblast-specific cis-acting element in the OG2 promoter. Consistent with these DNA binding data, a mutation in OSE2 abrogated the stimulatory effect of C/EBP on this promoter activity. Finally, chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis in MC3T3-E1 cells showed in vivo occupancy of the OG2 promoter by Runx2 and C/EBP. In conclusion, C/EBP was found to regulate mouse osteocalcin OG2 promoter activity indirectly by interacting with Runx2 in the context of the OSE2 element and this subsequently resulted in the cooperative activation of the OG2 promoter.
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and methodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
and C/EBPß function as transcriptional activators and play major roles in adipocyte differentiation and in the regulation of gene expression in liver and other tissues (Wedel & Ziegler-Heitbrock 1995, Mandrup & Lane 1997, Tanaka et al. 1997). C/EBP has been demonstrated to regulate the differentiation of preadiopocytes to adipocytes (Samuelsson et al. 1991, Umek et al. 1991, Lin & Lane 1994) and convert fibroblasts into adipocytes (Freytag et al. 1994). Moreover, determined myoblasts with no inherent adipogenic potential can be induced to transdifferentiate into mature adipocytes by the ectopic expression of C/EBP and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor 
, the latter being another key adipogenic transcription factor (Hu et al. 1995). C/EBP has also been identified to control adipogenesis and to mediate acute phase response to inflammatory stimuli (Wedel & Ziegler-Heitbrock 1995, Mandrup & Lane 1997, Tanaka et al. 1997).
Little is known of the roles of C/EBPs in osteoblasts. In the basal state, osteoblasts constitutively express C/EBPß and - (Thomas et al. 1996, Gutierrez et al. 2002), whereas C/EBP has not been detected in bone tissue (Gutierrez et al. 2002). C/EBP has been identified as a principal cAMP-activated regulator of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I gene transcription in osteoblasts via its binding to the HS3D site (Umayahara et al. 1997). In addition, the enhanced expression of both C/EBPß and - potentiated IGF-I promoter activity in response to prostaglandin E2 (McCarthy et al. 2000a). Expression of interleukin-6 is also regulated by C/EBPß by cross-coupling with estrogen receptor and nuclear factor-kappaB (Stein & Yang 1995). Although the targeted deletions of C/EBPß or - did not result in skeletal abnormalities (Tanaka et al. 1995, 1997, Sterneck et al. 1997), these results suggest that C/EBP factors regulate expression of genes involved in bone formation or resorption.
Osteocalcin is a -carboxylated protein, which composes up to 15% of the noncollagenous protein in mature bone (Price et al. 1976). Moreover, osteocalcin expression is largely restricted to the osteoblasts of bone and the odontoblasts and cementoblasts of teeth (McKee et al. 1992). The tissue-specific expression of osteocalcin and its transcriptional control are mainly regulated by Runx2 (Cbfa1/AML3/Pebp2A), a runt related transcription factor (Ducy & Karsenty 1995, Ducy et al. 1997). Runx2 has been shown to activate osteocalcin gene expression by binding to the osteoblast-specific cis-acting element (OSE2), located in the osteocalcin promoter (Ducy et al. 1997) and its transcriptional activity can be modified by growth factors or other transcription factors (Javed et al. 2000, Alliston et al. 2001, Jeon et al. 2003). Recently, the C/EBP-responsive element was identified in the rat osteocalcin promoter, which resides in close proximity to the Runx2 element (Gutierrez et al. 2002), and C/EBPß and - were found synergistically to activate osteocalcin promoter. Although rat and mouse osteocalcin promoters have much in common regarding the regulatory element, they exhibit differences in some aspects of gene regulation. For example, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 inhibits mouse osteocalcin I and II promoters (OG1, OG2) (Zhang et al. 1997), whereas it activates transcription from rat osteocalcin promoter by interacting with a vitamin D responsive element (Price & Baukol 1980, Demay et al. 1989, Lian et al. 1989).
In this study, we addressed the roles of C/EBPs in the regulation of mouse osteocalcin gene expression. We found that mouse osteoblastic cells constitutively express C/EBPß and -. C/EBP enhances mouse osteocalcin gene expression through synergistic cooperation with Runx2, whereas C/EBPß did not affect its activity. Interestingly, this functional synergism between C/EBP and Runx2 was found to be mediated through the OSE2 element of OG2 promoter. We also present evidence that direct interaction between C/EBP and Runx2 is crucial in the cooperative activation of the OG2 promoter.
|
Materials and methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and methodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Monoclonal anti-C/EBP, -ß, and - and anti-Runx2 antibodies were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (San Diego, CA, USA), TRI reagent was from Molecular Research Center (Cincinnati, OH, USA), and western blotting detection reagents and [-32P]dCTP were from Amersham Biosciences (Piscataway, NJ, USA). Random priming kits and reagents for the luciferase assay were purchased from Promega Corp. (Madison, WI, USA) and nitrocellulose membranes were from Schleicher & Schuell (Dassel, Germany). Lipofectamine Plus was obtained from Invitrogen Corp. (Carlsbad, CA, USA). Oligonucleotides were synthesized by Bioneer Corp. (Chungwon, Korea), and all other chemicals, including tissue culture media, were from Sigma Chemical (St Louis, MO, USA), unless otherwise indicated.
Expression vectors and reporter plasmids
An expression vector for C/EBP (pSV-SPORT1-C/EBP) was constructed by isolating full-length C/EBP cDNA from MSV-C/EBP by digestion with EcoRI-BssHII, and insertion into the EcoRI/MluI sites of pSV-SPORT vector (Invitrogen). Expression vectors for C/EBPß and - were constructed by ligating EcoRI/BamHI restriction fragments of C/EBPß or - from MSV-C/EBPß or - into pSV-SPORT, giving pSV-SPORT C/EBPß and - respectively. Retroviral vectors for C/EBPß and - were constructed by ligating the EcoRI/BamHI restriction fragment of C/EBPß or - from MSV-C/EBPß or - into pLXSN, giving pLXSN-C/EBPß and - respectively. The expression vector for Runx2 (MASNSL isoform), pcDNA3-til, was provided by Dr Je-Yong Choi (Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea). pGST-C/EBP containing the whole open reading frame (ORF) of C/EBP cloned into pGEX-4T vector (Amersham Biosciences) was obtained from Dr Minho Shong (Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Korea) and has been described (Jung et al. 2000). Mouse osteocalcin II (OG2) promoter-luciferase reporter constructs (–1.3 OG2-Luc) containing 1.3 kb (positions –1316 to +13) have been described previously (Zhang et al. 1997). A series of deletion mutants of the –1.3 OG2-Luc, namely p657OG2-Luc, p343OG2-Luc, p147OG2-Luc, and p34OG2-Luc, have also been described previously (Ducy & Karsenty 1995). Rat osteocalcin promoter-luciferase reporter constructs (–647 OC-Luc) containing 680 base pairs (position –647 to ±32) in pGL2 Basic (Promega) have been described in detail (Boudreaux & Towler 1996). Deletion constructs lacking each of the putative C/EBP sites were generated using the ‘Quick Change’ PCR-based mutagenesis procedure (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA) with the p657OG2-Luc plasmid as a template. The p657
C1OG2-Luc mutant construct was generated with the primers 5'-GAAGAGCCTAGCCC ATTGTG-3' and 5'-GGAGGCATTTTCTCAATTGAGG-3', the p657C2 OG2-Luc construct with primers 5'-TCCATAAGATCCGGTTGTAGGG-3' and 5'-AG GGTTCTTGTCTCTAGGGC-3', the p657C3 OG2-Luc construct with primers 5'-GCCCTAGAGACAAGAACCCT-3' and 5'-ACCAACCACAGCATCCTTTG-3', and the p657OSE2 OG2-Luc construct with primers 5'-GGTGATTGCAGCTGCCT-3' and 5'-GAGAGCACAGAGTAGCCGAT-3'. The appropriate absence of unwanted mutations was confirmed by sequencing the plasmid. The p6OSE2-Luc and p6OSE2 m-Luc plasmids contain six copies of the wild-type or of the mutant OSE2 sequence of the OG2 promoter respectively, followed by a minimal promoter, which directs luciferase expression (Ducy & Karsenty 1995).
Cell culture
Normal mouse osteoblasts were isolated from 21-day-old fetal mouse calvariae using a well-characterized technique essentially as described previously (Furlan et al. 2001). The rat osteogenic sarcoma cell line, ROS 17/2.8 cells, expresses several osteoblastic features, including the production of osteocalcin and other matrix proteins (Majeska et al. 1985). ROS 17/2.8 cells were cultured in DMEM/F12 containing 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS, BioWhittaker Inc., Walkersville, MD, USA). Mouse MC3T3-E1 osteoblastic cells, derived from spontaneously immortalized calvarial cells (Sudo et al. 1983) were maintained in DMEM/F12 medium containing 10% FBS. During osteoblastic differentiation studies, MC3T3-E1 cells were cultured in DMEM/F12 medium containing 10% FBS supplemented with 50 µg/ml ascorbic acid and 10 mM ß-glycerophosphate. Another mouse osteoblastic cell line, ST2 cells, was maintained in MEM medium containing 10% FBS. Mouse embryonic mesenchymal cells, C3H10T1/2 (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA), are pluripotent cells that retain an immature, fibroblast-like appearance under standard tissue culture conditions. C3H10T1/2 cells were grown in basal medium of Eagle (BME) containing 10% FBS. The 3T3-L1 preadipocytic cell line was a kind gift from Dr Jae Bum Kim (Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea). 3T3-L1 cells were maintained in an immature state by culturing in DMEM supplemented with 20% FBS and 2.0 mM glutamine.
Retrovirus production and transduction of cell lines
For transient generation of VSV-G pseudo-typed retrovirus, 293T cells were plated in 60-mm diameter dishes (1.8 x 106 cells in 3 ml DMEM containing 10% FBS) and allowed to attach overnight. The plasmids pMD-gag-pol and pMD-VSVG (both kindly provided by Dr Richard C Mulligan at Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA) and the retroviral vectors pLXSN, pLXSN-C/EBPß, or pLXSN-C/EBP were introduced into 293T cells (a packaging cell line) using Lipo-fectamine Plus reagents according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Viral supernatant was collected at 48 h after DNA addition, filtered through a 0.45 µm syringe filter (Nalgene, Rochester, NY, USA), and stored at –80 °C. Logarithmically growing MC3T3-E1 or ROS 17/2.8 cells were transduced with pLXSN, pLXSN-C/EBPß, or pLXSN-C/EBP retrovirus by centrifugation at 1200 g for 90 min at 32 °C. Cells expressing exogenous DNA were selected by G418 (1000 mg/ml for MC3T3-E1 and 400 mg/ml for ROS17/2.8 cells) for 2 to 3 weeks. Drug-resistant colonies were selected and expanded, and the expression of the exogenous genes was confirmed by Western blotting analysis, as described below.
Northern blotting
Total cellular RNA was isolated from cell monolayers using TRI reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Samples (20 µg/lane) were separated on 1% formaldehyde agarose gels by electrophoresis, blotted onto nylon membranes, and UV crosslinked. The membranes were then hybridized using 32P-labeled probes prepared using the random primed oligo-nucleotide method in ULTRAhyb solution (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) at 42 °C overnight and washed twice in 2 x SSC, 0.1% SDS at 42 °C, followed by one high stringency wash in 0.2 x SSC, 0.1% SDS at 42 °C for 15 min. The following cDNA probes were used: 1.0 kb NcoI fragment of C/EBP, 1.5 kb EcoRI-XhoI fragment of C/EBPß, 1.0 kb EcoRI–BamHI fragment of C/EBP, 470 bp EcoRI–PstI fragment of osteocalcin, 1.1 kb KpnI fragment of collagen type 1, 1.5 kb full length cDNA of Runx2, 1.3 kb full length cDNA of osteopontin, and 1.9 kb BamHI fragment of rat ß-actin.
Western blotting
Cell lysates were prepared by treating cells with lysis buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.4), 20 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS and protease inhibitors). Lysates were sonicated for 20 min on ice and centrifuged at 10 000 g for 10 min to sediment particulate material. Protein concentrations of the supernatants were determined as described by Lowry et al.(1951). SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was performed on 10% polyacrylamide gels and the resolved proteins were transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes were blocked with 0.1% Tween-20 TBS containing 2% BSA and 3% dry milk, at pH 7.4, for one hour. Polycloncal antibodies against C/EBP, -ß, or - were added and incubation was continued for another hour. After washing in 0.1% Tween-20 TBS, the membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse antibodies for one hour. After extensive washing, bands were visualized by chemiluminescence using an ECL kit (Amersham Biosciences), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Immunoprecipitations
MC3T3-E1 cells were lysed in 50 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, and 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, containing a cocktail of protease inhibitors (Sigma). Lysates were then precleared for 3 h at 4 °C with protein G-Sepharose (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). For immunoprecipitation of endogenous Runx2 or C/EBP from MC3T3-E1 cells, we used goat anti-Runx2 or anti-C/EBP. An isotype-matched antibody (anti-thyroglobulin) was used as a control. The lysates were incubated for 3 h at 4 °C prior to being incubated with protein G-Sepharose. After extensive washing, the immunoprecipitates were electrophoresed in SDS–polyacrylamide gel and the expression levels of the proteins of interest were verified by western analyses using specific antibodies.
Transfections and reporter assays
Transient transfections were performed in triplicate, and transfection efficiencies were monitored using cytomegalovirus-ß-galactosidase (pCMV-ß-gal, Promega Corp.) vectors in parallel cultures. For these experiments, osteoblastic cells were plated at high density (3 x 105 cells/well) onto 12-well plates. Appropriate plasmids were transfected into each well using Lipofectamine Plus reagent (Invitrogen Corp.) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cell lysates (0.25 ml/well) were prepared using the Promega Luciferase assay system and reporter activity was measured using a luminometer (Lumat LB 9507, Berthold, Bad Wildbad, Germany). All luciferase values were normalized against the ß-galactosidase activity from the cotransfected pCMV-ß-gal plasmid. All values, means, and standard deviations were expressed relative to basal promoter activity as fold inductions.
Glutathione S-transferase (GST) pull-down analyses
GST fusion proteins were induced in Eschericia coli BL21 for 3 h at 25 °C by adding isopropyl-1-thio-ß-D-galactopyranoside (100 µM final concentration) to a 100-ml bacterial culture (A600 
0.5). After induction, bacteria were pelleted for 20 min at 3000 x g and resuspended in 20 ml ice-cold binding buffer (20 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, 0.1 mM PMSF, 1 mM EDTA). The bacteria were then lysed using three freeze-thaw cycles (5 min in liquid nitrogen followed by thawing for 10 min at 37 °C). The lysed bacteria were then subjected to three 10-s rounds of sonication (7 µ amplitude) at 4 °C, and bacterial debris was pelleted by centrifugation at 15 000 x g for 30 min at 4 °C. Supernatants were stored frozen at –20 °C in 100-µl aliquots until needed. Free GST lysates were prepared in a similar manner from E. coli BL21 transformed with pGEX-3 vector. Free GST and GST fusion proteins were purified on a glutathione–Sepharose 4B column (Amersham Biosciences) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations, and then dialyzed against binding buffer.
For the GST pull-down assays, equal amounts of purified recombinant GST or the GST fusion proteins were immobilized on glutathione–Sepharose beads and washed four times with 1 ml wash buffer (20 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1% NP-40, 1 mM NaF, 2 µg/ml aprotinin, 0.1 mM PMSF) at 4 °C. 35S-Labeled Runx2 was synthesized in rabbit reticulocyte lysate by coupled in vitro transcription and translation (TNT T7-coupled reticulocyte lysate system; Promega Corp.), and then added to immobilized GST or GST fusion proteins and incubated for 2 h. After binding, proteins bound to the beads were eluted with elution buffer (10 mM reduced glutathione, 20 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5), 0.1 mM PMSF, 0.1% NP-40, 2 µg/ml aprotinin). Samples were then separated in SDS-polyacrylamide gel and analyzed by autoradiography.
Electrophoretic mobility shift assay
Nuclear extracts were prepared as described by Dignam et al.(1983). Briefly, cells were washed with ice-cold PBS, and then resuspended in hypotonic lysis buffer containing 20 mM HEPES (pH 8.0), 25% glycerol, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.3% Triton X-100, 0.6% ammonium sulfate, 1 mM dithiothreitol and the protease inhibitors. The protein concentrations of the nuclear extracts were determined by the Bradford assay (BioRad) using bovine serum albumin as a standard. In vitro translated C/EBP, -ß, or - was obtained by transcribing and translating pSV-SPORT-C/EBP, -ß, or - expression plasmids respectively, using the TNT SP6/T7-coupled reticulocyte lysate system. Protein concentration was measured using parallel [35S]methionine-labeled reactions. Oligonucleotide probes corresponding to the OSE2 site in the mouse osteocalcin promoter (5'-GATCCGCTGCAATCACC AACCACAGCA-3') (Ducy & Karsenty 1995) and the optimal consensus C/EBP element (5'-ATTTTTGCGCAATTTTATTGCGCAATCAATATTGAATAA-3'; two adjacent C/EBP binding sites are underlined) (Elberg et al. 2000), and the putative C/EBP binding site in OG2 promoter (C1, 5'-TCCCCACCAACCACAAG AAATGCCCTACAACCGG-3'; C2, 5'- AGCTGCCC TGAACTGGGCAAATGAGGACATTACTG-3'; C3, 5'-CCTTGCCCAGGCAGCTGCAATCACCAACCACA-3'; the bases corresponding to consensus binding site are underlined) were generated using an oligonucleotide synthesizer (Bioneer Corp.). Complementary oligonucleotides were annealed and labeled with [-32P]dCTP. The binding reaction was performed by incubating 10 µg nuclear protein from cultured cells or in vitro translated proteins in 20 mM HEPES (pH 8.0), 25% glycerol, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 300 mg bovine serum albumin, and 1 mg poly(dI-dC) in a final volume of 10 µl for 10 min at 25 °C. Labeled oligonucleotides were added to the reaction mixture and incubated for an additional 20 min on ice. To prove the involvement of C/EBP or Runx2 in the formation of a ternary complex, nuclear lysates were preincubated at 4 °C for 1 h with anti-C/EBP or anti-Runx2 antibody prior to the addition of poly(dI-dC) and radiolabeled probe DNA. Samples were electrophoresed in 4% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gels, which were then dried and autoradiographed.
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays
MC3T3-E1 cells were treated with 50 µg/ml ascorbic acid and 10 mM ß-glycerophosphate for 12 days to induce osteogenic differentiation. Chromatin-binding proteins were cross-linked by treating the cells with 1% formaldehyde in PBS for 15 min at room temperature. Cells were washed with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline, scraped, and swollen on ice for 10 min in phosphate-buffered saline containing protease inhibitors (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, USA). Cell extracts were prepared in SDS lysis buffer (1% SDS, 10 mM EDTA, 50 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.1) and protease inhibitors). Extracts were sonicated with a microtip on ice to obtain DNA fragments ranging from 200 to 1000 bp. Five microliters of supernatant were saved as input DNA, and the remaining soluble chromatin fragments were diluted 1:10 in ChIP dilution buffer (0.01% SDS, 1.1% Triton X-100, 1.2 mM EDTA, and 16.7 mM Tris–HCl) containing protease inhibitors.
The chromatin suspension was precleared using Protein-A beads (Amersham Biosciences), and then incubated with 1 µg of an antibody specific to Runx2 or C/EBP at 4 °C overnight. Normal rabbit IgG and irrelevant anti-thyrotropin (TSH) receptor antibody was used as a negative control. Protein-A beads were added to the samples and incubated for 15 min at 4 °C. The beads were collected by centrifugation at 10 000 x g for 3 min and washed once in low salt buffer (0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, 2 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0), four times in high salt buffer (0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, 2 mM EDTA, 500 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0), once in lithium chloride buffer (250 mM LiCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 1% deoxycholate, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0), and once in 1 x TE (10 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0, 10 mM EDTA) at room temperature for 10 min each. The protein–DNA complexes were then eluted from the beads using elution buffer (50 mM NaHCO3, 1% SDS), and the cross-links were removed by heating at 67 °C for 4–5 h. DNA was purified from the complexes by phenol/chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation, and analyzed by PCR using the following primer pairs encompassing the – 285/– 84 region of the OG2 promoter: P1, 5'-CCAGCTGAGGCTGAGAGAGA-3' and P2, 5'-CTAATTGGGGGTCATGTGCT-3' (see Fig. 7A
). As a control, PCR using primer pairs encompassing the –1247/–1145 region, which does not contain either the C/EBP or the OSE2 site (P3, 5'-GCAGTTAAGAGCCACTGACT-3' and P4, 5'-AAGAGGGCATCAGATTCCAC-3'), was performed in parallel.
|
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and methodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
are expressed in murine osteoblastic cell lines
We examined the expression of C/EBP factors in mouse calvarial cells and in a series of osteoblastic and non-osteoblastic cell lines. Western blotting analysis revealed that both C/EBPß and - were expressed in murine calvarial cells, MC3T3-E1, ST2, C3H10T1/2, rat osteogenic sarcoma ROS 17/2.8 cells, and 3T3-L1 adipocytes (Fig. 1A). However, C/EBP was not detected in calvarial cells and three osteoblastic cell lines, MC3T3-E1, ST2 and ROS 17/2.8. C3H10T1/2 cells, a mesenchymal cell line, expressed little C/EBP compared with 3T3-L1 adipocytes, which were used as a positive control.
|
). However, the mRNA expression of C/EBP showed a biphasic pattern, decreasing during the early phase of matrix maturation (days 0–7), followed by an increase with mineral deposition (days 12–19). Moreover, the later increase in C/EBP expression coincided with peak expression of osteocalcin, suggesting that C/EBP may participate in the regulation of osteocalcin expression. The peak expression of Runx2, the essential element for osteocalcin expression, seems to precede the expression of osteocalcin.
C/EBP activates osteocalcin gene expression in osteoblasts
The possibility that C/EBPs activates osteocalcin expression was investigated. ROS 17/2.8 and MC3T3-E1 cells were stably transduced with C/EBPß or - retrovirus and the expression of transduced genes was verified by Western blot analysis (Fig. 2A,B). ROS 17/2.8 cells were found to constitutively express osteocalcin and the level of its expression was robustly increased by stable transduction of C/EBP (Fig. 2C). Overexpression of C/EBPß also increased osteocalcin mRNA levels, albeit less strongly than C/EBP (Fig. 2C). Expression of osteopontin and collagen type 1 exhibited a similar response. MC3T3-E1 cells expressed only low levels of osteocalcin in the basal condition, but stable transduction with C/EBP greatly enhanced its expression (Fig. 2D). In contrast, the expression level of osteocalcin was unaffected by the overexpression of C/EBPß (Fig. 2D). The expression of other osteoblast-specific genes, including osteopontin and collagen type 1, showed a similar pattern. These results suggest that C/EBP increased the expression of osteocalcin and of other osteoblast-specific genes in both mouse and rat osteoblastic cell lines, whereas C/EBPß has species-dependent effects on osteoblasts.
|
activates osteocalcin gene transcription from mouse osteocalcin OG2 promoter
To further confirm the role of C/EBPs on osteocalcin expression, we analyzed luciferase activity in cells transfected with the mouse osteocalcin OG2 promoter–luciferase construct, –1.3 OG2-Luc. The transient transfection of –1.3 OG2-Luc into ROS 17/2.8 cells resulted in constitutive reporter activity, and this activity increased four-fold in cells cotransfected with the C/EBP construct, whereas the reporter activity was unchanged by cotransfection with C/EBPß (Fig. 3A). The same pattern of C/EBP-mediated induction of reporter activity was noted in MC3T3-E1 cells. Again, transient transfection of C/EBPß had no effect on OG2 promoter activity. These results are consistent with the findings of northern blotting and suggest that mouse osteocalcin OG2 promoter responds to C/EBP but not to C/EBPß. In contrast, transient transfection of C/EBPß or - into ROS 17/2.8 cells enhanced the rat osteocalcin promoter activity by 7.5- and 7-fold respectively (Fig. 3B), which is consistent with a previous study by Gutierrez et al.(2002). In MC3T3-E1 cells, overexpression of C/EBPß or - stimulated the reporter activity by 4- and 5.5-fold respectively (Fig. 3B).
|
, we studied a series of luciferase reporter constructs with serial deletions of the OG2 promoter. In DNA transfection experiments, the basal promoter activity in ROS 17/2.8 cells was not significantly altered until the region –147 to –34 was deleted. Cotransfection of C/EBP in this setting consistently increased promoter activity by 2- to 4.5-fold. However, the removal of the sequence between –657 to –343 and –343 to –147 resulted in a decreased C/EBP-mediated stimulation. Furthermore, the deletion of the sequence between –147 and –34 completely abolished both the basal promoter activity and the C/EBP-mediated activation (Fig. 3C). These results suggest that there may be more than one C/EBP site in this OG2 promoter segment that could mediate the C/EBP-mediated transactivation.
C/EBP does not directly bind to the OG2 promoter
Given the results of the deletion mutant analysis, we next systemically analyzed the –657 to +13 region of the OG2 promoter for its contribution to the C/EBP-mediated activation. Sequence analysis of this region using a computer program (Alibaba 2.1; http://www.gene-regulation.com/pub/programs/alibaba2) reveals the presence of three putative C/EBP motifs (C1, –607 to –598; C2, –466 to –456; and C3, –141 to –150, Fig. 4A).
|
, the reporter activity from the wild-type p657OG2-Luc, which contains Runx2 and three putative C/EBP binding sites, was increased by 1.8- or 2.4-fold by the transient transfection of C/EBP or Runx2 expression vector respectively into C3H10T1/2 cells. Notably, cotransfection of Runx2 and C/EBP results in a robust activation of the p657 OG2-Luc reporter activity, demonstrating a functional synergism between these two factors. However, deletion of each of three putative C/EBP sites (p657C1OG2-Luc, p657C2OG2-Luc, and p657C3OG2-Luc) did not result in a significant change in the slightly increased promoter activity by C/EBP. In contrast, deletion of the Runx2 site (p657OSE2OG2-Luc) completely abolished both the Runx2-mediated activation and synergism between C/EBP and Runx2. To further confirm the role of putative C/EBP sites, gel mobility shift analysis was performed using oligonucleotides containing three putative elements (Fig. 4C). However, none of these sites were able to bind to in vitro translated C/EBPs (Fig. 4D, data not shown for C1- and C2-C/EBP). As a control, we observed binding activity between the C/EBP consensus element and in vitro translated C/EBPs (Fig. 4D, right panel). Although we cannot exclude the possibility that C/EBP proteins may bind to the noncanonical C/EBP site, these results suggest that three putative C/EBP sites do not have binding activity to the C/EBP proteins nor do they contribute to the activation of the OG2 promoter. Based on the results in Fig. 4B, it may be deduced that the synergistic activation of OG2 promoter by Runx2 and C/EBP may be mediated by the Runx2-binding element, OSE2 of the OG2 promoter.
C/EBP enhances the transcriptional activity of Runx2 through physical interaction
We next investigated the possibility that C/EBP interacts with Runx2 thereby enhancing the transcription activity of Runx2 at the OSE2 element. Towards this end, transient transfection was performed on C3H10T1/2 cells. As shown in Fig. 5A, transfection of p6OSE2-Luc, in which luciferase expression is controlled by six tandem copies of the OSE2 element (Ducy & Karsenty 1995), resulted in only a low level of luciferase activity in the absence of Runx2. However, cotransfection of the Runx2 expression vector (pcDNA3-til) enhanced transcription in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 5A). The transfection of these cells with C/EBP in this setting enhanced Runx2-dependent transcription threefold (Fig. 5B). Mutation of the OSE2 sites in the p6 OSE2 m-Luc plasmid abolished the induction of transcription by Runx2 as well as C/EBP-mediated activation (Fig. 5B). These results suggest that C/EBP-mediated enhancement of osteocalcin promoter activity depends on Runx2 expression as well as on the presence of an intact OSE2 site, the Runx2-binding sequence in osteocalcin promoter.
|
to synergistically activate osteocalcin promoter. First, we directly assayed protein interactions in vitro, using GST-C/EBP and in vitro translated Runx2 labeled with [35S]methionine. As shown in Fig. 5C, 35S-labeled Runx2 associated with GST-C/EBP but not with GST alone. To further evaluate the ability of endogenous C/EBP to interact with endogenous Runx2 in vivo, we performed a coimmunoprecipitation experiment followed by Western blot analyses. As shown in Fig 5D, immunoprecipitation of MC3T3-E1 lysates either with anti-Runx2 or anti-C/EBP antibody could pull down Runx2 (Fig. 5D, left panel). We also found that immunoprecipitation of Runx2 or C/EBP coprecipitated C/EBP (Fig 5D, right panel). Collectively, these findings indicate that C/EBP physically interacts with Runx2 and enhances its transcriptional activity at the OSE2 element, the Runx2-binding sequence in the osteocalcin promoter.
C/EBP forms a ternary complex with Runx2 in the context of OSE2
To further clarify the role of the cooperative protein interactions in the context of the OSE2 site, we performed a gel mobility shift assay using an oligonucleotide probe representing the OSE2 motif of mouse OG2 promoter. As shown in Fig. 6A, incubation of nuclear extracts from MC3T3-E1 cells overexpressing C/EBP with radiolabeled OSE2 probe gave rise to a shifted band (*) that may represent the Runx2–DNA complex. In addition, we observed a slowly migrating complex (**), which increased in intensity in a dose-dependent manner on transfecting increasing amounts of C/EBP expression plasmid (Fig. 6A, lanes 1–4). Furthermore, this higher complex was competed by nonlabeled C/EBP consensus (lanes 6–8) and OSE2 oligonucleotides (lanes 12–14) but not by the mutant C/EBP (lanes 9–11) or mutant OSE2 oligonucleotides (lanes 16–18). The formation of this complex was abolished when an antiserum specific for C/EBP was added to the reaction mixture (compare lanes 19 and 20) and was supershifted by the addition of anti-Runx2 antibody (lane 21), suggesting that C/EBP is implicated in the formation of the ternary complex (**).
|
, we performed ChIP assays. For this experiment, MC3T3-E1 cells were treated with ascorbic acid and ß-glycerophosphate for 3, 12, or 19 days to induce osteoblastic differentiation, and cross-linked with formaldehyde. The primers used in the PCR analysis amplify a 202-bp fragment of the OG2 promoter region encompassing the C3-OSE2 element. Since the C3 and OSE2 elements were too close, the primers (P1 and P2) were designed to encompass both sites together. The position of this fragment relative to OSE2 and the C/EBP site is shown in Fig. 7A. As shown in Fig. 7B, antibodies against C/EBP failed to precipitate the OG2 promoter containing the C3-OSE2 element on day 3 of osteoblastic differentiation (lane 1), whereas Runx2 was weakly but clearly associated with chromatin in this stage of differentiation (lane 2). We were able to demonstrate more robust PCR bands from chromatins immunoprecipitated with both C/EBP and Runx2 antibodies in cells harvested on days 12 (lanes 3, 4) and 19 (lanes 5, 6) of culture. In control experiments, an irrelevant TSH receptor antibody (lane 10) or normal rabbit IgG (lane 11) could not immunoprecipitate this region of the OG2 promoter. In addition, primer pairs that do not contain the OSE2 element (P3-P4) were also used as a negative control (lanes 7, 8). Although these ChIP analysis results per se cannot exclude the possibility that C/EBP may directly bind to the C3 site of the promoter, the lack of positive PCR bands on day 3 with subsequent increases on days 12 and 19 further support the notion that the cooperative interaction between Runx2 and C/EBP at the OSE2 element may contribute to the C/EBP-mediated activation of the mouse osteocalcin OG2 promoter. |
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and methodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
in conjunction with Runx2 cooperatively activate mouse osteocalcin promoter, and suggests that they may play an important regulatory role in the differentiation of osteoblasts. Mouse calvarial cells and the osteoblastic cell line MC3T3-E1 express C/EBPß and - but not C/EBP, and we found that the overexpression of C/EBP in osteoblasts upregulates osteocalcin gene expression. This activation seems to be a consequence of the physical interaction between C/EBP and Runx2 at the OSE2 site, resulting in the synergistic activation of osteocalcin promoter. These results provide a mechanistic basis for the regulation of Runx2 transcriptional activity by C/EBP through functional cooperation between these two factors.
We found that mouse calvarial cells and osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells express C/EBPß and - but not C/EBP, confirming the earlier reports in rat osteoblasts (Gutierrez et al. 2002). In contrast, pluripotent mesenchymal C3H10T1/2 cells express all three repertoires of C/EBPs, including C/EBP. The expression of C/EBP showed a biphasic pattern, i.e. downregulation after reaching confluency with a subsequent increase during the later stage of maturation, when osteocalcin expression is maximal in mouse osteoblastic cell lines. Our data is consistent with findings in primary rat osteoblasts, and suggest that C/EBP is linked to the expression of osteocalcin (Gutierrez et al. 2002). It is worth noting that although Runx2 is an essential transcription factor for osteoblast differentiation and the synthesis of osteoblast-specific proteins, its abundance is downregulated during osteoblast maturation when osteocalcin expression is upregulated. Moreover, it has been shown that C/EBP is positively regulated by Runx2 (McCarthy et al. 2000b). This dynamic pattern of C/EBP and Runx2 expression suggests that cooperative activation of osteocalcin promoter by C/EBP may confer a tissue-specific, temporal form of regulation in amplifying Runx2-mediated transcription and osteoblastic differentiation. Indeed, we found that the retroviral overexpression of C/EBP resulted in the upregulation of the expression of osteocalcin and of other osteoblast-specific genes.
In contrast to C/EBP, the expression of C/EBPß in MC3T3-E1 cells gradually reduced during culture, and the overexpression of C/EBPß did not enhance the expression of osteocalcin or its transcriptional activity. Our findings in this context are analogous to those of Iyer et al.(2004) who reported that the overexpression of C/EBPß in MC3T3-E1 cells suppressed osteogenic differentiation, but promoted proliferation. In contrast, both C/EBPß and - have been shown to enhance osteocalcin transcription from rat osteocalcin promoter (Gutierrez et al. 2002), and C/EBPß was found to promote osteoblastic differentiation of mesenchymal cells (Hata et al. 2002). The reason for this seeming discrepancy concerning the role of C/EBPß on osteoblast phenotype is unclear. The discordant response of the osteocalcin promoter may be attributed to a different set of cis acting elements located in the mouse and rat osteocalcin promoter. More importantly, these results may suggest that species-specific expressions of different isoforms of C/EBP proteins play different roles during osteoblast differentiation, from the stage of lineage commitment from mesenchymal progenitors to the later stage of mineralization, to ensure the fine regulation of osteoblastic differentiation. Further investigations to identify the coactivators or corepressors involved in this process will increase our understanding of the detailed underlying molecular mechanisms.
Although our findings that C/EBP enhances Runx2-mediated osteocalcin promoter activity concurs with rat osteocalcin promoter results, the mechanism whereby they exert cooperative activation is different. In rat osteocalcin promoter, Gutierrez and coworkers have shown that both C/EBPß and - bind to a C/EBP motif located distal to the Runx2 site (Gutierrez et al. 2002). However, the C/EBP site identified in rat osteocalcin promoter is not conserved in mouse or human osteocalcin promoter and we were unable to identify the corresponding C/EBP element in mouse osteocalcin OG2 promoter. Instead, three putative C/EBP sites were identified in the –657/+34 region of the OG2 promoter. However, we found that none of these sites were able to bind to in vitro translated C/EBPs. Indeed, the sequences of all the three putative sites diverge from the consensus C/EBP domain (RTTGCGYAAY), suggesting that these sites are not good candidates for the actual binding for C/EBPs. Although we cannot exclude the possibility that a C/EBP responsive element is located further upstream or downstream in the osteocalcin locus, we provide evidence that C/EBP upregulates osteocalcin expression indirectly by affecting Runx2 function. First, C/EBP was found to activate osteocalcin promoter activity only in cells that express Runx2. Secondly, the presence of both Runx2 and an intact OSE2 site was found to be necessary for the C/EBP-mediated enhancement of osteocalcin promoter. Thirdly, we demonstrated an interaction between C/EBP and Runx2 in MC3T3-E1 cells, in which C/EBP-mediated activation was observed. Finally, gel mobility shift assays and ChIP assays demonstrated that the interaction of C/EBP and Runx2 occurs in the context of OSE2. Therefore, we conclude that the enhancement of Runx2-mediated transcription by C/EBP results from the protein interaction between Runx2 and C/EBP at the OSE2 sequence.
The remaining issue to be answered is the possibility that C/EBPs activate Runx2-mediated osteocalcin promoter activation by indirect mechanisms. A recent study identified C/EBP as a principal cAMP-activated regulator of the IGF-I gene transcription in osteoblasts, and that activated C/EBPß binds specifically to HS3D to activate IGF-I gene transcription through promoter 1 (Umayahara et al. 1997). As IGF-I, an essential growth factor that regulates the growth and remodeling of skeletal tissue, is also involved in the activation of osteocalcin promoter activity through both protein kinase (PK) A and PKC signaling cascades (Boguslawski et al. 2000), C/EBPß or - might indirectly affect osteocalcin promoter activity in this way.
To summarize, we found evidence that C/EBP regulates mouse osteocalcin OG2 promoter via its cooperative interaction with Runx2 transcription factor. Further investigations of the physiologic role of C/EBPs on osteoblast differentiation will contribute to our understanding of bone development and remodeling.
|
Acknowledgements |
|---|
, -ß, and - plasmids, Minho Shong (Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Korea) for the GST-C/EBP plasmid, and Je-Yong Choi (Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea) for the pcDNA3-til plasmid. Dr Richard C Mulligan (Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA) is thanked for pMD-gag-pol and pMD-VSVG, and Patricia Ducy (Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA) for all the reporter plasmids.
|
Funding |
|---|
This work was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Health and Welfare of Korea (01-PJ1-PG1–01CH08–0001).
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that would prejudice its impartiality.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and methodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Boguslawski G, Hale LV, Yu XP, Miles RR, Onyia JE, Santerre RF & Chandrasekhar S 2000 Activation of osteocalcin transcription involves interaction of protein kinase A- and protein kinase C-dependent pathways. Journal of Biological Chemistry 275 999–1006.
Boudreaux JM & Towler DA 1996 Synergistic induction of osteocalcin gene expression: identification of a bipartite element conferring fibroblast growth factor 2 and cyclic AMP responsiveness in the rat osteocalcin promoter. Journal of Biological Chemistry 271 7508–7515.
Cao Z, Umek RM & McKnight SL 1991 Regulated expression of three C/EBP isoforms during adipose conversion of 3T3-L1 cells. Genes and Development 5 1538–1552.
Darlington GJ, Ross SE & MacDougald OA 1998 The role of C/EBP genes in adipocyte differentiation. Journal of Biological Chemistry 273 30057–30060.
Demay MB, Roth DA & Kronenberg HM 1989 Regions of the rat osteocalcin gene which mediate the effect of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 on gene transcription. Journal of Biological Chemistry 264 2279–2282.
Dignam JD, Lebovitz RM & Roeder RG 1983 Accurate transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II in a soluble extract from isolated mammalian nuclei. Nucleic Acids Research 11 1475–1489.
Ducy P & Karsenty G 1995 Two distinct osteoblast-specific cis-acting elements control expression of a mouse osteocalcin gene. Molecular and Cellular Biology 15 1858–1869.[Abstract]
Ducy P, Zhang R, Geoffroy V, Ridall AL & Karsenty G 1997 Osf2/Cbfa1: a transcriptional activator of osteoblast differentiation. Cell 89 747–754.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Elberg G, Gimble JM & Tsai SY 2000 Modulation of the murine peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma 2 promoter activity by CCAAT/enhancer-binding proteins. Journal of Biological Chemistry 275 27815–27822.
Freytag SO, Paielli DL & Gilbert JD 1994 Ectopic expression of the CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha promotes the adipogenic program in a variety of mouse fibroblastic cells. Genes and Development 8 1654–1663.
Furlan F, Lecanda F, Screen J & Civitelli R 2001 Proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis in connexin43-null osteoblasts. Cell Communication and Adhesion 8 367–371.
Gutierrez S, Javed A, Tennant DK, van Rees M, Montecino M, Stein GS, Stein JL & Lian JB 2002 CCAAT/enhancer-binding proteins (C/EBP) beta and delta activate osteocalcin gene transcription and synergize with Runx2 at the C/EBP element to regulate bone-specific expression. Journal of Biological Chemistry 277 1316–1323.
Hata K, Ikeda F, Yamashita K, Ichida F, Matsubara T, Nobuki T, Yamaguchi A, Nishimura R & Yoneda T 2002 LIP, a natural truncated isoform of the transcription factor C/EBPß, promotes osteoblastogenesis and inhibits adipogenesis in the mesenchymal stem cells. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 17 Suppl 1S151.
Hu E, Tontonoz P & Spiegelman BM 1995 Transdifferentiation of myoblasts by the adipogenic transcription factors PPAR gamma and C/EBP alpha. PNAS 92 9856–9860.
Iyer VV, Kadakia TB, McCabe LR & Schwartz RC 2004 CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein-beta has a role in osteoblast proliferation and differentiation. Experimental Cell Research 295 128–137.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Javed A, Guo B, Hiebert S, Choi JY, Green J, Zhao SC, Osborne MA, Stifani S, Stein JL, Lian JB et al. 2000 Groucho/TLE/R-esp proteins associate with the nuclear matrix and repress RUNX (CBF(alpha)/AML/PEBP2(alpha)) dependent activation of tissue-specific gene transcription. Journal of Cell Science 113 2221–2231.[Abstract]
Jeon MJ, Kim JA, Kwon SH, Kim SW, Park KS, Park SW, Kim SY & Shin CS 2003 Activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma inhibits the Runx2-mediated transcription of osteocalcin in osteoblasts. Journal of Biological Chemistry 278 23270–23277.
Jung N, Yi YW, Kim D, Shong M, Hong SS, Lee HS & Bae I 2000 Regulation of Gadd45 gamma expression by C/EBP. European Journal of Biochemistry 267 6180–6187.[Web of Science][Medline]
Landschulz WH, Johnson PF & McKnight SL 1989 The DNA binding domain of the rat liver nuclear protein C/EBP is bipartite. Science 243 1681–1688.
Lekstrom-Himes J & Xanthopoulos KG 1998 Biological role of the CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein family of transcription factors. Journal of Biological Chemistry 273 28545–28548.
Lian J, Stewart C, Puchacz E, Mackowiak S, Shalhoub V, Collart D, Zambetti G & Stein G 1989 Structure of the rat osteocalcin gene and regulation of vitamin D-dependent expression. PNAS 86 1143–1147.
Lin FT & Lane MD 1994 CCAAT/enhancer binding protein alpha is sufficient to initiate the 3T3- L1 adipocyte differentiation program. PNAS 91 8757–8761.
Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL & Randell RJ 1951 Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. Journal of Biological Chemistry 193 265–275.
McCarthy TL, Ji C, Chen Y, Kim K & Centrella M 2000a Time-and dose-related interactions between glucocorticoid and cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate on CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein-dependent insulin-like growth factor I expression by osteoblasts. Endocrinology 141 127–137.
McCarthy TL, Ji C, Chen Y, Kim KK, Imagawa M, Ito Y & Centrella M 2000b Runt domain factor (Runx)-dependent effects on CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein delta expression and activity in osteoblasts. Journal of Biological Chemistry 275 21746–21753.
McKee MD, Glimcher MJ & Nanci A 1992 High-resolution immunolocalization of osteopontin and osteocalcin in bone and cartilage during endochondral ossification in the chicken tibia. Anatomical Record 234 479–492.[CrossRef][Medline]
Majeska RJ, Nair BC & Rodan GA 1985 Glucocorticoid regulation of alkaline phosphatase in the osteoblastic osteosarcoma cell line ROS 17/2.8. Endocrinology 116 170–179.
Mandrup S & Lane MD 1997 Regulating adipogenesis. Journal of Biological Chemistry 272 5367–5370.
Poli V 1998 The role of C/EBP isoforms in the control of inflammatory and native immunity functions. Journal of Biological Chemistry 273 29279–29282.
Price PA & Baukol SA 1980 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 increases synthesis of the vitamin K-dependent bone protein by osteosarcoma cells. Journal of Biological Chemistry 255 11660–11663.
Price PA, Otsuka AA, Poser JW, Kristaponis J & Raman N 1976 Characterization of a gamma-carboxyglutamic acid-containing protein from bone. PNAS 73 1447–1451.
Samuelsson L, Stromberg K, Vikman K, Bjursell G & Enerback S 1991 The CCAAT/enhancer binding protein and its role in adipocyte differentiation: evidence for direct involvement in terminal adipocyte development. EMBO Journal 10 3787–3793.[Web of Science][Medline]
Stein B & Yang MX 1995 Repression of the interleukin-6 promoter by estrogen receptor is mediated by NF-kappa B and C/EBP beta. Molecular and Cellular Biology 15 4971–4979.[Abstract]
Sterneck E, Tessarollo L & Johnson PF 1997 An essential role for C/EBPbeta in female reproduction. Genes and Development 11 2153–2162.
Sudo H, Kodama HA, Amagai Y, Yamamoto S & Kasai S 1983 In vitro differentiation and calcification in a new clonal osteogenic cell line derived from newborn mouse calvaria. Journal of Cell Biology 96 191–198.
Tanaka T, Akira S, Yoshida K, Umemoto M, Yoneda Y, Shirafuji N, Fujiwara H, Suematsu S, Yoshida N & Kishimoto T 1995 Targeted disruption of the NF-IL6 gene discloses its essential role in bacteria killing and tumor cytotoxicity by macrophages. Cell 80 353–361.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Tanaka T, Yoshida N, Kishimoto T & Akira S 1997 Defective adipocyte differentiation in mice lacking the C/EBPbeta and/or C/EBPdelta gene. EMBO Journal 16 7432–7443.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Thomas MJ, Umayahara Y, Shu H, Centrella M, Rotwein P & McCarthy TL 1996 Identification of the cAMP response element that controls transcriptional activation of the insulin-like growth factor-I gene by prostaglandin E2 in osteoblasts. Journal of Biological Chemistry 271 21835–21841.
Umayahara Y, Ji C, Centrella M, Rotwein P & McCarthy TL 1997 CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein delta activates insulin-like growth factor-I gene transcription in osteoblasts. Identification of a novel cyclic AMP signaling pathway in bone. Journal of Biological Chemistry 272 31793–31800.
Umek RM, Friedman AD & McKnight SL 1991 CCAAT-enhancer binding protein: a component of a differentiation switch. Science 251 288–292.
Wedel A & Ziegler-Heitbrock HW 1995 The C/EBP family of transcription factors. Immunobiology 193 171–185.[Web of Science][Medline]
Zhang R, Ducy P & Karsenty G 1997 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 inhibits osteocalcin expression in mouse through an indirect mechanism. Journal of Biological Chemistry 272 110–116.
Received in final form 18 February 2006
Accepted 6 March 2006
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  H. Tominaga, S. Maeda, M. Hayashi, S. Takeda, S. Akira, S. Komiya, T. Nakamura, H. Akiyama, and T. Imamura CCAAT/Enhancer-binding Protein {beta} Promotes Osteoblast Differentiation by Enhancing Runx2 Activity with ATF4 Mol. Biol. Cell, December 1, 2008; 19(12): 5373 - 5386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. E. Aubin, R. Bouillon, T. A. Guise, and I. R. Reid Meeting Report from the 17th Scientific Meeting of the International Bone and Mineral Society: June 24-29, 2007 in Montreal, Quebec, Canada IBMS BoneKEy, November 1, 2007; 4(11): 299 - 313. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
