JME Society for Endocrinology Archive
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Molecular Endocrinology (2005) 34 517-534    DOI: 10.1677/jme.1.01550
© 2005 Society for Endocrinology

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hombach-Klonisch, S
Right arrow Articles by Klonisch, T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hombach-Klonisch, S
Right arrow Articles by Klonisch, T

Regulation of functional steroid receptors and ligand-induced responses in telomerase-immortalized human endometrial epithelial cells

S Hombach-Klonisch1, A Kehlen2, P A Fowler3, B Huppertz4, J F Jugert5, G Bischoff6, E Schlüter1, J Buchmann7 and T Klonisch1

1 Department of Human Anatomy and Cell Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
2 Department of Immunology, Martin Luther University, Halle-Wittenberg, Germany
3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
4 Department of Anatomy, RWTH Aachen, Germany
5 Department of Dermatology, RWTH Aachen, Germany
6 Department of Analytical and Environmental Chemistry, Martin Luther University, Halle-Wittenberg, Germany
7 Department of Pathology, Martin Luther University, Halle-Wittenberg, Germany

(Requests for offprints should be addressed to T Klonisch, Department of Human Anatomy and Cell Science, Faculty of Medicine, 130 Basic Medical Sciences, 730 Williams Avenue, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E 0W3, Canada; Email: klonisch{at}cc.umanitoba.ca)


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Information on the regulation of steroid hormone receptors and their distinct functions within the human endometrial epithelium is largely unavailable. We have immortalized human primary endometrial epithelial cells (EECs) isolated from a normal proliferative phase endometrium by stably transfecting the catalytic subunit (hTERT) of the human telomerase complex and cultured these hTERT-EECs now for over 350 population doublings. Active hTERT was detected in hTERT-EECs employing the telomerase repeat amplification assay protocol. hTERT-EECs revealed a polarized, non-invasive epithelial phenotype with apical microvilli and production of a basal lamina when grown on a three-dimensional collagen–fibroblast lattice. Employing atomic force microscopy, living hTERT-EECs were shown to produce extracellular matrix (ECM) components and ECM secretion was modified by estrogen and progesterone (P4). hTERT-EECs expressed inducible and functional endogenous estrogen receptor-alpha (ER-alpha) as demonstrated by estrogen response element reporter assays and induction of P4 receptor (PR). P4 treatment down-regulated PR expression, induced MUC-1 gene activity and resulted in increased ER-beta transcriptional activity. Gene activities of cytokines and their receptors interleukin (IL)-6, leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), IL-11 and IL-6 receptor (IL6-R), LIF receptor and gp130 relevant to implantation revealed a 17 beta-estradiol (E2)-mediated up-regulation of IL-6 and an E2- and P4-mediated up-regulation of IL6-R in hTERT-EECs. Thus, hTERT-EECs may be regarded as a novel in vitro model to investigate the role of human EECs in steroid hormone-dependent normal physiology and pathologies, including implantation failure, endometriosis and endometrial cancer.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The monthly recurrent remodeling of the human endometrium in preparation for embryonic implantation is under the control of the ovarian steroid hormones estrogen and progesterone (P4), which profoundly affect proliferation and differentiation of endometrial cells in a time- and concentration-dependent manner. Disturbances in this intricate endocrine network can result in altered responses of the stromal and epithelial endometrial cell compartments, leading to severe clinical conditions, including implantation failure, endometriosis and endometrial carcinoma (Brandenberger et al. 1999, Jazaeri et al. 2001, Kitawaki et al. 2002, Utsunomiya et al. 2003). Unique even among primates, studies on the molecular dynamics of the human endometrium require appropriate human cellular in vitro model systems. Primary human endometrial monolayers in culture have limited lifespan and undergo cellular de-differentiation (Mulholland et al. 1988, Zhang et al. 1995, Classen-Linke et al. 1997, Arnold et al. 2001, Grümmer et al. 2001). Together with problems obtaining normal human endometrial tissue, this restricts the use of isolated human endometrial cells or endometrial tissues for experimental in vitro approaches.

Endometrial carcinoma cell lines, including ECC-1, HEC-1A, RL-95, Ishikawa and EN, have long been employed as experimental models but their usefulness is limited since their transformed phenotype has partially resulted in a loss of physiological growth regulation and polarization or altered steroid hormone receptor regulation (Thie et al. 1995, Koopman et al. 1999, Di Nezza et al. 2003, Farnell & Ing 2003, Isaka et al. 2003). In particular, primary endometrial epithelial cells (EECs) display a rapid decrease in proliferative capacity within a few culture passages (Mulholland et al. 1988, Classen-Linke et al. 1997, Arnold et al. 2001). In addition, the process of dedifferentiation includes down-regulation of steroid hormone receptors (Schatz et al. 1990, White et al. 1990). However, due to the lack of experimental models retaining steroid hormone responsiveness there is conflicting evidence on the effects of 17 beta-estradiol (E2) on EECs (Marshburn et al. 1992, Zhang et al. 1995, Dardes et al. 2002).

Recently, hTERT overexpression has been employed as a novel strategy to immortalize human somatic cells, including human uterine leiomyoma and normal myometrial cells, human skin fibroblasts and retinal pigment cells (Bodnar et al. 1998, Counter et al. 1998, Carney et al. 2002). The catalytic subunit hTERT of the ribonucleoprotein telomerase complex is the rate-limiting factor for telomerase activity in normal human somatic cells facilitating the elongation of chromosomal telomeres (Counter et al. 1998). It is highly pertinent that immortalization of human somatic cells by virtue of overexpression of hTERT does not interfere with normal cellular physiology (Jiang et al. 1999, Carney et al. 2002).

In the normal human endometrium, telomerase activity has been exclusively detected during the proliferative phase of the cycle and localized to glandular epithelial cells at the base of the endometrial crypts within the stratum basale (Kyo et al. 1997, Tanaka et al. 1998, Yokoyama et al. 1998). These basal glandular epithelial cells provide a recurrent source for the cellular restitution of the endometrial epithelial lining during the proliferative phase of the cycle. In isolated primary EECs, E2 was unable to sustain telomerase activity, which has been reported to cease within 8 days of culture resulting in the senescence of primary EECs (Varma et al. 1982, Tanaka et al. 1998).

In the present study we present a novel hTERT-immortalized human endometrial epithelial cell line (hTERT-EECs) which displays a stable epithelial phenotype. Hormonally responsive to the actions of ovarian steroid hormones, estrogen receptor (ER)-alpha induced the expression of a functional P4 receptor (PR), which, in turn, affected expression of ER-beta in these immortalized cells. The hTERT-EEC cell line may provide a unique in vitro cellular model to study the molecular endocrine involvement of human EECs in the normal human endometrium and in impaired endometrial function, such as endometriosis and implantation failure.


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Isolation and immortalization of human EECs

Primary EECs were isolated from a healthy human endometrium staged day 7 of the proliferative phase of the cycle based on cycle days and inspection of the endometrium by an experienced gynecopathologist (J B). This study was approved by the University Ethical Committee and the patient had given written, informed, consent. The nulliparous patient, aged 37, had undergone surgery because of uterine myomatosis. A modification of the isolation protocol by Satyaswaroop et al.(1979) was used. Briefly, several endometrial tissue specimens from the region of the uterine corpus were cut into 1–3 mm3 pieces, washed in PBS, digested for 45 min at 37 °C in PBS with 4 mg/ml BSA (Sigma) containing 2.5 mg/ml collagenase (CLSII, ‘Worthington type’; Biochrom, Berlin, Germany) and 25 µg/ml DNAse (Sigma) and passed through a 250 µm sieve to remove mucous material and undigested tissue. Stromal cells were separated from epithelial cells by sequential sieving through 70 µm and 40 µm nylon sieves with stromal cells passing into the filtrate. The remaining EECs on top of the filter were backwashed with PBS and incubated for a further 30 min at 37 °C in PBS containing 4 mg/ml collagenase, 1 mg/ml hyaluronidase (Sigma), 0.17 mg/ml DNAse and 1 mg/ml proteinase K (Sigma) to further separate into single epithelial cells from the isolated glands. After centrifugation, cell pellets were washed once at 4 °C in culture medium consisting of Ham’s F-12 minimal essential medium (MEM) (Biochrom) substituted with 2 mM L-glutamine (Life Technologies, Karlsruhe, Germany), 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) (Biochrom), 160 ng/ml bovine insulin (Life Technologies) and 1 nM E2 (Sigma), including the antibiotics streptomycin (100 µg/ml), penicillin (100 µg/ml) and amphotericin B (0.5 µg/ml) (all Sigma). EECs were resuspended in the same medium at 37 °C and seeded into six-well dishes coated with collagen IV (Greiner, Solingen, Germany). From 2 days of culture onwards, EECs were cultured in medium devoid of antibiotics.

Prior to transfection, the EECs were passaged into fresh six-well culture dishes. On the second or third day following isolation of primary cells transfection was performed under serum-free conditions for 6 h at 60–80% cellular confluency employing the Lipofectamine PLUS transfection kit (Life Technologies) and 1, 5 and 10 µg of the eukaryotic expression plasmid pCIneo hTERT plasmid (generously provided by Prof. R Weinberg, Whitehead Institute, MA, USA). The transfection medium was replaced by normal culture medium overnight, and the day after transfection cells were passaged in fresh normal culture medium. Selection of stable transfectants started 48 h later on these highly proliferating cells with culture medium containing 600 µg/ml geneticin (Life Technologies). Starting from cell passage 18, stable hTERT transfectants of EECs (hTERT-EECs) were further characterized. Stable hTERT-EECs transfectants were cultured in normal E2-free medium. Non-transfected primary EECs or EECs transfected with the empty pCIneo plasmid died at passages four or five, approximately 18–26 days after isolation. Of the ten hTERT-EECs clones isolated we report here the characterization of clone, hTERT-EEC B37.

Telomerase repeat amplification protocol (TRAP)

Telomerase activity in primary EECs and in hTERT-EECs was determined with the TRAPeze telomerase detection kit (Intergen Company, Oxford, UK) according to kit instructions. Briefly, primary human EECs were used 5 days following isolation and hTERT-EECs were used at passage 45 corresponding to 250 population doublings. Cells (104) were lysed for 30 min at 4 °C in CHAPS lysis buffer provided with the kit, snap-frozen on dry ice and aliquots were stored at –80 °C until used.

E2 and P4 stimulation

For stimulation studies with E2 at 1 and 10 nM for 24–48 h, hTERT-EECs were grown in phenol red-free medium (Promocell, Heidelberg, Germany) supplemented with 10% charcoal-stripped FCS (steroid hormone depleted FCS; Biozol, Eching, Germany) for at least 3 days. hTERT-EECs were primed with 1 nM E2 prior to the incubation for 48 h with 50–500 ng/ml P4 or with 10–6 M of the stable derivative medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) (both Sigma).

Proliferation assays

Ki-67 cell proliferation assay
In order to have a complementary measure of active cell proliferation beyond the standard methods of thymidine or bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation, we developed an alternative to the ELISAs reported by Frahm et al.(1998, 1999). Ki-67 was selected as a marker because of evidence that its cellular expression has a direct relationship with function/type of cellular events or disease progression (Barzanti et al. 2000).

Europium (Eu) labeling
This assay is based on DELFIA technology (time-resolved fluorescence). An aliquot of 200 µg/ml of Ki-67 (sc-15402) rabbit polyclonal antibody (Autogen Bioclear UK Ltd, Calne, Wilts, UK) was desalted using a MicroSpin G-25 centrifugal column (Amersham Biosciences) in order to remove azide, which interferes with Eu labeling. The antibody (100 µl) was then combined with 10 µl labeling buffer (500 mM Na2CO3, pH 9.2). Sephadex G-25 (Amersham) was soaked in elution buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl containing 9 g NaCl/l and 0.5 g NaN3/l, pH 7.8) prior to being packed into a 30 x 1 cm plastic column and allowed to settle overnight. The Ki-67 was then labeled using an Eu labeling kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Perkin-Elmer UK Ltd, Beaconsfield, Bucks, UK). Briefly, 125 µl labeling buffer containing the Eu labeling reagent were added to 125 µl Ki-67 antibody in labeling buffer and incubated overnight at room temperature (RT). The G-25 column was equilibrated with 90 ml elution buffer, the Eu+Ki-67 antibody mixture was loaded and 60 fractions of 1 ml were collected. The fractions were diluted 1:10 000 in DELFIA enhancer solution (containing the following per liter: 1 ml Triton X-100, 1.4 g phthalic acid, 6 ml glacial acetic acid, 1 ml tri-n-octylphosphine oxide dissolved at 19 mg/ml ethanol and 0.5 ml 4,4,4-trifluoro-(2-naphthyl)-1,3-butanedione dissolved at 8 mg/ml ethanol, pH 3.2) and counted in a 96-well microtiter plate using a 1234 DELFIA fluorometer (Perkin-Elmer). Two peaks of Eu were detected, the first containing labeled Ki-67 antibody, the second containing free Eu. The 1 ml fractions comprising the first peak were combined and stabilizer (heavy metal-free BSA; Perkin-Elmer) was added (0.1% of final volume). The labeled anti-Ki-67 stock solution was then stored at 8 °C.

DELFIA Ki-67 assay
On the day of the assay the culture dishes to be assayed were decanted and tapped dry over filter paper. Two hundred microliters of Triton X-100 in 70% ethanol were added to each well and the dishes incubated for 30 min at RT to permeabilize cell membranes. Dishes were then decanted and 100 µl Eu-labeled anti-Ki-67 antibody (60 µl stock Eu-labeled Ki-67 in 9 ml culture media as detailed below) were added to each well. After 30 min shaking incubation at RT the plates were washed three times with a plate washer containing DELFIA wash buffer (1 ml Tween-20/l distilled water). Two hundred microliters of DELFIA enhancer were then added to each well and the dishes counted as above after 5 min shaking incubation.

MTT cell viability assay
On the day of the assay the culture dishes were decanted and 10 µl of 5 mg MTT (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide)/ml added to each well. The dishes were then incubated for a further 4 h at 37 °C in a water-saturated 95% CO2 incubator to allow development of formazan salt. The MTT was then removed and 100 µl DMSO (Sigma) were added to each well and left for 20 min until color developed. Absorbance was read at 690 nm using an Anthos HT111 plate reader (Labtech, Salzburg, Austria).

BrdU incorporation proliferation assay
A colorimetric BrdU cell proliferation ELISA (Roche Diagnostics) was used according to manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, on the day of assay 20 µl BrdU labeling solution were added to each well, except for negative controls which received no BrdU, and incubated for 2 h at 37 °C in a water-saturated 95% CO2 incubator. The culture dishes were inverted and tapped dry onto filter paper and 200 µl FixDenat added to each well and left for 20 min at RT. The dishes were then drained and blocked with 200 µl/well of ELISA blocking reagent (Roche) for 30 min at RT. After decanting, 100 µl anti-BrdU solution were added to each well and the dishes incubated for 30 min at RT. The dishes were drained again, washed and incubated with 100 µl/well of substrate solution for 10 min at RT. Finally 25 µl 1 M H2SO4 were added to each well and incubated for 1 min on a shaker at 300 r.p.m. The absorbance was measured at 450 nm within 5 min (Anthos HT111 plate reader; Labtech).

E2 induction of cell proliferation
In order to investigate the E2 induction of proliferation in hTERT-EECs, two experiments were carried out and repeated at least twice. In the first series of experiments, rows of wells were plated out with between 0 and 20 000 cells in 96-well culture dishes and incubated for 72 h in normal culture medium supplemented with 10% FCS. The medium was then replaced with either steroid-free culture medium or normal culture medium plus 1 nM E2 (Sigma) and incubated for a further 48 h. Cell viability and proliferation were then determined using the MTT, BrdU and Ki-67 assays. In the second series of experiments, rows of wells were plated out with between 0 and 20 000 cells in 96-well culture dishes and incubated for 72 h in normal culture medium supplemented with 10% FCS or culture medium supplemented with 10% charcoal-treated FCS to remove steroid hormones. Thereafter, medium was replaced with steroid-free culture medium or normal culture medium plus 1 nM E2 and incubated for a further 48 h. Cell viability and proliferation were then determined using the MTT, BrdU and Ki-67 assays.

Three-dimensional (3D) culture of hTERT-EECs on a fibroblast/collagen lattice

A dermal equivalent fibroblast/collagen matrix was employed as a 3D culture system for hTERT-EECs (Hoeller et al. 2001). Briefly, 8 vol of acidic collagen (3 mg/ml collagen I and III in 12 mM HCl; Biochrom) and 1 vol of 10-fold Dulbecco’s MEM (Dulbecco’s MEM (DMEM) with 4.5 g/l D-glucose; Biochrom) were neutralized with 1 M sodium hydroxide. One vol of human foreskin fibroblasts (1 x 105 cells/ml) in FCS was added and 4 ml of the mixture were poured immediately into polycarbonate membrane tissue culture inserts (2.5 cm diameter, 0.4 µm pore size; Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark). The inserts were placed into six-well culture plates (Falcon-Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and filled with 2 ml culture medium. After complete polymerization, dermal equivalents were covered by culture medium which was composed of DMEM/Ham’s F-12 (1/1) high glucose, low calcium with L-glutamine (PAA, Linz, Austria) with 10% FCS, 1.8 x 10–4 M adenine (hydrochloride), 10–10 M cholera toxin, 2 x 10–9 M 3,3',5-triiodo-L-thyronine (sodium salt) (all Sigma), 10 ng/ml human recombinant epidermal growth factor (EGF), 5 µg/ml human recombinant insulin (both Roche), 4 µg/ml hydrocortisone (Serva, Heidelberg, Germany) and 5 µg/ml transferrin (human HOLO, iron-saturated; Promocell). Two days after casting the dermal equivalents, hTERT-EECs at passage 40 grown to subconfluency were detached from the culture flask and seeded at 1 x 106 cells per well. Seven days later the inserts were lifted onto polypropylene stoppers, the medium inside the insert was changed to high calcium (1.2 mM) and cultures were then cultivated at the air–liquid interface for another 7 days. For transmission electron microscopy, 3D gels were immersed in 2.2% phosphate-buffered glutaraldehyde solution for 2 h, postfixed for another 2 h in phosphate-buffered OsO4, dehydrated in graded series of ethanol and embedded in Araldite. Ultrathin sections (0.1 µm) were examined with a Phillips EM 300 transmission electron microscope.

Atomic force microscopy (AFM)

Imaging of living hTERT-EEC surface structures and extracellular matrix (ECM) components was analyzed by AFM contact mode (Bischoff et al. 2003). hTERT-EECs at 1 x 103 cells were seeded onto 1 cm2 cover slips and cultured to 60–80% confluency. For AFM analysis, cells were thoroughly rinsed three times with PBS without Ca2+/Mg2+. Measurements were performed in constant force contact mode by cantilever probes with very low spring constants (about 0.06 N/m). The force was adjusted to the minimum possible, to approach the probe softly to the surface and avoid probe–sample interactions. Since drying-up processes strongly change the cell surfaces, the observations of the humid cells were performed for a maximum time period of 90 min. The influence of estrogen and P4 on the secretion of ECM produced by hTERT-EECs was investigated by culturing the cells in estrogen-depleted culture medium for 3 days prior to exposure to 10 nM E2 for 48 h. To determine the role of P4 on ECM production, E2-primed hTERT-EECs were exposed to 1 µM MPA for 24 h.

Immunohistochemistry

For immunocytochemistry, hTERT-EECs cells at 80% confluence were washed once in PBS, fixed in Bouin’s solution and embedded in paraffin. For cytokeratin staining, antigen retrieval was performed by incubation of the sections with proteinase K (30 µg/ml for 30 min at 37 °C) and endogenous alkaline phosphatase was inactivated with 20% acidic acid in distilled water for 30 s prior to saturation of non-specific protein binding sites with 10% normal goat serum for 1 h at RT. The mouse monoclonal antibodies to cytokeratin (clone MNF 116) and vimentin (clone V9) (both Dako, Hamburg, Germany) were diluted in PBS plus 0.1% Tween-20 (PBS-T) containing 10% goat normal serum at 1:250 or 1:500 respectively, and incubated at 4 °C overnight. Sections were washed in PBS-T and incubated with an alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-mouse Ig secondary antibody (Dianova, Hamburg, Germany) at 1:250 for 1 h at RT. Specific binding was visualized with the alkaline phosphatase substrate HistoMark Red (Kirkegaard Perry Laboratories, Gaithersburg, MD, USA). Prior to immunodetection of the proliferation marker Ki-67 (Mib-1, dilution 1:50; Dianova), deparaffinized 3 µm sections were microwaved for 20 min in 0.1 M citrate buffer at pH 6.2. Endogenous peroxidase activity was inhibited for 15 min using a 3% solution of H2O2 in methanol. After washing in PBS, sections were incubated with a 1:200 dilution of biotinylated goat anti-mouse secondary antibody (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) for 30 min at RT. Detection of bound antibody was accomplished using the avidin-biotin complex method (Elite.Kit; Vector) and incubation for 5 min with a 0.1% solution of 3,3'-diaminobenzidine (Sigma) as chromogen. The specificity of the immunostaining was checked by replacing the primary antibody with mouse non-immune serum.

Immunodetection of ER-alpha and PR in hTERT-EECs was performed employing a peroxidase detection reaction. Endogenous peroxidase was inactivated with 3% H2O2 in methanol for 15 min and non-specific protein binding was saturated for 1 h with 10% goat non-immune serum in PBS-T. The mouse monoclonal antibodies to human ER-alpha (clone D-12; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) and to human PR (clone PgR 636; Dako) were diluted in PBS-T at 1:100 and 1:50 respectively. A peroxidase conjugated goat anti-mouse Ig secondary antibody (Dianova) was employed at 1:200 in PBS-T for 1 h prior for visualization of specific binding sites with the peroxidase substrate 3,3'-diaminobenzidine (Pierce/Perbio, Bonn, Germany).

Immunofluorescent detection of the epithelial cell marker E-cadherin was performed on confluent hTERT-EECs grown on silanized glass slides. Cells were washed twice with PBS and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde. Slides were boiled in citrate buffer for 15 min for antigen retrieval and incubated for 1 h at RT with a mouse monoclonal antibody to E-cadherin (Dako) diluted 1:25 in PBS-T. After incubation with a fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled secondary antibody (Alexa Fluor; Molecular Probes, Leiden, The Netherlands) and counterstaining of the nuclei with propidium iodide (Sigma), sections were examined with a laser scanning microscope (TCS-SP; Leica, Wetzlar, Germany).

Western blot analysis

For the immunodetection of ER-alpha, hTERT-EECs were grown in estrogen-free culture conditions for 5 days reaching 80% confluence in 25 cm2 flasks and lysis was performed in a cell lysis buffer containing 2% SDS and 10% saccharose in 63 mM Tris for 30 min at 4 °C. The lysate was boiled for 5 min at 90 °C and centrifuged to pellet the cell debris. The amount of protein was determined using a protein assay kit (BioRad) and a spectrophotometer at 595 nm. The lysate was stored at –80 °C until used. Protein extracts (30 µg/lane) were run on a 12% SDS polyacrylamide gel and proteins were blotted onto a nitrocellulose membrane (Amersham). After saturation of non-specific protein binding sites with 5% milk in PBS-T for 2 h at RT, membranes were incubated in blocking solution at 4 °C overnight with a mouse monoclonal antibody to human ER-alpha (1:100) (Clone D-12; Santa Cruz). Following several washing steps, a peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse Ig secondary antibody (Dianova) was incubated for 1 h at RT at 1:20 000 in PBS-T. After washing, specific binding was visualized with an ECL detection reagent on ECL Hyperfilm (both Amersham).

RNA isolation, RT- and quantitative RT-PCR (Q-RT-PCR)

Total RNA was isolated with Trizol reagent (Life Technologies). The amount of mRNA isolated was determined by spectrophotometry at 260 and 280 nm (Sambrook et al. 1989). Primers and PCR conditions used for RT-PCR are listed in Table 1Go. The RT-PCR reactions were carried out in 50 µl solution containing 1 µl cDNA, 5 µl 10 x Advantage cDNA polymerase mix buffer, 100 µM dNTP, 10 pmol of each primer (Table 1Go) and 2.5 U Taq DNA-polymerase (Life Technologies). The PCR cycles consisted of an initial denaturation for 3 min at 95 °C, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C and annealing at 60 °C, both for 1 min each, and an elongation step for 2 min at 72 °C and a final extension cycle for 10 min at 72 °C.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1 Oligonucleotide primers employed in normal and quantitative RT-PCR analysis
 
For quantitation, 1 µl of the reverse transcriptase reaction mixture was added to 25 µl reaction mixture consisting of 1 x Advantage2 reaction buffer, 1.5 U Taq polymerase (Clontech, Heidelberg, Germany), 0.2 x SYBR Green (Biozym, Hess. Oldendorf, Germany), 200 µM each dNTP, and 0.5 µM of each primer listed (Table 1Go). A negative control without template was included. Assays were done in triplicates in a Rotor-Gene 2000 (LTF, Wasserburg, Germany). Initial denaturation at 95 °C for 300 s was followed by 40 cycles with denaturation at 95 °C for 15 s, annealing at 60 °C for 30 s, and elongation at 72 °C for 20 s. To verify the single PCR products melting curves were generated and amplicons were cloned and sequenced bidirectionally. The fluorescence intensity of the double-strand specific SYBR Green, reflecting the amount of formed PCR product, was read after each elongation step at 82 °C. Relative quantitation of gene expression was performed with the software Rotor-Gene version 4.6 (LTF, Wasserburg, Germany) in comparative quantitation mode. This mode allowed the comparison between differently treated samples relative to a control sample. The second derivative of the raw data was taken to calculate the take off point. Based on the take off point and the reaction efficiency, the relative concentration of each sample was calculated in comparison with the control sample. Standard deviations were determined by t-test.

Estrogen response element (ERE) reporter assay

Proliferative hTERT-EECs cultured under estrogen-free conditions for 5 days were transiently transfected with an ERE luciferase reporter plasmid (generously provided by Dr Silke Kietz, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden) employing the Lipofectamine Plus transfection kit (Life Technologies). Culture medium was changed 6 h after transfection, and after 24 h of transfection hTERT-EECs were incubated for another 24 h with 10 nM E2 or 1 µM diethylstilbestrol (DES) diluted in estrogen-free medium. Cells were washed once with PBS, lysed for 15 min at RT with cell culture lysis reagent (Promega, Heidelberg, Germany) and supernatants were stored at –80 °C until used. Luciferase activity was determined with the firefly luciferase substrate (Promega) in a Serius 2 luminometer (Berthold Detection Systems, Pforzheim, Germany). Estrogen-free cultured hTERT-EECs transfected with the luciferase reporter plasmid served as the negative control.

Flow cytometry analysis

Cells were detached from six-well plates using Accutase (PAA). Following two washes in 4 °C PBS, standard surface membrane immunofluorescence techniques were used. Cells were stained with either CD10 or CD13 monoclonal antibodies (both Becton Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany) or an IgG1 isotype control (Becton Dickinson) at 4 °C for 40 min. After two washings with 4 °C PBS containing 0.1% sodium azide, cells were labeled with the phycoerythrin-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody (Dianova) at 4 °C for 30 min, washed three times and fixed using 1% paraformaldehyde in PBS. Fluorescence was analyzed in a Becton Dickinson Calibur fluorescence activated cell sorter (FACS) using Cellquest software. Ten thousand cells per sample were counted. Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was calculated as sample MFI minus control antibody MFI.

Statistical analysis

The cell proliferation analyses were performed using the Statview 5 program (Abacus Concepts, Inc., Berkley, CA, USA). All results are presented as means ± S.E.M. Because the proliferation data were not normally distributed, the effects of treatments on proliferation and viability were determined using the non-parametric Mann–Whitney test. The relationship between Ki-67 and BrdU proliferation assays was analysed by simple linear correlation with significance established using Fischer’s z statistic. Results from the quantitative RT-PCR analyses were based on three independent cell culture experiments and PCR analysis for each of the cDNA samples was repeated at least twice. Results are presented as means ± S.E.M. P values of P<0.05 were considered as statistically significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Human primary EECs in the first and second passage following isolation were immortalized by lipid-mediated transfection with the catalytic subunit of the human telomerase complex (hTERT). Of the several epithelial cell clones derived after single cell cloning, we have been continuously culturing clone hTERT-EEC B37 for 69 passages or an estimated 370 population doublings in selection medium containing 600 µg/ml geneticin. By contrast, untransfected primary EECs underwent senescence after five or six passages. The TRAP assay revealed active telomerase in hTERT-EECs and weaker hTERT activity in primary EECs derived from the first passage after isolation (Fig. 1Go).



View larger version (126K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Telomerase activity was detected in human primary EECs of the first passage on day 3 of culture (lane 1) and hTERT-EEC B37 at passage 40 (lane 2). Heat-inactivated hTERT-EEC B37 (lane 3) and CHAPS lysis buffer only (lane 4) served as negative controls. Positive control template for active telomerase served as positive control (lane 5). Telomerase activity was determined by TRAP. As expected, early passage primary EECs still demonstrated some telomerase activity (lane 1). Despite their long-term culture (>2 years), stable hTERT-EECs transfectants revealed active hTERT (lane 2).

 
Starting at passage 20 onwards, hTERT-EECs were further characterized. The hTERT-EECs expressed the nuclear proliferation marker Ki-67 (Fig. 2AGo) and displayed typical epithelial cell morphology. Immunocytochemistry was positive for the epithelial cell marker cytokeratin (Fig. 2BGo) and cells were devoid of immunostaining for the stromal cell markers vimentin (Fig. 2CGo), CD10 and CD13 (Fig. 3Go), demonstrating the epithelial nature of hTERT-EECs. As shown by confocal laser scanning microscopy, confluent hTERT-EECs expressed membrane-anchored immunoreactive epithelial adhesion marker E-cadherin at lateral cell contacts (Fig. 2DGo) and revealed contact inhibition when grown to confluency on collagen-coated cell culture dishes. Employing specific primers (Table 1Go), RT-PCR analysis of untreated hTERT-EECs revealed transcripts for the integrin subunits alpha 3, alpha 6, beta 1, beta 3 and beta 4 (data not shown).



View larger version (132K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Localization of key cell markers in hTERT-EECs. Immunocytochemical staining of paraformaldehyde (PFA)-fixed, paraffin-embedded hTERT-EEC B37 cells with antibodies against the nuclear proliferation marker Ki-67 (A), the epithelial cell marker cytokeratin (B), the stromal cell marker vimentin (C), ER-alpha (E) and PR (F). Immunofluorescent labeling for the epithelial adhesion molecule E-cadherin (D) was performed on 4% PFA-fixed hTERT-EEC B37 cells grown to confluency on collagen-coated glass slides. Magnifications: (B) x200; (D) x600; all others x400. (G) Polarized hTERT-EEC B37 display a basal lamina (BL) and apical microvillous structures (arrows), as shown by transmission electron microscopy of hTERT-EEC B37 cells grown on a 3D collagen/fibroblast lattice for 2 weeks. Magnification: x90 000.

 


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 FACS analysis was performed on hTERT-EECs cells for the detection of the stromal markers CD10 and CD13 employing monoclonal antibodies to CD10 and CD13. No immunostaining was detected on the epithelial hTERT-EECs cells. A monoclonal isotype-control antibody was used as negative control.

 
When cultured to confluence on collagen IV-coated cell culture dishes, hTERT-EECs displayed contact inhibition, remained viable for 2 weeks with daily changes of culture medium and after renewed passaging continued to grow normally. The hTERT-EECs were non-invasive in a fibroblast/collagen lattice employed as a 3D culture system. Growing as a continuous epithelial lining, hTERT-EECs displayed a polarized phenotype, producing a basal lamina towards the collagen matrix and displaying apical microvillous surface structures as shown by transmission electron microscopy (Fig. 2GGo).

AFM revealed extensive deposition of ECM components deposited by neighboring hTERT-EEC cells (Fig. 4AGo). ECM production and composition were altered in the presence of E2 and P4. hTERT-EEC cells cultured in normal medium or in estrogen-free medium supplemented with 1 nM E2 produced large amounts of tubular-shaped ECM structures with diameters of 60–120 nm (Fig. 4B and DGo). The same cells cultured in estrogen-free medium and then co-stimulated with E2 (1 nM) plus MPA (10–6 M) produced an amorphous ECM layer which was sticky to the AFM cantilever. Tubular-shaped ECM structures observed under the influence of P4 had taken on a mucus-like appearance (Fig. 4CGo).



View larger version (198K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Images of living hTERT-EECs cell surface and intercellular ECM components observed by AFM. hTERT-EECs were grown in normal medium on coverslips, washed three times with PBS without Ca2+/Mg2+. The moist cells were studied at RT under near-native conditions in AFM contact mode (A). ECM produced by hTERT-EECs cultured with 1 nM E2 for 24 h revealed a tubular structure (B). E2-primed hTERT-EECs incubated with 100 ng/ml P4 for 24 h produced an ECM which interacted stickily during scanning with the scanning probe (C). (D) Higher magnification of secreted tubular-shaped ECM upon E2 treatment of hTERT-EECs.

 
hTERT-EECs expressed transcripts for ER-alpha, ER-beta and PR and displayed nuclear localization of immunoreactive ER-alpha and PR proteins (Fig. 2E and FGo). Both QT-RT-PCR and Western analysis revealed up-regulation of ER-alpha transcript (Fig. 5Go) and ER-alpha protein (Fig. 6Go), following culture of hTERT-EECs in estrogen-free medium for 3 days. Consecutive exposure to E2 (10–8-10–9 M) for 24 h caused a significant down-regulation of ER-alpha at the transcript (Fig. 5Go) and protein level (Fig. 6Go). Expression levels of ER-beta transcripts remained unaltered under these conditions (Fig. 5Go). Functionality of the induced endogenous ER-alpha was demonstrated by transient transfection assays with an ERE-luciferase reporter plasmid. Exposure to either 1 µM DES or 10 nM E2 initiated a strong induction of luciferase reporter activity (Fig. 7Go). Exposure to E2 strongly up-regulated transcriptal activity of the PR gene, a classic ER-alpha target gene in the endometrium (Figs 5Go and 8AGo). The E2-induced PR appeared to be functional as demonstrated by the significant down-regulation of PR-transcripts following exposure of the hTERT-EECs to P4 or the stable metabolite MPA (Fig. 8AGo).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 Steroids modulate steroid receptor gene expression in hTERT-EECs. Quantitative RT-PCR was performed on hTERT-EEC B37 cells precultured under estrogen-free conditions for 72 h. Thereafter, cells were treated without E2 or 10 nM E2. In addition, the hTERT-EECs were primed with 1 nM E2 for 24 h to induce PR production prior to treatment with 100 ng/ml P4. Hormonal treatment periods for E2 and P4 were 24 h (1d; d=day) and 48 h (2d). E2 resulted in a specific and lasting down-regulation of ER-alpha, but not ER-beta, which was unaffected by E2. E2 treatment caused an up-regulation of PR at both days of treatment. One hundred nanograms/ml of P4 did not influence ER-beta transcripts. 1d columns show a representative result from three independent experiments which was set at 1 (100%) and served as references to determine the relative means±S.E.M. (P<0.05) of the QPCR results derived from the stimulation assays.

 


View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6 Representative Western blot (n=3) demonstrating the specific up-regulation of ER-alpha protein (67 kDa) in hTERT-EEC B37 when cultured in estrogen-free medium (C). Cells cultured in normal medium plus 10% FCS (A) or in medium supplemented with 10 nM E2 (B) were devoid of immunoreactive ER-alpha indicating that E2 and traces of estrogens present in FCS are sufficient in suppressing ER-alpha expression in hTERT-EECs.

 


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7 hTERT-EECs express functional ER. Transient transfection assays employing an ERE-luciferase reporter plamid. Incubation of hTERT-EECs with 1 µM DES or 10 nM E2 resulted in a strong induction of luciferase activity demonstrating that the ER-alpha was functional in these cells. Data is represented as means±S.E.M. of three independent experiments.

 


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8 Quantitative RT-PCR analysis from three independent incubations demonstrated the responsiveness of hTERT-EECs towards the steroid hormones E2 and P4. Prior to incubation with P4 and the synthetic P4 analogue MPA, hTERT-EECs had been cultured estrogen-free for 3 days and were then primed with 10 nM E2 for 24 h to induce PR expression. Incubation without E2 for 4 days (1); E2-deprived cells were treated with 10 nM E2 for 24 h only (2), and subsequently 1 nM E2+various concentrations of P4: 50 ng/ml P4 (3), 100 ng/ml P4 (4), 500 ng/ml (5) or 1 µM MPA (6). (A) A differential regulation of PR gene expression by steroid hormones was demonstrated by the suppressive effect of P4 and MPA on PR gene activity in hTERT-EEC B37. A similar partial suppression of PR gene expression was observed for all concentrations of P4 employed, suggesting a saturable effect of P4 at 50 ng/ml or 1 µM MPA. (B) E2 has stimulatory effects on the IL-6 system of hTERT-EECs. A 4-fold up-regulation of IL-6 gene activity in hTERT-EECs resulted from E2 treatment. By contrast, a slight but significant transcriptional up-regulation of IL6-R was observed at higher concentrations of P4 and MPA, whereas E2 alone or in combination with 50 ng/ml P4 was unable to affect IL6-R expression. This would indicate that in hTERT-EECs both ovarian steroids were able to differentially affect the IL6 ligand–receptor system. (C) Treatment of estrogen-deprived, ER-alpha-induced hTERT-EECs with 10 nM E2 caused an up-regulation in MUC-1 transcriptional gene activity which was further enhanced in the presence of P4 and MPA. (D) P4 induced ER-beta gene activity at 500 ng/ml (4) or 1 µM MPA (5). The lower P4 concentrations used for the incubations shown in Fig. 5Go were not sufficient to induce ER-beta expression (see Fig. 5Go). Data is represented as means±S.E.M. of three independent experiments. *P≤0.05 significance compared to E2 free cultured cells.

 
The influence of E2 on viability and proliferation of hTERT-EECs was assessed with the MTT cell viability assay and both BrdU and Ki-67 proliferation assays. On average over the series of experiments the correlation between Ki-67 and BrdU proliferation assays was high (r=0.88–0.98, P<0.001) except that BrdU incorporation became asymptotic more quickly than Ki-67 expression at higher cell numbers. When the cells were not given at least 72 h of steroid-free incubation (Fig. 9a–cGo), there was no significant change in cell viability or proliferation following E2 treatment, except for a significant increase in BrdU incorporation at 20 000 cells/well (up to 16% increase, P<0.05). However, when the cells were given at least 72 h in the absence of steroids (Fig. 9d–fGo) both BrdU incorporation and Ki-67 expression were significantly increased by subsequent exposure to E2 (up to 53 and 18% respectively, P<0.001). These results are easily explained by the up-regulation of ER-alpha expression under estrogen-deprived culture conditions (Figs 5Go and 6Go). Cell viability was not influenced by estrogen irrespective of the medium used (Fig. 9bGo). P4 treatment for 48 h with 500 nM P4 or 1 µM MPA on estrogen-primed PR-positive hTERT-EECs did not stimulate proliferation in either assay (data not shown).



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 9 E2 effects on hTERT-EECs viability and proliferation. Cell viability (MTT, a, d) and cellular proliferation as determined by BrdU ELISA (b, e) and Ki-67 assay (c, f) are shown. Representative graphs in (a–c) show the effects of the addition of 10 nM E2 ({circ}) or medium only containing 10% FCS (•) on cells following 72 h of incubation in steroid-supplemented medium. Graphs (d–f) show the effects of 10 nM E2 on cells following 72 h incubation in either steroid-free medium ({circ}) or steroid-supplemented medium (•). Pre-treatment of hTERT-EECs for 72 h with steroid-free medium was required to stimulate cell proliferation with 10 nM E2 treatment for 48 h (e, f). This proliferative effect was abolished when hTERT-EECs had been incubated in the presence of estrogens derived either from FCS which had not been estrogen-freed or from E2 added to the culture medium. Results of single experiments are shown, with values expressed as means±S.E.M. with significance denoted by stars (*P<0.05) and (**P<0.001) as determined by the Mann–Whitney test.

 
In an attempt to determine the suitability of our hTERT-EECs as an in vitro model to study endometrial epithelial cell physiology, we analyzed the expression of the interleukin (IL)-6, IL-6 receptor (IL6-R), leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), LIF receptor (LIF-R) and gp130 isoforms which are known to be important mediators of endometrial function during implantation (for specific primers see Table 1Go; primers for gp130 according to Sherwin et al. 2002). Both IL-6 and IL6-R were expressed by hTERT-EECs. Up-regulation of IL-6 transcripts was detected by Q-RT-PCR in hTERT-EECs upon exposure to estrogen (Fig. 8BGo) with P4 or MPA having no further effect. Estrogens only moderately affected IL-6R expression in hTERT-EECs. However, exposure of the cells to P4 or MPA caused an up-regulation of IL6-R (Fig. 8BGo). Employing specific PCR primers reported by Sherwin et al., RT-PCR for the four known gp130 isoforms revealed the exclusive presence of the full-size gp130 transcript in hTERT-EECs. Transcriptional activity for LIF and LIF-R was weak and, like gp130, remained unaffected by ovarian steroid hormones (data not shown). The highly glycosylated membrane-anchored mucin MUC-1 has been implicated in endometrial receptivity. MUC-1 gene activity was up-regulated in hTERT-EECs upon treatment with E2 and this transcriptional activation was further enhanced in the presence of P4 (Fig. 8CGo; Table 1Go). Induction of ER-beta gene activity in hTERT-EECs was dependent on the presence of a functional PR and higher concentrations of P4 or MPA (Fig. 8DGo).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Here we present a novel, hormonally responsive telomerase-immortalized human endometrial epithelial cell line (hTERT-EEC) which has conserved the ability of a fine-tuned regulation of steroid hormone receptors. These hTERT-EECs derived from primary endometrial glandular epithelial cells of the proliferative phase have been cultured for over 350 population doublings (65 passages) and displayed a stable epithelial phenotype. Kyo et al.(2003) have recently described the immortalization of human EECs from a late proliferative phase of the cycle by viral transfection with HPV E6 and E7 additional to hTERT to overcome Rb/p16 mediated telomerase-independent early senescence described in certain epithelial cells. In contrast to the method used by Kyo et al.(2003), our primary EECs derived from an early stage of the menstrual cycle (day 7) and cells had been liberated from the isolated endometrial glands by an additional enzymatic treatment. This may have resulted in a higher percentage of individual EECs with stem cell-like characteristics to be transfected. As demonstrated for primary mammary epithelial cells and conjunctival keratinocytes, a sub-population of isolated epithelial cells lacks p16 expression, escapes senescence stage M0 and can be immortalized by introducing hTERT only (Foster et al. 1998, Kiyono et al. 1998, Rheinwald et al. 2002).

hTERT-EECs revealed cellular contact inhibition when cultured at confluency as a monolayer on collagen-coated culture dishes for more than 2 weeks and, when re-seeded, remained viable, metabolically active and proliferative cells. By contrast, established human endometrial carcinoma cell lines frequently employed in studies on EEC physiology have lost normal epithelial anchorage-dependent growth control (Isaka et al. 2003). Cellular polarization is a critical parameter affecting numerous cell functions (Yeaman et al. 1999) and has been shown in primary EECs to be important for embryo attachment and implantation (Meseguer et al. 2001) and to enhance protein secretion (Negami & Tominaga 1989). hTERT-EECs cultured in a 3D collagen/fibroblast matrix displayed a polarized, non-invasive phenotype as illustrated by the production of a basal lamina and the formation of microvilli at the apical cell membrane. Thus, when cultured under appropriate culture conditions, the hTERT-EECs have conserved a phenotype resembling native human EECs in vivo. Primary human EECs were reported to retain their polarization for a limited time period only (Classen-Linke et al. 1997, Negami & Tominaga 1989) and, when grown on ECM material from an Engelbreth-Holm-Swarm tumor (MatrigelR), showed increased protein secretion (Negami & Tominaga 1989). This Matrigel, however, is supplemented with several growth factors including transforming growth factor-ß, EGF, insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I, basic fibroblast growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor, and these growth factors and/or the tumor matrix itself may perturb physiological EEC responses. Similarly, the addition of growth factor supplements derived from crude protein extracts of bovine brain to the culture medium of human primary EECs would be regarded as a drawback (Zhang et al. 1995). By contrast, hTERT-EECs have been continuously cultured independently of the presence of numerous growth factors.

AFM showed that live hTERT-EECs deposited long tubular-shaped ECM structures, ranging in diameter from 60 to 120 nm. Similar to a previous report on reticulin fiber production in human menstrual cells cultured on collagen gels (Kamelle et al. 2002), the production of ECM by hTERT-EECs was influenced by the ovarian steroid hormones. Estrogen treatment of the ER-alpha-positive hTERT-EECs resulted in an increased secretion of tubular-shaped ECM structures. In the presence of P4, production of these ECM structures was greatly reduced and replaced by a mucus-like secretion, which proved sticky as determined by AFM contact scanning mode. These findings in hTERT-EECs may reflect a physiological secretory response of normal endometrial glandular epithelium to P4.

Responsiveness to estrogen and P4 is an important characteristic of the EEC. The human endometrial carcinoma cell lines Ishikawa, RL-95, ECC-1, KLE, HEC-1A and EN revealed altered or impaired hormonal responsiveness (Thie et al. 1995, Jazaeri et al. 2001, Dardes et al. 2002, Di Nezza et al. 2003, Farnell & Ing 2003, Isaka et al. 2003). In hTERT-EECs, the level of expression of ER-alpha, but not ER-beta, was regulated by estrogen, demonstrating different regulatory processes to affect the transcriptional activation of the two human ER isoforms in hTERT-EECs. Cultured under estrogen-free conditions, hTERT-EECs responded with a marked induction of ER-alpha gene activity that was reflected in increased production of ER-alpha protein. By contrast, estrogens in the culture medium proved to be strong repressors of ER-alpha production by hTERT-EECs. Down-regulation of ER-alpha following estrogen treatment has recently been shown in endometrial glands of ovariectomized macaques (Wang et al. 2002), in endometrial epithelial and stromal cells of immature ewes (Meikle et al. 2000) and in the human endometrial carcinoma cell line ECC-1 (Dardes et al. 2002). hTERT-EECs produced a functional ER-alpha that was clearly responsive to estrogen or the synthetic estrogenic compound DES, as demonstrated by a strong induction of luciferase using a ERE-luciferase reporter plasmid. In agreement with observations in primary human EECs (Zhang et al. 1995, Classen-Linke et al. 1997) and Ishikawa cells (Lessey et al. 1996), E2 induced PR expression in hTERT-EECs, which is a classic endometrial ER target gene (Milgrom et al. 1973, Classen-Linke et al. 1997, Brandenberger et al. 1999, Saegusa & Okayasu 2000, Borthwick et al. 2003). The dose-dependent decrease of PR transcriptional gene activity in the presence of P4 indicated a functional PR signaling pathway in hTERT-EECs as had been described for primary EECs (Classen-Linke et al. 2000, Spencer & Bazer 2002). We employed MUC-1 gene expression to provide further evidence for P4-induced physiological responses by this cellular endometrial model system. Expression and secretion of the highly glycosylated membrane anchored protein MUC-1 from glandular and luminal EECs is increased during the secretory phase of the cycle and MUC-1 is believed to act as an anti-adhesive factor of the receptive endometrium (Aplin et al. 1996, Meseguer et al. 2001). MUC-1 is down-regulated locally by the blastocyst at the site of embryonic attachment (Meseguer et al. 2001). P4 caused increased MUC-1 gene activity in estrogen-primed PR-positive hTERT-EECs, suggesting these cells to be a suitable model for studies on P4 signaling in human EECs. Altered P4 signaling resulting in reduced epithelial secretory functions has been linked to clinical problems such as recurrent miscarriage (Aplin et al. 1996). In hTERT-EECs, P4, but not E2, affected the balance between ER-alpha and ER-beta expression by up-regulating ER-beta mRNA. Within the human glandular epithelium increased ER-beta gene activity has been described during the late secretory phase of the cycle (Critchley et al. 2002). An altered relationship of ER-alpha to ER-beta expression has been detected in endometriotic stromal cells (Brandenberger et al. 1999) and was linked to endometrial carcinoma (Fujimoto et al. 2000, Saegusa & Okayasu 2000, Jazaeri et al. 2001). ER-beta appears to be important for the regulation and control of estrogen-mediated effects within the human endometrium. Thus, hTERT-EECs may qualify as a suitable cellular model to investigate factors disturbing this fine-tuned balance and regulation of the different steroid hormone receptors potentially leading to endometrial disease.

There are conflicting results on the expression of ER-alpha within human EECs (Marshburn et al. 1992, Zhang et al. 1995, Dardes et al. 2002). The hTERT-EECs showed a down-regulation at the gene and protein level of ER-alpha by its ligand E2. This would explain the lack of proliferative response of the hTERT-EECs during long-term incubation with E2. By contrast, estrogen-free culture conditions caused the hTERT-EECs to induce expression of a functional endogenous ER-alpha allowing for proliferation to resume upon exposure to E2. These results clearly demonstrated that the ER-alpha is an essential component of the estrogen-mediated growth-promoting effect in hTERT-EECs and may help to explain contradictory reports on the effect of E2 on EEC proliferation. In human primary EECs cultured under estrogen-free culture conditions prior to E2 treatment, E2 had a similar growth-promoting effect (Zhang et al. 1995). By contrast, Marshburn et al.(1992) did not observe any proliferative response to E2 in primary EECs grown on ECM. However, in this study exposure of the cells to E2 had not been preceded by estrogen-free culture conditions, thus suggesting that these EECs did not express sufficient amounts of ER-alpha for E2 to be effective. An estrogen-induced, but IGF-I-mediated, paracrine effect on the proliferation of isolated human EECs was discovered in a co-culture system with endometrial stromal cells (Pierro et al. 2001). This indirect estrogen-induced proliferative effect on EECs may, in part, be explained by our observation that, regardless of the culture conditions used, isolated primary human endometrial stromal cells constitutively express ER-alpha.

Members of the IL-6 family of cytokines are known key regulators of implantation in the endometrium (Sherwin et al. 2002). IL-6 expression in human EECs is regulated by hypoxia, IL-1 and steroid hormones and its expression is highest during the mid-secretory phase suggesting a role in embryo implantation (Sherwin et al. 2002, von Wolff et al. 2002). Increased IL-6 secretion by EECs has been reported in women suffering from endometriosis (Piva et al. 2001), recurrent abortion and unexplained infertility (Tseng et al. 1996, von Wolff et al. 2000). The human glandular endometrial epithelium expresses IL6-R, LIF-R and gp130, a heterodimerization partner and signal transducer protein for both cytokine receptors (Cork et al. 2002, Sherwin et al. 2002). Therefore, we investigated whether the hTERT-EECs may serve as a suitable cellular model for studies on the physiological role of human EECs during implantation. hTERT-EECs expressed transcripts for IL-6R, LIF-R, gp130 and the corresponding cytokine ligands IL-6 and LIF-R. IL-6 and IL6-R gene activity was significantly up-regulated by estrogen and P4 respectively, suggesting the presence of a hormonally controlled and potentially functional cytokine-receptor system within the immortalized human endometrial epithelial cell model.

In conclusion, hTERT-EECs may be a suitable novel human endometrial cellular model linking studies on the molecular and endocrine role of EECs with relevant clinical pathologies, such as endometriosis, implantation and its failures and endometrial carcinogenesis.


    Acknowledgements
 
We thank Mrs Pamela Cunningham, Margaret Fraser and Christine Froehlich for their expert technical assistance. We are grateful to Dr Heather Wallace (Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Aberdeen, UK) for advice on proliferation assays and assistance with the BrdU and MTT assays. We thank Prof. Rez Parwaresch (Institute of Hemopathology and Lymph Node Registry, Christian Albrechts University, Kiel, Germany) for assistance with gifts of antibodies and protocols during the development of the DELFIA Ki-67 proliferation assay. We thank Dr Sonja Kertschanska (Department of Anatomy, RWTH Aachen, Germany) and Mrs Yvonne Marquardt (Department of Dermatology, RWTH Aachen, Germany) for their expertise in TEM and collagen/fibroblast matrices. We are grateful to Dr Silke Kietz (Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden) and Prof. Robert A Weinberg (Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA, USA) for providing the ERE-luciferase reporter plasmid and pCIneo hTERT expression plasmid respectively. We are grateful to Dr Robert Augustin (Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, MLU Halle, Germany) for his assistance during confocal laser scanning microscopy and thank Mr Robert Bischoff (Sensobi Sensoren GmbH, Halle/Saale, Germany) for generously providing access to the Atomic Force Microscope. This work was partially funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG HO2319/3–1; KL1249/5–1/2) and the Wilhelm-Roux-Program (FKZ 2/11, 4/32) of the Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University, Halle-Wittenberg. The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that would prejudice the impartiality of this scientific work.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Aplin J, Hey N & Li T 1996 MUC1 as a cell surface and secretory component of endometrial epithelium: reduced levels in recurrent miscarriage. American Journal of Reproduction and Immunology 35 261–266.

Arnold J, Kaufman D, Seppälä M & Lessey B 2001 Endometrial stromal cells regulate epithelial cell growth in vitro: a new co-culture model. Human Reproduction 16 836–845.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Barzanti F, Dal Susino M, Volpi A, Amadori D, Riccobon A, Scarpi E, Medri L, Bernardi L, Naldi S, Aldi M et al. 2000 Comparison between different cell kinetic variables in human breast cancer. Cell Proliferation 33 75–89.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Bischoff G, Bernstein A, Wohlrab D & Hein H-J 2003 Imaging living chondrocyte surface structures with AFM contact mode. In Atomic Force Microscopy – Biomedical Methods and Applications. Series: Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 242, pp 105–124. Eds PC Braga & D Ricci. Humana Press.

Bodnar A, Quellette M, Frolkis M, Holt S, Chiu C, Morin G, Harley C, Shay J, Lichtsteiner S & Wright W 1998 Extension of life-span by introduction of telomerase into normal human cells. Science 279 349–352.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Borthwick J, Charnock-Jones D, Tom B, Hull M, Teirney R, Phillips S & Smith S 2003 Determination of the transcript profile of the human endometrium. Molecular Human Reproduction 9 19–33.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Brandenberger A, Lebovic D, Tee M, Ryan I, Tseng J, Jaffe R & Taylor R 1999 Estrogen receptor (ER)-alpha and ER-beta isoforms in normal endometrial and endometriosis-derived stromal cells. Molecular Human Reproduction 5 651–655.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Carney S, Tahara H, Swartz C, Risinger J, He H, Moore A, Haseman J, Barrett J & Dixon D 2002 Immortalization of human uterine leiomyoma and myometrial cell lines after induction of telomerase activity: molecular and phenotypic characteristics. Laboratory Investigation 82 719–727.[Web of Science][Medline]

Classen-Linke I, Krusche M, Knauthe R & Beier H 1997 Establishment of a human endometrial cell culture system and characterization of its polarized hormone responsive epithelial cells. Cell and Tissue Research 287 171–185.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Classen-Linke I, Alfer J, Krusche C, Chwalisz K, Rath W & Beier H 2000 Progestins, progesterone receptor modulators, and progesterone antagonists change VEGF release of endometrial cells in culture. Steroids 65 763–771.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Cork B, Tuckerman E, Li T & Laird S 2002 Expression of interleukin (IL)-11 receptor by the human endometrium in vivo and effects of IL-11, IL-6 and LIF on the production of MMP and cytokines by human endometrial calls in vitro. Molecular Human Reproduction 8 841–848.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Counter C, Meyerson M, Eaton E, Ellisen L, Caddle S, Haber D & Weinberg R 1998 Telomerase activity is restored in human cells by ectopic expression of hTERT (hEST2), the catalytic subunit of telomerase. Oncogene 16 1217–1222.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Critchley HOD, Henderson TA, Kelly RW, Scobie GS, Evan LR, Groome NP & Saunders PTK 2002 Wild-type estrogen receptor (ERß1) and the splice variant (ERßcx/ß2) are both expressed within the human endometrium throughout the normal menstrual cycle. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 87 5265–5273.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Dardes R, Schafer J, Pearce S, Osipo C, Chen B & Jordan V 2002 Regulation of estrogen target genes and growth by selective estrogen receptor modulators in endometrial cancer cells. Gynecologic Oncology 85 498–506.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Di Nezza L, Jobling T & Salamonsen L 2003 Progestin suppresses matrix metalloproteinase production in endometrial cancer. Gynecologic Oncology 89 325–333.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Farnell Y & Ing N 2003 The effects of estradiol and selective estrogen receptor modulators on gene expression and messenger RNA stability in immortalized sheep endometrial stromal cells and human endometrial adenocarcinoma cells. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 84 453–461.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Foster SA, Wong DJ, Barrett MT & Galloway DA 1998 Inactivation of p16 in human mammary epithelial cells by CpG island methylation. Molecular and Cellular Biology 18 1793–1801.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Frahm S, Zott B, Dworeck C, Steinmann J, Neppert J & Parwaresch R 1998 Improved ELISA proliferation assay (EPA) for the detection of in vitro cell proliferation by a new Ki-67-antigen directed monoclonal antibody (Ki-S3). Journal of Immunological Methods 211 43–50.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Frahm S, Rudolph P, Dworeck C, Zott B, Heidebrecht H, Steinmann J & Neppert J 1999 Immunoenzymatic detection of the new proliferation associated protein p100 by means of a cellular ELISA: specific detection of cells in cell cycle phases S, G2 and M. Journal of Immunological Methods 223 147–153.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Fujimoto J, Sakaguchi H, Aoki I, Khatun S, Toyoki H & Tamaya T 2000 Steroid receptors and metastatic potential in endometrial cancers. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 75 209–212.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Grümmer R, Schwarzer F, Bainczyk K, Hess-Stumpp H, Redigor P, Schindler A & Winterhager E 2001 Peritoneal endometriosis: validation of an in-vivo model. Human Reproduction 16 1736–1743.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hoeller D, Huppertz B, Roos T, Gutierrez P, Merk H & Jugert F 2001 An improved and rapid method to construct skin equivalents from human hair follicles and fibroblasts. Experimental Dermatology 10 264–271.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Isaka K, Nishi H, Sagawa Y, Nakada T, Osakabe Y, Serizawa H, Ebihara Y & Takayama M 2003 Establishment of a new human cell line (EN) with TP53 mutation derived from endometrial carcinoma. Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics 141 20–25.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Jazaeri A, Nunes K, Dalton M, Xu M, Shupnik M & Rice L 2001 Well-differentiated endometrial adenocarcinomas and poorly differentiated mixed mullerian tumors have altered ER and PR isoform expression. Oncogene 20 6965–6969.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Jiang X-R, Jimenez G, Chang E, Frolkis M, Kusler B, Sage M, Beeche M, Bodnar A, Wahl G, Tisty T et al. 1999 Telomerase expression in human somatic cells dues not induce changes associated with an immortalized phenotype. Nature Genetics 21 111–114.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Kamelle S, Sienko A & Benbrook D 2002 Retinoids and steroids regulate menstrual phase histological features in human endometrial organotypic cultures. Fertility and Sterility 78 596–602.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Kitawaki J, Kado N, Ishihara H, Koshiba H, Kitaoka Y & Honjo H 2002 Endometriosis: the pathophysiology as an estrogen-dependent disease. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 83 149–155.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Kiyono T, Foster SA, Koop JI, McDougall JK, Galloway DA & Klingelhutz AJ 1998 Both Rb/p16INK4a inactivation and telomerase activity are required to immortalize human epithelial cells. Nature 396 84–88.[CrossRef][Medline]

Koopman E, Blok L, Brinkmann A, Helmerhorst T & Huikeshoven F 1999 Differential gene expression in progesterone-sensitive and progesterone-insensitive endometrial carcinoma cells. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 82 135–138.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Kyo S, Takakura M, Kohama T & Inoue M 1997 Telomerase activity in human endometrium. Cancer Research 57 610–614.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kyo S, Nakamura M, Kiyono T, Maida Y, Kanaya T, Tanaka M, Yatabe N & Inoue M 2003 Successful immortalization of endometrial glandular cells with normal structural and functional characteristics. American Journal of Pathology 163 2259–2269.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lessey B, Ilesanmi A, Castelbaum A, Yuan L, Somkuti S, Chwalisz K & Satyaswaroop P 1996 Characterization of the functional progesterone receptor in an endometrial adenocarcinoma cell line (Ishikawa): progesterone-induced expression of the alpha1 integrin. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 59 31–39.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Marshburn P, Head J, McDonald P & Casey M 1992 Culture characteristics of human endometrial glandular epithelium throughout the menstrual cycle: modulation of deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis by 17 beta-estradiol and medroxyprogesterone acetate. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 167 1888–1898.[Web of Science][Medline]

Meikle A, Bielli A, Masironi B, Pedrana G, Wang H, Forsberg M & Sahlin L 2000 An immunohistochemical study on the regulation of estrogen receptor alpha by estradiol in the endometrium of the immature ewe. Reproductive and Nutritional Development 40 587–596.

Meseguer M, Aplin J, Caballero-Campo P, O’Connor J, Martin J, Remohi J, Pellicer A & Simon C 2001 Human endometrial mucin MUC1 is up-regulated by progesterone and down-regulated in vitro by the human blastocyst. Biology of Reproduction 64 590–601.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Milgrom E, Luu T, Atger M & Baulieu E 1973 Mechanisms regulating the concentration and the conformation of progesterone receptor(s) in the uterus. Journal of Biological Chemistry 248 6366–6474.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mulholland J, Winterhager E & Beier H 1988 Changes in proteins synthesized by rabbit endometrial epithelial cells following primary culture. Cell and Tissue Research 252 123–132.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Negami A & Tominaga T 1989 Gland and epithelium formation in vitro from epithelial cells of the human endometrium. Human Reproduction 4 620–624.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pierro E, Minici F, Alesiani O, Miceli F, Proto C, Screpanti I, Mancuso S & Lanzone A 2001 Stromal–epithelial interactions modulate estrogen responsiveness in normal human endometrium. Biology of Reproduction 64 831–838.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Piva M, Horowitz G & Sharpe-Timms K 2001 Interleukin-6 differentially stimulates haptoglobin production by peritoneal and endometriotic cells in vitro: a model for endometrial–peritoneal interaction in endometriosis. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 86 2553–2561.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rheinwald JG, Hahn WC, Ramsey MR, Wu JY, Guo Z, Tsao H, De Luca M, Catricalà C & O’Toole KM 2002 A two-stage, p16INK4A- and p53-dependent keratinocyte senescence mechanism that limits replicative potential independent of telomere status. Molecular and Cellular Biology 22 5157–5172.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Saegusa M & Okayasu I 2000 Changes in expression of estrogen receptors alpha and beta in relation to progesterone receptor and pS2 status in normal and malignant endometrium. Japanese Journal of Cancer Research 91 510–518.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Sambrook J, Fritsch E & Maniatis T 1989 Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual, edn 2 Appendix E5. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.

Satyaswaroop P, Bressler R, de la Pena M & Gurpide E 1979 Isolation and culture of human endometrial glands. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 48 639–641.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schatz F, Gordon R & Laufer N 1990 Culture of human endometrial cells under polarizing conditions. Differentiation 42 184–190.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Sherwin J, Smith S, Wilson A & Sharkey A 2002 Soluble gp 130 is upregulated in the implantation window and shows altered secretion in patients with primary unexplained infertility. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 87 3953–3960.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Spencer T & Bazer F 2002 Biology of progesterone action during pregnancy recognition and maintenance of pregnancy. Frontiers in Bioscience 7 1879–1898.[CrossRef]

Tanaka M, Kyo S, Takakura M, Kanaya T, Sagawa T, Yamashita K, Okada Y, Hiyama E & Inoue M 1998 Expression of telomerase activity in human endometrium is localized to epithelial glandular cells and regulated in a menstrual phase dependent manner correlated with cell proliferation. American Journal of Pathology 153 1985–1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Thie M, Harrach-Ruprecht B, Sauer H, Fuchs P, Albers A & Denker H 1995 Cell adhesion to the apical pole of epithelium: a function of cell polarity. European Journal of Cell Biology 66 180–191.[Web of Science][Medline]

Tseng J, Ryan I & Milam T 1996 Interleukin-6 secretion in vitro is up-regulated in ectopic and eutopic endometrial stromal cells from women with endometriosis. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 81 1118–1122.[Abstract]

Utsunomiya H, Suzuki T, Ito K, Moriya T, Konno R, Sato S, Yaegashi N, Okamura K & Sasano H 2003 The correlation between the response to progesterone treatment and the expression of progesterone receptor B and 17 beta-hydroxysteroid-dehydrogenase type 2 in human endometrial carcinoma. Clinical Endocrinology 58 696–703.[CrossRef][Medline]

Varma V, Melin S, Adamec T, Dorman B, Siegfried J, Walton L, Carney C & Norton C 1982 Monolayer culture of human endometrium: methods of culture and identification of cell types. In Vitro 18 911–918.[Web of Science][Medline]

von Wolff M, Thaler C, Strowitzki T, Broome J, Stolz W & Tabibzadeh S 2000 Regulated expression of cytokines in human endometrium throughout the menstrual cycle: dysregulation in habitual abortion. Molecular Human Reproduction 6 627–634.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

von Wolff M, Stieger S, Lumpp K, Bücking J, Strowitzki T & Thaler C 2002 Endometrial interleukin-6 in vitro is not regulated directly by female steroid hormones, but by pro-inflammatory cytokines and hypoxia. Molecular Human Reproduction 8 1096–1102.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wang H, Isaksson E, von Schoultz B, Cline J & Sahlin L 2002 The effect of long-term treatment with steroid hormones or tamoxifen on estrogen receptors (alpha ad beta) in the endometrium of ovarectomized cynomolgus macaques. Journal of Endocrinology 175 673–681.[Abstract]

White T, di SantAgnese P & Miller R 1990 Human endometrial cells grown on an extracellular matrix form simple columnar epithelia and glands. In Vitro Cell Development and Biology 26 636–642.[CrossRef]

Yeaman C, Grindstaff K & Nelson W 1999 New perspectives on mechanisms involved in generating epithelial cell polarity. Physiological Reviews 79 73–98.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yokoyama Y, Takahashi Y, Shinohara A, Lian Z, Xiaoyun W, Niwa K & Tamaya T 1998 Telomerase activity is found in the epithelial cells but not in the stromal cells in human endometrial cell culture. Molecular Human Reproduction 4 985–989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zhang L, Rees M & Bicknell R 1995 The isolation and long-term culture of normal human endometrial epithelium and stroma. Journal of Cell Science 108 323–331.[Abstract]

Received 9 December 2004
Accepted 10 December 2004
Made available online as an Accepted Preprint 16 December 2004




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
A. E. King, A. W. Horne, S. Hombach-Klonisch, J. I. Mason, and H. O.D. Critchley
Differential expression and regulation of nuclear oligomerization domain proteins NOD1 and NOD2 in human endometrium: a potential role in innate immune protection and menstruation
Mol. Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2009; 15(5): 311 - 319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
A.W. Horne, W.C. Duncan, A.E. King, S. Burgess, P.C. Lourenco, P. Cornes, P. Ghazal, A.R. Williams, L. Udby, and H.O.D. Critchley
Endometrial cysteine-rich secretory protein 3 is inhibited by human chorionic gonadotrophin, and is increased in the decidua of tubal ectopic pregnancy
Mol. Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2009; 15(5): 287 - 294.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
K. Wanggren, P.G. Lalitkumar, F. Hambiliki, B. Stabi, K. Gemzell-Danielsson, and A. Stavreus-Evers
Leukaemia inhibitory factor receptor and gp130 in the human Fallopian tube and endometrium before and after mifepristone treatment and in the human preimplantation embryo
Mol. Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2007; 13(6): 391 - 397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
H. Achache and A. Revel
Endometrial receptivity markers, the journey to successful embryo implantation
Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2006; 12(6): 731 - 746.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
S. Hombach-Klonisch, P. Pocar, J. Kauffold, and T. Klonisch
Dioxin Exerts Anti-estrogenic Actions in a Novel Dioxin-Responsive Telomerase-Immortalized Epithelial Cell Line of the Porcine Oviduct (TERT-OPEC)
Toxicol. Sci., April 1, 2006; 90(2): 519 - 528.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hombach-Klonisch, S
Right arrow Articles by Klonisch, T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hombach-Klonisch, S
Right arrow Articles by Klonisch, T


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS