| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 Division of Clinical Immunology,
2 Department of Genetics and Pathology,
3 Division of Biomedical Radiation Sciences, Rudbeck Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
4 Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Uppsala, Sweden
5 Department of Endocrine Oncology, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
(Requests for offprints should be addressed to V Giandomenico; Email: valeria.giandomenico{at}klinimm.uu.se)
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMaterials and methodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
15. Exon 15 does not contain an even multiple of three nucleotides. As a consequence, there is a shift of reading frame, and exon 16 is translated in an alternative reading frame, yielding a novel protein with a shorter and unrelated C-terminus compared with the native VMAT1 protein. VMAT1 and VMAT115 mRNAs are simultaneously expressed in normal and neoplastic neuroendocrine cells of the GI tract. However, VMAT1 expression is always higher than VMAT115 expression. We prove that VMAT115 is not localized in large, dense core vesicles as the native form but in the endoplasmic reticulum. Furthermore, while VMAT1 can take up serotonin, VMAT115 cannot, indicating different functions for the two forms of VMAT1.
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and methodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Two closely related isoforms of human vesicular monoamine transporters (VMATs) have been described and named: VMAT1 and VMAT2 (Erickson et al. 1996). They are, together with the vesicular acetylcholine transporter (VAChT), members of the vesicular amine transporters (VATs) protein family. The VATs are expressed as integral proteins in the lipid bilayer membrane of secretory vesicles, where they transport biogenic amines and acetylcholine respectively. Transport of positively charged amines by members of the VATs family utilizes an electrochemical gradient across the vesicular membrane that is established by proton pumping. Protons are accumulated in the vesicles via a vacuolar ATPase not physically associated with the transporter (Parsons 2000). VMAT1 and VMAT2 have distinct tissue distribution and pharmacologic properties; VMAT1 expression is confined to EC cells of the gut and adrenal medulla and VMAT2 expression to neuronal cell populations and adrenal medulla (Erickson et al. 1996, Erickson & Varoqui 2000, Krantz et al. 2000, Jakobsen et al. 2001).
Secretory granules are specialized intracellular organelles that serve as a storage pool for selected secretory products. LDCVs are the functional equivalent of the secretory granules in which endocrine and neuroendocrine cells store peptide hormones. Sorting and storage during secretory granule biogenesis have been investigated for a long time but are not fully elucidated yet. Today we know that the initial assembly begins in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), which is the common point of entry for newly synthesized exportable proteins. The next step in this pathway is entrance into the Golgi and trans-Golgi network. Whether exit from the ER is rate limiting or not is not clear yet. However, it is certain that delivery of different proteins to different destinations involves processes collectively known as protein sorting and delivering. During this process, membrane proteins of secretory granules, such as VMATs, require sorting signals for granule membrane targeting. The best evidence for sorting signals on granule membrane proteins comes from studies of a few model proteins in which the important signal is localized in the cytoplasmic C-terminus part of the proteins (Arvan & Castle 1998).
The predicted secondary structure of VMAT1, as for the other VATs proteins, reveals 12 transmembrane domains (TMD) with both the N-terminus and the C-terminus parts in the cytoplasm (Erickson et al. 1992, 1996, Liu et al. 1992, Eiden et al. 2004). VMAT1 contains aspartate (D) residues in TMDs 1, 10 and 11 that are thought to be critical for substrate recognition and transport (Eiden et al. 2004). The cytoplasmic C-terminus of all VATs contain sequences required for potentially phosphorylation-dependent trafficking to the correct vesicles; that is, synaptic-like microvesicles (SLMVs) for VAChT and LDCVs for VMATs. These sequences may also be important for recycling of the proteins via endocytosis and for phosphorylation that may control other aspects of the proteins (Liu et al. 1999). VAChT contains a C-terminal, cytoplasmic dileucine (LL) motif, while VMATs contain a dileucine-like (IL) motif for internalization into plasma membrane (Liu et al. 1999). VAChT contains serine (S) five residues upstream of the dileucine motif, while VMATs contain glutamate (E). These residue motifs appear to be of major importance to localize the protein in the proper vesicle (Krantz et al. 2000).
Classical midgut carcinoids are rare tumors arising from the ECs in the mucosa of jejunum, ileum, cecum and ascending colon of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. The clinical features are related to secretion of humoral factors, such as serotonin, tachykinins, bradykinins and prostaglandins (Oberg 2002, 2003, Oberg et al. 2004a,b). Classical midgut serotonin-producing carcinoid tumors express predominantly VMAT1, while endocrine histamine-producing tumors almost exclusively express VMAT2 (Jakobsen et al. 2001). We have previously investigated VMAT1 gene expression and tissue distribution in midgut carcinoid specimens and in normal tissues (Vikman et al. 2005). During this analysis, we identified a novel shorter splicing variant of the VMAT1 gene that lacks exon 15 and that we now denote VMAT115. The number of nucleotides in exon 15 is not an even multiple of three. As a consequence, there is a shift of reading frame, and exon 16 (the last coding exon) is translated in an alternative reading frame, yielding a shorter and unrelated C-terminus of VMAT115 compared with the native VMAT1 protein. Here we show that VMAT115 appears to have a different cellular function from VMAT1, probably as a result of its different structure, conformation and cellular localization.
|
Materials and methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and methodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
The chemicals and suppliers used were as follows: PIPES, L-ascorbic acid, MgATP, pargyline hydrochloride, 5-HT, BSA, potassium tartrate, CHAPS, DTT and EDTA (Sigma); Digitonin (Serva, Heidelberg, Germany); CaCl2 and glucose monohydrate (VWR International, Stockholm, Sweden); and [3H]5-HT (PerkinElmer, Boston, MA, USA).
Cell culture
The human endocrine pancreatic tumor cell line BON, a generous gift from Prof. J C Thompson, Galveston, TX, USA, was cultured in DMEM (Dulbecco’s MEM with Glutamax-I) and F12 K nutrient mixture (Kaighn’s modification) at a 1:1 ratio, supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1 mM sodium pyruvate. The monkey kidney cell line CV-1, a generous gift from Dr J Ericsson, LICR, Uppsala, Sweden, was cultured in DMEM, supplemented with 10% FBS, 1 mM sodium pyruvate and 0.1 mM nonessential amino acids. All cell culture reagents were from Invitrogen.
Tumor specimens
Tumor specimens from 15 patients diagnosed with midgut carcinoid tumor at the Department of Endocrine Oncology, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden, were included in the study. From two patients, we had both primary tumors and metastases, obtained at different times, while the rest of the primary and metastasis specimens were from independent patients. The study was approved by the local ethics committee (Dnr Ups 02–077).
Reverse transcription (RT)–PCR
Total RNAs were isolated from BON cells and flash-frozen midgut carcinoid specimens with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. An amount of 2 µg of each RNA sample was subjected to cDNA synthesis with Superscript RNase H– reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. PCR was performed on cDNA from BON cells, 15 midgut carcinoid specimens (10 primary tumors and 5 metastases) and commercially available cDNA from normal tissues (Clontech). PCR amplification was performed for 35 cycles with VMAT1 forward 5'-GGC ACC TGG TGG ATC TAC GCC ACA-3' (exon 14) and VMAT1 reverse 5'-TGC GGC ACC AAG GCA TAG AGG AAG A-3' (exon 16) primers. PCR products were analyzed on ethidium bromide (EtBr)-stained 1% agarose gels.
Quantitative real-time PCR
Total RNAs from 12 midgut carcinoid specimens (6 primary tumors and 6 metastases) and BON cells were extracted and reverse transcribed as described above. The cDNAs were analyzed for the expression of VMAT1 and VMAT115. Gene-specific PCR products were continuously measured by the iCycler IQ real-time detection system (Bio-Rad) during 40 cycles with iQ SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad). The following primers were used in the study: Q-RT VMAT1/15 forward 5'-GGT GGA TTC TTC TAT GAT GCC C-3' (exon 14), Q-RT VMAT1 reverse 5'-GTG GAT GGA CCT ATA GCA AAG C-3' (exon 15/exon 16 boundary), Q-RT VMAT115 reverse 5'-CTC AGA ATA GCC TAT AGC AAA GC- 3' (exon 14/exon 16 boundary), Q-RT GAPDH forward 5'-CCC ATG TTC GTC ATG GGT GT-3' and Q-RT GAPDH reverse 5'-TGG TCA TGA GTC CTT CCA CGA TA-3'. The data were evaluated by the 2- CT method (Livak & Schmittgen 2001), using the mRNA level of GAPDH (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) from each individual sample for normalization, that is,
 |
The plotted data represent the ratio between VMAT115 and VMAT1; that is, the percentage of VMAT115 mRNA expression in relation to VMAT1 mRNA expression.
Plasmid constructions
The following primers were used to amplify the entire coding sequences of VMAT1 and VMAT115: V-cloning forward 5'-GGC CAG ATC TAT GCT CCG GAC CAT TCT GGA-3' and V-cloning reverse 5'-CCT TCT CGA GCT ACT CCT CAT GGT CAG GCT-3'. PCR amplification was performed with Expand High Fidelity Enzyme (Roche). The thermocycling protocol was as follows: initial denaturation at 94° C for 3 min followed by 10 cycles of denaturation at 94 ° C for 30 s, annealing at 56 ° C for 30 s and elongation at 72 ° C for 2 min. Then, 15 cycles of denaturation at 94 ° C for 30 s, annealing at 56 ° C for 30 s and elongation at 72 ° C for 2 min with 15 s added to the elongation time for each cycle. The final extension was at 72 ° C for 7 min. The two PCR products were isolated from a low melting temperature agarose gel, purified with the QIAquick Extraction Kit (Qiagen) and ligated into pCR2.1 (Invitrogen) by means of T/A cloning. The VMAT1 and VMAT115 coding sequences were then subcloned into pCDNA3 (Invitrogen) for in vitro transcription of VMAT1 and VMAT115 mRNA. They were also subcloned into pEGFP-C2 (Clontech) to produce EGFP-VMAT1 and EGFP-VMAT115 fusion proteins with the EGFP sequence at the N-terminus. All constructs were sequenced and verified on an automated capillary sequencer.
In vitro transcription-coupled translation
35S-Met-labeled VMAT1 and VMAT115 proteins were produced by in vitro transcription-coupled translation from pcDNA3-VMAT1 and pcDNA3-VMAT115 with the TnT Quick Coupled Transcription/Translation Systems (Promega) and Redivue L 35S-methionine (Amersham) according to manufacturers’ protocols. Samples were resolved by electrophoresis on 12% SDS–PAGE. The gel was dried and subjected to autoradiography.
Western blot
BON cells were homogenized in ice-cold lysis buffer (10 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 6.8, containing 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM CHAPS, 1 mM DTT and complete Mini protease inhibitor cocktail tablets (Roche)). Homogenates were sonicated twice for 20 s and cleared by centrifugation for 10 min at 10 000 g. The supernatants were assayed for protein concentration with Coomassie Plus protein assay reagent (Pierce, Erembodegen, Belgium). Aliquots of 50 µg were resolved by SDS–PAGE, and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-Rad). The BenchMark Prestained Protein Ladder (Invitrogen) was used to calculate the apparent size of proteins. The membranes were incubated with the rabbit polyclonal anti-VMAT1 antibody (H-100, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) for 48 h, washed and incubated with the horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-coupled anti-mouse/rabbit IgG-POD antibodies (Roche). After being washed, the blots were visualized with the western blotting chemiluminescence luminol reagent (Roche). The membranes were stripped and reprobed with goat polyclonal anti-actin (I-19; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), washed and incubated with HRP-coupled donkey antigoat IgG (sc-2020; Santa Cruz Biotechnology). The blots were visualized with Western blotting chemiluminescence luminol reagent (Santa Cruz Biotechnology).
Immunoprecipitation
Aliquots of 1 mg total protein lysates from BON cells were incubated with 2 µg rabbit polyclonal anti-VMAT1 antibody (H-100; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for 90 min on end-over-end at 4 °C. The antibody was raised against N-terminus peptides of the VMAT1 protein and should in theory be able to detect both VMAT1 and VMAT115. Then, 30 µl protein G Sepharose (Amersham) were added and the incubation continued for 60 min. Immunocomplexes were washed four times with RIPA buffer (10 mM Tris–HCL (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 0.5% deoxycholic acid, 0.1% SDS and complete Mini protease inhibitor cocktail tablets (Roche)), resolved by 8% SDS–PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-Rad). The BenchMark Prestained Protein Ladder (Invitrogen) was used to calculate the apparent size of proteins. The membranes were incubated for 48 h with the primary goat polyclonal anti-VMAT1 antibody (N19; Santa Cruz Biotechnology). The secondary antibody was HRP-coupled donkey antigoat IgG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). The antigoat antibody cannot detect heavy and light chains of the rabbit antibody used for immunoprecipitation. The results were visualized with Western blotting chemiluminescence luminal reagent (Santa Cruz Biotechnology).
Transfection, immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy analyses
BON cells were plated on microscope glass cover slips in six-well plates, transfected with pEGFP-C2, pEGFP-VMAT1 and pEGFP-VMAT115 by using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Cells were cultured for 24 h before analysis. For immunofluorescence analyses, the transfected cells on cover slips were washed in PBS and fixed in buffered 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min at RT. The cover slips were mounted on glass object slides with Fluoromont G (Immunkemi, Stockholm, Sweden). Cells were photographed with a Hamamatsu ORCA CCD digital camera, using the QED Imaging System software with a Zeiss Axioplan2 microscope. For confocal microscopy analyses, the transfected cells on cover slips were washed in PBS, fixed and permeabilized in 0.2% Triton-X100 in PBS. They were then washed in PBS and incubated in 10 mM glycine in PBS. Primary and secondary antibodies were diluted in PBS containing 5% calf serum. Cells were incubated with a primary rabbit antihuman chromogranin A antibody (DAKO, Copenhagen, Denmark) followed by a secondary TRITC-conjugated antirabbit antibody (DAKO) with three PBS washing steps between. The cover slips were mounted on glass object slides with Fluoromont G. A Zeiss 510 META instrument (Zeiss AB, Stockholm, Sweden) with Axiovert 200 microscope stand was used for all VMAT1 and VMAT115 colocalization studies. DAPI or Hoechst 33342 was exited with 405 nm, GFP with 488 nm and TRITC with 534 nm laser lines. Emission was detected by appropriate band-pass filters. Endoplasmic reticulum analyses were performed on live BON cells with 100 nM ER-Tracker Blue-White DPX (E-12353; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA), a photo stable probe that is selective for the ER in live cells. Nontransfected and transfected cells were then grown and stained on cover slips placed in medium in a POC-R cultivation chamber (Zeiss). All images were acquired at 63 magnification. For each image, a Z-series was acquired in multitracking mode, and images are presented as single projections. Colocalization between EGFP-VMAT1 or EGFP-VMAT115 and chromogranin A or ER was measured with the colocalization module of the Zeiss LSM 510 software.
[3H]5-HT Uptake in permeabilized CV-1 cells
5-HT uptake was analyzed by a protocol similar to the one published by Erickson et al.(1992). CV-1 cells were transfected with pEGFP-VMAT1 and pEGFP-VMAT115. Transfection was performed as described above for BON cells. Cells were cultured for 24 h before analysis. Transfection efficiency was evaluated on a FACS Calibur (Becton Dickinson, San Diego, CA, USA), and at least 20 000 events were collected for each sample. Cells were then rinsed once with intracellular buffer (20 mM PIPES (pH 6.8) containing 110 mM potassium tartrate, 5 mM glucose, 0.2% bovine serum albumin, 200 µM CaCl2, 1 mM ascorbic acid and 10 µM pargyline). Thereafter, cells were permeabilized in intracellular buffer with 10 µM digitonin for 10 min at 37 ° C. After permeabilization, the medium was replaced with intracellular buffer containing either 5 mM MgATP and [3H]5-HT (0.1 µM, 111 kBq/ml) or 5 mM MgATP, [3H]5-HT (0.1 µM, 111 kBq/ml) and 5-HT (100 µM). Cells were incubated for 5 min at 37 ° C. The uptake was terminated by washing cells with 1 ml cold intracellular buffer and with an additional 1 ml cold PBS. Cells were then trypsinized and counted (Z2; Beckman Coulter Counter, Fullerton, CA, USA), and cell-associated [3H]5-HT was measured in a liquid scintillation counter (1214 RackBeta Excel, LKB-Wallac, Upplands Vasby, Sweden) with Quicksafe A (Zinsser Analytic, Uppsala, Sweden). All the experiments were performed in triplicates. Transfection efficiency was evaluated by direct detection of EGFP on FACS Calibur, and at least 20 000 events were collected for each sample.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and methodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
To clone the full-length coding sequence of VMAT1, we amplified it by PCR from cDNA prepared from BON cells with VMAT1-specific cloning primers. To our surprise, we identified two distinct PCR products on the agarose gel, which were T/A-cloned and sequenced. One product was, as expected, the already known VMAT1 coding sequence, comprising 1575 bp from 16 exons. The second product was shorter, with the first 1330 bp identical to the 5' coding sequence of VMAT1 and the last 111 bp identical to the 3' coding sequence of VMAT1. By analysis of the transcript, the genomic sequence organization and exon/intron boundaries, we concluded that the novel sequence is produced by alternative splicing of VMAT1 where the next to last exon, exon 15, is excluded. We therefore named the novel sequence VMAT115. The number of nucleotides in exon 15 is not an even multiple of three. As a consequence, there is a shift of reading frame, and exon 16 is translated in an alternative reading frame (Fig. 1A
). This means that the putative novel VMAT115 protein has a different and shorter C-terminus than that of the native VMAT1 protein (Fig. 1B). The total number of amino acids for VMAT1 is 525, but it is 472 for VMAT115. The sequences diverge at the end of transmembrane domain 11 of VMAT1, and the VMAT115 protein lacks the dileucine-like motif that is important for proper trafficking to secretory vesicles. Online prediction analyses of transmembrane helices for VMAT1 and VMAT115 (www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM/) reveal that VMAT1 has 12 transmembrane domains with both the N-terminus and the C-terminus in the cytoplasm, while VMAT115 has 11 transmembrane domains with the N-terminus in the cytoplasm. The smaller size of VMAT11 and the lack of a vesicular targeting sequence led us to hypothesize that VMAT115 has a different conformation and possibly a different cellular localization from VMAT1 (Fig. 1C).
|
15 gene expression in BON cells, midgut carcinoids and normal tissues
After having identified the VMAT115 transcript in BON cells, we wanted to determine whether the transcript is expressed also in normal cells. We therefore analyzed cDNA from normal GI-tract tissues, which are known to express VMAT1, using PCR primers designed in exons 14 and 16 of VMAT1. We found that VMAT1 and VMAT115 are simultaneously expressed in these tissues with an apparently higher expression of VMAT1 relative to VMAT115 (Fig. 2A). We next analyzed the differential expression of VMAT1 and VMAT115 in midgut carcinoid specimens and BON cells, and found a simultaneous expression profile (Fig. 2B). Since VMAT1 expression appears to be significantly higher than VMAT115 expression in all tissues studied, we went on to perform quantitative real-time RT–PCR analysis. We analyzed six primary midgut carcinoid tumors, six midgut carcinoid metastases and BON cells. The relative expression of VMAT115 in relation to VMAT1 varied from 4.2% to 22.8% among the carcinoid specimens as evaluated by the 2- CT method (Fig. 3). No general trend in the ratio was observed when comparing primary tumors (Fig. 3A) with metastases (Fig. 3B). From this analysis, we could not determine whether their relative expression is important for the malignant transformation of neuroendocrine cells. However, in two cases (C12 and C16) where primary tumors and metastases were obtained from the same patients, it was apparent that VMAT1 15 expression in relation to VMAT1 expression is higher in the metastases than in the primary tumors.
|
|
15 protein expression
After having characterized the VMAT115 transcript, we verified that the novel VMAT115 transcript could be translated into a protein of expected size by in vitro transcription-coupled translation (Fig. 4A). Thereafter, we set out to detect the endogenous VMAT115 protein. A commercial antibody raised against an epitope in the N-terminus part of the protein, shared by VMAT1 and VMAT115, detected only one band in total lysate from BON cells by western blot analyses, presumably the native form of VMAT1, but failed to detect the smaller VMAT115 protein (Fig. 4B). However, when combining immunoprecipitation with western blotting, starting from as much as 1–2 mg proteins from total lysate of BON cells, we finally managed to detect two bands, presumably VMAT1 and VMAT115 (Fig. 4C). In this case, a rabbit polyclonal anti-VMAT1 antibody was used for immunoprecipitation, and a goat polyclonal anti-VMAT1 antibody was used for detection.
|
15 is localized not in vesicles but in the ER of transfected BON cells
Considering that the LDCV targeting sequence at the C-terminus part of VMAT1, with the dileucine-like motif and two glutamate residues in positions –4 and –5, is absent in VMAT115, we proceeded to investigate the cellular localization of VMAT115. In order to do so, BON cells were transiently transfected with pEGFP-C2, pEGFP-VMAT1 or pEGFP-VMAT115. The expressed fusion proteins were evaluated by Western blot analysis, resulting in the expected sizes (data not shown). Immunofluorescence microscopy revealed that EGFP-VMAT1 stained LDCV-like structures in the transfected cells, while EGFP-VMAT115 was not distributed in the same vesicles but instead showed cytoplasmic membrane-like staining (Fig. 5A). EGFP was unspecifically located in the cytoplasm of the transfected cells, showing that the EGFP tag did not interfere with the normal protein localization.
|
15 were colocalizing with the vesicular marker chromogranin A. The confocal microscopy analysis results shown in Fig. 5B
illustrate the distribution of chromogranin A (red) and either EGFP-VMAT1 (green) or EGFP-VMAT115 (green). As expected, the distribution of chromogranin A was naturally granular, as was generally the EGFP-VMAT1 distribution, with a partial overlap when the two images were merged (yellow). For EGFP-VMAT115, the degree of colocalization was significantly lower, and the expression pattern again appeared to be associated with cytoplasmic membrane structures, indicating ER targeting. This was taken as a further proof of different cellular localization of the two proteins. Extended analyses of subcellular localization were performed on transfected cells with fluorescent molecules targeting intracellular organelles. Staining of the ER (red) in combination with EGFP-VMAT1 (green) expression revealed few areas of yellow, indicating poor colocalization, while for EGFP-VMAT115 (green) there were extensive yellow areas, indicating substantial colocalization. Furthermore, neither EGFP-VMAT1 nor EGFP-VMAT115 colocalized with Golgi staining (data not shown).
VMAT1-transfected, but not VMAT115-transfected, CV-1 can take up 5-HT
Considering the different conformation and distribution of VMAT115 and VMAT1, we next investigated the serotonin (5-HT) uptake capacity, that is, the transporting capacity, of the two proteins in digitonin-permeabilized CV-1 cells. We measured and compared [3H]5-HT uptake in pEGFP-VMAT1-transfected, pEGFP-VMAT115-transfected and nontransfected CV-1 cells. Transfection efficiencies were evaluated by flow cytometry, yielding 30% EGFP-VMAT1-positive cells and 26% EGFP-VMAT115-positive cells (Fig. 6A). The results from the [3H]5-HT uptake studies, corrected for transfection efficiency, are shown in Fig. 6B. Specific [3H]5-HT uptake was obtained by the EGFP-VMAT1-transfected CV-1 cells, since the uptake was readily competed by a 1000 molar excess of nonlabeled 5-HT. No uptake of [3H]5-HT was obtained by the EGFP-VMAT115-transfected cells. As expected, CV-1 cells were not able to take up [3H]5-HT since they do not express VMAT1.
|
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and methodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
15. We showed that VMAT1 and VMAT115 have similar gene expression profile in normal tissues of the GI tract and carcinoid tumors, and that VMAT1 expression in all cases is higher than VMAT115 expression. Whether the relative expression of the two forms is changed during the malignant transformation requires a more detailed analysis, using a larger number of primary tumors and metastases from the same patients. However, analysis of the primary tumors and metastases from two patients shows that the relative expression changes with a relative increase in VMAT115 expression during carcinoid progression.
The physical description of VMAT1 predicts that it has 12 transmembrane domains and that the N-terminus and C-terminus parts are cytoplasmic (Eiden et al. 2004). The cytoplasmic C-terminus of the other VAT proteins, that is, VAChT and VMAT2, have been shown to contain sequences required for localizing the proteins to the correct vesicle type (Varoqui & Erickson 1998a,b, Erickson & Varoqui 2000). In PC12 cells, the VAChT localizes preferentially to SLMVs, whereas the closely related VMAT2 localizes preferentially to LDCVs (Liu et al. 1994, Liu & Edwards 1997). VMAT1 contains a homologous motif to VMAT2 in the C-terminus part of the protein, consisting of a dileucine-like motif with two glutamate residues in positions –4 and –5. This short sequence is needed for protein trafficking and localization (Liu et al. 1999, Krantz et al. 2000). The C-terminus part of the protein predicted to be encoded by the VMAT115 transcript does not contain this sequence and is therefore unable to target LDCVs. By using EGFP-fusion proteins, we show that EGFP-VMAT1 is, as expected, located in secretory vesicles with a partial colocalization with the neuroendocrine secretory vesicle marker chromogranin A (Kim et al. 2001). EGFP-VMAT115 did not colocalize with chromogranin A but showed a high degree of colocalization with the ER. The retention of VMAT115 in the ER may simply be the consequence of a lack of a vesicle target signal, since VMAT115 lacks the classical ER retention signal KDEL (Stornaiuolo et al. 2003). Furthermore, VMAT115 does not contain any of the motifs lately recognized for ER targeting, such as AIAKE or HIEL (Wrzeszczynski & Rost 2004, Gilham et al. 2005).
The regulation of monoamine transporter activity has a pivotal role in the physiology of normal and cancer cells. The transport properties of VMAT1 and VMAT2 have previously been determined in transfected digitonin-permeabilized CV-1 cells (Erickson et al. 1996). The ability of these cells to support transport of mono-amines and the energetic requirements of this process shows that these transporters are targeted to intracellular compartments that contain an electrogenic vacuolar type H+ pump (Erickson et al. 1996). Since we had already shown that VMAT115 is not able to target the same vesicles as VMAT1, we wanted to investigate whether VMAT115 could take up serotonin. We studied [3H]5-HT uptake capacity in digitonin-permeabilized CV-1 cells transiently transfected to express either EGFP-VMAT1 or EGFP-VMAT115. We confirmed the ability of VMAT1 to take up [3H]5-HT and showed that VMAT115 is unable to take up [3H]5-HT. We believe that the different capacities in serotonin uptake are due to the different C-terminus of the proteins, which leads to targeting of different cellular compartments. The importance of vesicle proteins in the diagnosis and treatment of neuroendocrine tumors has been discussed, and recently it was demonstrated that VMAT1 is important for the uptake of 123I-MIGB in tumor cells (Kolby et al. 2003, Nilsson et al. 2004). This compound has an important role in scintigraphy and radionuclide therapy of neuroendocrine tumors, but whether a relative increase of VMAT115 expression in relation to VMAT1 affects this uptake is not known.
Previous studies have demonstrated the biologic relevance of alternative splicing in health and disease. Although alternative splicing of different genes has been considered to be associated with different stages of tumorigenesis, and splicing variants have been characterized as tumors markers, it is still not clear whether this is a common phenomenon or not (Kirschbaum-Slager et al. 2004). Recently, various studies have shown that different subcellular association of different splice isoforms depend on unique sequences present in tail anchors (Yao et al. 2004, van Herpen et al. 2005). A more detailed expression profile of the two VMAT1 isoforms in classical serotonin-producing midgut carcinoid tumors awaits the availability of isoform-specific antibodies.
In summary, we have identified and characterized a novel alternative splicing form of VMAT1, denoted VMAT115, which yields a novel protein with different localization and function from VMAT1. Further investigation is needed to determine whether the regulation of VMAT1 function is due to some kind of equilibrium between the two forms of VMAT1 in both normal and malignant tissue. This might be of importance to understand VMAT1 gene regulation and to develop new drugs.
|
Acknowledgements |
|---|
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and methodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Eiden LE, Schafer MK, Weihe E & Schutz B 2004 The vesicular amine transporter family (SLC18): amine/proton antiporters required for vesicular accumulation and regulated exocytotic secretion of monoamines and acetylcholine. Pflugers Archives 447 636–640.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Erickson JD & Varoqui H 2000 Molecular analysis of vesicular amine transporter function and targeting to secretory organelles. FASEB Journal 14 2450–2458.
Erickson JD, Eiden LE & Hoffman BJ 1992 Expression cloning of a reserpine-sensitive vesicular monoamine transporter. PNAS 89 10993–10997.
Erickson JD, Schafer MK, Bonner TI, Eiden LE & Weihe E 1996 Distinct pharmacological properties and distribution in neurons and endocrine cells of two isoforms of the human vesicular monoamine transporter. PNAS 93 5166–5171.
Gilham D, Alam M, Gao W, Vance DE & Lehner R 2005 Triacylglycerol hydrolase is localized to the endoplasmic reticulum by an unusual retrieval sequence where It participates in VLDL assembly without utilizing VLDL lipids as substrates. Molecular Biology of Cell 16 984–996.
Jakobsen AM, Andersson P, Saglik G, Andersson E, Kolby L, Erickson JD, Forssell-Aronsson E, Wangberg B, Ahlman H & Nilsson O 2001 Differential expression of vesicular monoamine transporter (VMAT) 1 and 2 in gastrointestinal endocrine tumours. Journal of Pathology 195 463–472.
Kim T, Tao-Cheng JH, Eiden LE & Loh YP 2001 Chromogranin A, an ‘on/off’ switch controlling dense-core secretory granule biogenesis. Cell 106 499–509.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Kirschbaum-Slager N, Lopes GM, Galante PA, Riggins GJ & de Souza SJ 2004 Splicing factors are differentially expressed in tumors. Genetics and Molecular Research 3 512–520.
Kolby L, Bernhardt P, Levin-Jakobsen AM, Johanson V, Wangberg B, Ahlman H, Forssell-Aronsson E & Nilsson O 2003 Uptake of meta-iodobenzylguanidine in neuroendocrine tumours is mediated by vesicular monoamine transporters. British Journal of Cancer 89 1383–1388.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Krantz DE, Waites C, Oorschot V, Liu Y, Wilson RI, Tan PK, Klumperman J & Edwards RH 2000 A phosphorylation site regulates sorting of the vesicular acetylcholine transporter to dense core vesicles. Journal of Cell Biology 149 379–396.
Liu Y & Edwards RH 1997 Differential localization of vesicular acetylcholine and monoamine transporters in PC12 cells but not CHO cells. Journal of Cell Biology 139 907–916.
Liu Y, Peter D, Roghani A, Schuldiner S, Prive GG, Eisenberg D, Brecha N & Edwards RH 1992 A cDNA that suppresses MPP+ toxicity encodes a vesicular amine transporter. Cell 70 539–551.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Liu Y, Schweitzer ES, Nirenberg MJ, Pickel VM, Evans CJ & Edwards RH 1994 Preferential localization of a vesicularmonoamine transporter to dense core vesicles in PC12 cells. Journal of Cell Biology 127 1419–1433.
Liu Y, Krantz DE, Waites C & Edwards RH 1999 Membrane trafficking of neurotransmitter transporters in the regulation of synaptic transmission. Trends in Cell Biology 9 356–363.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Livak KJ & Schmittgen TD 2001 Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods 25 402–408.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Nilsson O, Jakobsen AM, Kolby L, Bernhardt P, Forssell-Aronsson E & Ahlman H 2004 Importance of vesicle proteins in the diagnosis and treatment of neuroendocrine tumors. Annals of New York Academy of Sciences 1014 280–283.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Oberg K 2002 Carcinoid tumors: molecular genetics, tumor biology, and update of diagnosis and treatment. Current Opinion in Oncology 14 38–45.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Oberg K 2003 Diagnosis and treatment of carcinoid tumors. Expert Reviews in Anticancer Therapy 3 863–877.[CrossRef]
Oberg K, Astrup L, Eriksson B, Falkmer SE, Falkmer UG, Gustafsen J, Haglund C, Knigge U, Vatn MH & Vä limäki M 2004a Guidelines for the management of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (including bronchopulmonary and thymic neoplasms). II. Specific NE tumour types. Acta Oncologica 43 626–636.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Oberg K, Kvols L, Caplin M, Delle Fave G, De Herder W, Rindi G, Ruszniewski P, Woltering EA & Wiedenmann B 2004b Consensus report on the use of somatostatin analogs for the management of neuroendocrine tumors of the gastroentero-pancreatic system. Annals of Oncology 15 966–973.
Parsons SM 2000 Transport mechanisms in acetylcholine and monoamine storage. FASEB Journal 14 2423–2434.
Schafermeyer A, Gratzl M, Rad R, Dossumbekova A, Sachs G & Prinz C 2004 Isolation and receptor profiling of ileal enterochromaffin cells. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica 182 53–62.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Stornaiuolo M, Lotti LV, Borgese N, Torrisi MR, Mottola G, Martire G & Bonatti S 2003 KDEL and KKXX retrieval signals appended to the same reporter protein determine different trafficking between endoplasmic reticulum, intermediate compartment, and Golgi complex. Molecular Biology of Cell 14 889–902.
van Herpen RE, Oude Ophuis RJ, Wijers M, Bennink MB, van de Loo FA, Fransen J, Wieringa B & Wansink DG 2005 Divergent mitochondrial and endoplasmic reticulum association of DMPK splice isoforms depends on unique sequence arrangements in tail anchors. Molecular and Cellular Biology 25 1402–1414.
Varoqui H & Erickson JD 1998a The cytoplasmic tail of the vesicular acetylcholine transporter contains a synaptic vesicle targeting signal. Journal of Biological Chemistry 273 9094–9098.
Varoqui H & Erickson JD 1998b Dissociation of the vesicular acetylcholine transporter domains important for high-affinity transport recognition, binding of vesamicol and targeting to synaptic vesicles. Journal of Physiology, Paris 92 141–144.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Vikman S, Essand M, Cunningham J, de la Torre M, Öberg K, Tötterman TH & Giandomenico V 2005 Gene expression in midgut carcinoid tumors: potential targets for immunotherapy. Acta Oncologica 44 32–40.[Web of Science][Medline]
Wrzeszczynski KO & Rost B 2004 Annotating proteins from endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi apparatus in eukaryotic proteomes. Cellular and Molecular Life Science 61 1341–1353.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Yao J, Erickson JD & Hersh LB 2004 Protein kinase A affects trafficking of the vesicular monoamine transporters in PC12 cells. Traffic 5 1006–1016.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Received 9 August 2005
Accepted 13 September 2005
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. Leja, H. Dzojic, E. Gustafson, K. Oberg, V. Giandomenico, and M. Essand A Novel Chromogranin-A Promoter-Driven Oncolytic Adenovirus for Midgut Carcinoid Therapy Clin. Cancer Res., April 15, 2007; 13(8): 2455 - 2462. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
