| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements, UMR 6175 INRA-CNRS-Université de Tours, Haras Nationaux, 37380 Nouzilly, France
1 Biologie du Développement et de la Reproduction, UMR 1198 INRA-ENVA, 78350 Jouy en Josas, France
(Requests for offprints should be addressed to S Fabre; Email: sfabre{at}tours.inra.fr)
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMaterials and methodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and methodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
In vitro, recombinant BMP-4, BMP-6, BMP-7, BMP-15 and GDF-9 are able to strongly inhibit FSH-induced progesterone secretion by rat GCs in culture (Shimasaki et al. 1999, Otsuka et al. 2000, 2001a,, Otsuka et al. b, Vitt et al. 2000, Lee et al. 2001, Souza et al. 2001). In contrast, BMP-4 and BMP-7 enhance FSH-dependent estradiol production, suggesting that BMP factors regulate GC differentiation, particularly in delaying the luteinization process (Shimasaki et al. 1999).
Several studies in the rat and the ewe using in situ hybridization or immunohistochemistry have detected the expression of several elements of the BMP signalling pathway in the ovary. For example, BMP-4 and BMP-7 are expressed by theca cells (Shimasaki et al. 1999), whereas BMP-6, GDF-9 and BMP-15 are oocyte-derived factors (for review, Elvin et al. 2000). BMP type I receptors, BMPRIA/Alk3 and BMPR1B/Alk6 and type II receptor BMPRII are expressed in GCs and oocytes (Shimasaki et al. 1999, Wilson et al. 2001, Souza et al. 2002). Transducing molecules of the Smad family have been detected in all compartments of follicles in the rat ovary (Drummond et al. 2002, Xu et al. 2002). Altogether, these observations indicate the presence of a complete BMP signalling pathway in ovaries, enabling autocrine and paracrine regulation.
Less is known about the mode of action of BMP family members on target cells in the ovary, particularly in GCs. In the rat, most actions of the BMP molecules on GC steroidogenesis are FSH dependent. The proposed mechanism of action implicates down-regulation of FSH receptor expression or decrease in adenylate cyclase activity (Otsuka et al. 2001a,b). In contrast, we have recently demonstrated that BMP-4, a known ligand of Alk6, inhibits progesterone secretion by ovine GCs in the absence of FSH (Mulsant et al. 2001, Fabre et al. 2003). However, the precise intracellular mechanism that underlies the inhibiting action of BMP-4 has not been determined.
In the present study, we have investigated the mechanism of action by which BMP-4 exerts an inhibitory action on basal as well as FSH-induced progesterone secretion through modulation of the cAMP signalling pathway and expression of genes involved in steroidogenesis. We propose that BMP-4 modulates progesterone by inhibiting the steroidogenic factor-1 (SF-1) transcriptional activity on steroidogenic gene promoters. In FSH-induced conditions, this mechanism might be reinforced by an inhibition of adenylate cyclase activity.
|
Materials and methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and methodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Fluorogestone acetate sponges used to synchronize oestrous cycles were obtained from Intervet (Angers, France). Porcine FSH (pFSH) from pituitary extracts (pFSH activity=1.15 times the activity of NIH pFSH-P1) used for injections to animals was obtained from Dr Y Combarnous (Nouzilly, France). Purified ovine FSH-20 (oFSH) (lot no. AFP-7028D; 4453 IU/mg; FSH activity=175 times the activity of oFSH-S1) used for culture treatment was a gift from the NIDDK (National Hormone Pituitary Program, Bethesda, MD, USA). Recombinant human FSH (rhFSH) used in adenylate cyclase activity experiments was obtained from Serono (Boulogne, France). Recombinant human BMP-4 was obtained from R&D Systems Europe (Lille, France). Dibutyryl-cyclicAMP (db-cAMP) and isobutyl methylxanthine (IBMX) were purchased from Sigma (L’Isle d’Abeau Chesnes, France). Rabbit polyclonal anti-Smad1 and anti-phospho-Smad1 were obtained from Upstate Biotechnology (Euromedex, Mundolsheim, France). Rabbit polyclonal anti-P450 scc antibody was purchased from Chemicon (Euromedex, Mundolsheim, France). Rabbit polyclonal antibody raised against human placental 3ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (3ß-HSD) and mouse steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) were kindly provided by Dr V Luu-The (Quebec, Canada) and Dr D B Hales (Chicago, IL, USA) respectively.
Plasmid designated pSG-SF1, constructed by inserting cDNA encoding the murine SF-1 into pSG5 vector (Stratagene, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) and pGL3 TkLHß, a luciferase reporter gene under the control of two copies of the SF-1-responsive element of the luteinizing hormone (LH)-ß promoter gene, were a gift from Dr A Martinez (Val et al. 2003). Plasmid pf-Smad1, constructed by inserting a flag-tagged murine Smad1 into pcdef3 vector was kindly provided by Dr M Kawabata (Ishida et al. 2000). Plasmid Gal4-tk80-luc was a luciferase reporter gene under the control of the Gal4-responsive element and plasmid pGal4-Smad1 was a human Smad1 sequence fused with the DNA-binding domain of Gal4 (Pearson et al. 1999). P450 scc luciferase reporter constructs containing fragments of the human P450 scc gene spanning from nucleotides –110 to +49, with or without the mutated SF-1-binding site, subcloned in pGL3 vector, were kindly provided by Dr B Staels (Gizard et al. 2002). StAR luciferase reporter construct containing fragments of human StAR gene spanning nucleotides –235 to +39 was a gift from Dr J Strauss (Sugawara et al. 1996). The cAMP-sensitive reporter construct of the somatostatin gene promoter (pSOM-luc) was kindly provided by Dr B Peers (Liège, Belgium).
Animals
Fifty adult cyclic Romanov ewes were treated with intravaginal sponges impregnated with progestagen (fluorogestone acetate, 40 mg) for 15 days to mimic a luteal phase. Ovaries were collected from animals in the luteal phase of the oestrous cycle (10 days after sponge removal), stimulated by intramuscular injections of 6 IU and 5 IU pFSH administered 24 h and 12 h prior to slaughter respectively. All procedures were approved by the Agricultural and Scientific Research Government committees in accordance with the guidelines for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Agricultural Research and Teaching (approval A37801 [GenBank] ).
Isolation and culture of GCs
Briefly, in each independent culture experiment, ovarian follicles from three to four Romanov ewes were quickly dissected, pooled and classified according to size. GCs were recovered from small antral follicles (1–3 mm in diameter) as previously described (Le Bellego et al. 2002). For progesterone and cAMP production, GC suspensions were seeded at 100 000 viable cells/well in 96-well plates and cultured for 144 h at 37 °C with 5% CO2 in serum-free McCoy’s 5a medium (Sigma) according to a previously described method (Campbell et al. 1996). Cultures were performed with or without different exogenous factors (BMP-4, oFSH, db-cAMP or IBMX), each alone or in combination. Each combination of treatments was tested in triplicate in at least four independent culture experiments. Culture media were partially replaced (180 over 250 µl) at 72 h. Media conditioned between 72 and 144 h of culture were collected at 144 h and stored at –20 °C prior to radioimmunoassays. At the end of the culture, the number of cells per well was estimated after trypsinization by counting an aliquot of each resulting cell suspension with a haemacytometer under a phase contrast microscope.
Alternatively, for phospho-Smad1 detection or transient transfection experiments, GCs were cultured in McCoy’s 5a medium supplemented with 3% fetal ovine serum during the 72 h prior to specific treatments.
Northern blot analysis
For RNA blot analysis, GCs were harvested 72 h after treatment with oFSH (5 ng/ml) or BMP-4 (50 ng/ml) alone or in combination, and total RNAs were isolated using Rnable solution (Euro-bio, Les Ulis, France). Twenty micrograms of total RNAs were separated by denaturing formaldehyde electrophoresis, then transferred to a nylon membrane by capillary action overnight and immobilized by exposure to u.v. light. Blots were prehybridized for 2 h at 42 °C in a buffer containing 50% formamide, 5xDenhardt’s, 1% SDS, 5xSSC and 100µg/ml denatured salmon sperm. The probes were labelled using the Rediprime labelling kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Orsay, France). cDNA probes for ovine StAR, P450 scc and 3ß-HSD were generated by RT-PCR on ovine whole follicle mRNA using the following primers: StAR sense 5'-GGTGCT GAGTAAAGTGATCC-3' and StAR antisense 5'-CATCTCCTCGTAGAGTGTGG-3'; P450 scc sense 5'-CTCTTTAAGTTCGAGGGATC-3' and P450 scc antisense 5'-TCACTTTCAGGGTAT CTCTG-3'; 3ß-HSD sense 5'-CACATTCTGGC CTTGAGGGC-3' and 3ß-HSD antisense 5'-CAG GAAGCCAAGCAGAAAAC-3'. The radioactivity was quantified using a STORM apparatus and ImageQuant software (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The integrity and the quantification of different transcripts were assessed using the human RNA 18S probe as a control (Ambion, Huntingdon, Cambs, UK).
Western blot analysis
GC whole cell extracts were obtained by resuspension in lysis buffer (10 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA and 0.5% Igepal) containing several protease inhibitors (2 mM phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride, 10 mg/ml leupeptin and 10 mg/ml aprotinin) and phosphatase inhibitors (100 mM sodium fluoride, 10 mM sodium pyrophosphate and 2 mM sodium orthovanadate (Sigma)). Lysates were centrifuged at 15 000 g for 20 min at 4 °C, and the protein concentration in the supernatants was determined by a colorimetric assay (BC Assay kit; Uptima Interchim, Montluçon, France). The protein samples (30–60 µg) were fractionated using SDS-PAGE in 12% polyacrylamide gels and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Schleicher & Schuell, Ecquevilly, France). For steroidogenic protein detection, GCs were harvested after 144 h of treatment with FSH and/or BMP-4 in serum-free condition. The same samples were run and transferred on three independent membranes to allow individual detection of P450 scc and 3ß-HSD and dual detection on the same membrane of StAR and actin was used as a loading control. Proteins of the steroidogenic pathway were detected using rabbit polyclonal antibodies raised against StAR (1:500 final dilution), P450 scc (1:1000) and 3ß-HSD (1:500). Actin was revealed using a mouse monoclonal anti-actin antibody (1:1000; Sigma). For Smad1 detection, GCs were cultured for 72 h in McCoy’s 5a medium supplemented with 3% fetal ovine serum (500 000 cells/well; 6-well plate), then harvested after 48 h in serum-free condition before a 30-min stimulation with BMP-4 (50 ng/ml). Incubation with rabbit polyclonal or mouse monoclonal primary antibodies was followed by incubation with peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (1:20 000; Uptima Interchim) or with peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (1:20 000; Bio-Rad, Marnes-la-Coquette, France) respectively. Finally, the protein bands were detected using ECL detection reagents (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
Assessment of progesterone and cAMP production
The amount of progesterone (ng/50 000 cells) in the culture media conditioned between 72 and 144 h from each experiment was measured by radioimmunoassay as previously described (Saumande 1991).
For cAMP measurement, GCs from small antral follicles were cultured for 144 h with or without BMP-4 (50 ng/ml). At the end of the culture, media were removed and cells were stimulated for 2 h with 0.2 mM IBMX in the presence or absence of 50 ng/ml rhFSH in fresh McCoy’s 5a medium. Extracellular amounts of cAMP (pmol/50 000 cells) in the media conditioned during these last 2 h were measured using the cAMP radioimmunoassay kit (Perkin Elmer, Courtaboeuf, France) following the manufacturer’s specifications. IBMX treatment was used to prevent the metabolic effect of phosphodi-esterase on cAMP and then cAMP production was a direct measurement to adenylate cyclase activity.
Transient transfection and luciferase assay
GCs from small antral follicles were seeded at 200 000 cells/well in 12-well plates and cultured for 72 h in McCoy’s 5a medium supplemented with 3% fetal ovine serum. Then, the different plasmids expressing Smad1 or SF-1 (500 ng/well) and luciferase reporter genes for Smad1 or SF-1 activity (1µg/well) were transiently transfected to cells using DAC30 transfection reagent (Eurogentec, Seraing, Belgium) for 24 h with a DNA/DAC30 ratio of 1/2 (w/w) as specified by the manufacturer. After 24 h, media were changed with fresh McCoy’s 5a medium supplemented with 3% fetal ovine serum cells for an extra 24 h with or without BMP-4 (50 ng/ml) before luciferase assay (Promega, Charbonnières, France). Each combination of plasmids was tested in triplicate in each culture and in four independent experiments.
Data analysis
All experimental data are presented as means ±S.E.M. The effects of hormones on progesterone secretion and cAMP production were analyzed using two-way ANOVA in order to appreciate the ‘hormone effect’ as well as the ‘culture effect’. For luciferase assays, data are expressed as relative to control condition. The effect of different combinations of plasmids was assessed by two-way ANOVA to allow for ‘experiment effect’ and ‘plasmid effect’ or ‘BMP-4 effect’. One-way ANOVA was used to appreciate the treatment effect on Northern blot analysis. Post-hoc comparisons were performed with Scheffe’s and Newman–Keuls tests. For all analyses, differences with P>0.05 were considered as not significant.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and methodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
As shown in Fig. 1
, basal progesterone production between 72 and 144 h of culture was decreased by 57% (P<0.001) by BMP-4. As expected, treatment with oFSH (0.5–50 ng/ml) dose-dependently increased progesterone production by GCs. In these FSH-stimulated conditions, the addition of BMP-4 totally abolished oFSH action (P<0.001). The same results were observed with GCs from preovulatory follicles (5–6 mm in diameter) (data not shown).
|
In order to understand the inhibiting role of BMP-4 on GC progesterone production, we have studied the expression of genes implicated in progesterone synthesis, StAR, P450 scc and 3ß-HSD, at mRNA and protein levels (Fig. 2). Northern blot analysis (Fig. 2A) showed a consistent decrease in StAR mRNA level after 72 h of BMP-4 treatment (50 ng/ml) in both basal (P<0.05) and FSH-induced condition (P<0.01). Moreover, BMP-4 led to a decrease in P450 scc mRNA levels in FSH-induced condition only (P<0.05). In contrast, the 3ß-HSD mRNA level was not clearly affected. This pattern of regulation on StAR, P450 scc and 3ß-HSD mRNAs at 72 h was well correlated with the results observed for protein levels at 144 h, as shown by Western blotting analysis (Fig. 2B).
|
The inhibitory effect of BMP-4 was investigated on the cAMP signalling pathway, a well-known regulator of steroidogenesis in GCs. After 144 h of culture, basal cAMP production of GCs, measured in the presence of IBMX, was not affected by BMP-4 treatment. In contrast, rhFSH-stimulated (50 ng/ml) cAMP production at the end of the culture was significantly reduced (50%) by the presence of BMP-4 during the culture (P<0.001; Fig. 3 left-hand panel). Moreover, BMP-4 strongly inhibited db-cAMP or IBMX stimulation of progesterone secretion (Fig. 3 right-hand panel). Together, these results indicated that BMP-4 could act negatively on both pre- and post-cAMP signalling events.
|
Since basal and cAMP-dependent StAR, P450 scc and 3ß-HSD gene expression are regulated by a common transcription factor, SF-1 (Leers-Sucheta et al. 1997, Liu & Simpson 1997, Sugawara et al. 1997), we next investigated the effect of BMP-4, through its signalling intermediary Smad1 (Heldin et al. 1997), on SF-1 transcriptional activity.
First, we checked the ability of BMP-4 to trigger the phosphorylation and the functional activation of Smad1 in ovine GCs in culture (Fig. 4). As shown in Fig. 4A, BMP-4 treatment for 30 min was able to phosphorylate Smad1. We investigated the transcriptional activity of overexpressed Smad1 protein fused to the Gal4-DNA-binding domain on the Gal4-responsive element driving the luciferase gene. Stimulation with BMP-4 for 24 h strongly increased Smad1-dependent luciferase activity (Fig. 4B). These results indicated that Smad1, like other cell types, could act as an effector of BMP-4 action in ovine GCs.
|
). Transient transfection experiments on ovine GCs showed that the SF-1-responsive construct pGL3 TkLHß (Fig. 5A) activity was enhanced (4.5-fold, P<0.001) by overexpression of SF-1. This stimulatory effect was lowered by BMP-4 treatment (P<0.01) or Smad1 expression (P<0.001) and totally abolished by Smad1 expression and BMP-4 treatment. In contrast, the transcriptional activity of CREB (another cAMP-dependent factor implicated in steroidogenic gene regulation), checked by the pSOM-luc construct (Fig. 5B) was not altered by overexpression of Smad-1. Thus, it appears that Smad-1 was able to specifically suppress SF-1 activity on SF-1 responsive elements.
|
). Overexpression of SF-1 enhanced P450 scc and StAR promoter activity and these stimulations were reduced by Smad1 co-expression (P<0.001). Interestingly, basal activity of the P450 scc promoter was significantly reduced by Smad1 overexpression (P<0.05), suggesting a possible direct negative action of Smad1 on the P450 scc promoter (Fig. 5C). The mutant P450 scc promoter in which the SF-1 binding site has been disrupted exhibited a great decrease in basal activity in comparison with the wild-type promoter and was not sensitive to SF-1 overexpression. On this mutant promoter, the Smad1 inhibitory action was minimized but not totally abolished (P<0.05). |
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and methodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
The objective of the present study was to explore the molecular basis by which BMP-4 exerted its inhibitory action on ovine GC basal and FSH-stimulated progesterone synthesis. First, BMP-4 reduced basal and/or FSH-induced increases in mRNA and the protein levels of StAR and P450 scc, a finding consistent with the decrease in progesterone production. Secondly, BMP-4 exerted its inhibitory effect mainly downstream of cAMP signalling and to a lesser extent by decreasing FSH-dependent cAMP production. Thirdly, BMP-4 was able to activate the Smad1 signalling pathway in primary ovine GCs. Fourthly, Smad1 was able to inhibit the transcriptional activity of SF-1 on the LHß promoter as well as on the StAR and P450 scc promoter. Based on these findings, we propose that part of the negative action of BMP-4 on progesterone secretion by ovine GCs would be exerted through the activation of Smad1 that would inhibit the SF-1-dependent expression of StAR and P450 scc genes, leading to a decrease in progesterone synthesis activity. In FSH-stimulated condition, this inhibitory mechanism would be reinforced by a decrease in FSH-dependent cAMP production.
In order to appreciate the regulation of progesterone production, we examined the steady-state level of mRNA for StAR, P450 scc and 3ß-HSD genes implicated in the progesterone synthesis pathway. As observed in other species (Urban et al. 1991, Pescador et al. 1997, Eimerl & Orly 2002), mRNA levels of StAR, P450 scc and, to a lesser extent, 3ß-HSD increased under FSH treatment. This up-regulation at the mRNA level was followed by the same regulation at the protein level. FSH-induced expression of StAR and P450 scc mRNAs and proteins was clearly down-regulated by BMP-4. These results are in agreement with those observed on FSH-stimulated rat GCs using BMP-15, BMP-6 or BMP-7, even if BMP-7 seems to inhibit only StAR mRNA without affecting P450 scc (Lee et al. 2001, Otsuka et al. 2001a,b).
Since StAR, P450 scc and 3ß-HSD are cAMP/protein kinase A (PKA)-regulated genes (Lauber et al. 1993, Sugawara et al. 1997, Rodway et al. 1999), we have focused on the BMP-4 regulation of this signalling pathway. BMP-4 was able to inhibit the FSH-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity of GCs, as measured by cAMP production in the presence of IBMX. This result indicates a regulation of the cAMP signalling pathway by BMP-4 upstream of cAMP as previously observed for BMP-15 and BMP-6 in rat GCs (Otsuka et al. 2001a, b). BMP-15 and BMP-6 have been shown to inhibit FSH-stimulated progesterone production by two different mechanisms implying down-regulation of the FSH receptor expression and inhibition of adenylate cyclase activity respectively. Using RT-PCR, we were unable to demonstrate any down-regulation of FSH receptor expression by BMP-4 in ovine GCs (data not shown). In the absence of FSH, BMP-4 was without effect on cAMP production while it inhibited progesterone synthesis, supporting the hypothesis that BMP-4 is also acting downstream of cAMP. The strong inhibitory effect of BMP-4 observed on cAMP-stimulated progesterone secretion also argues in favour of this hypothesis.
Most of the transforming growth factor-ß/BMP effects at the cellular level are triggered by Smad-related factors. Among the Smad family members, Smad1 is considered to be a BMP-responsive Smad, because most BMPs identified to date, including BMP-2, -4, -6, -7 and -15, have been shown to activate the Smad1 pathway in different cell types (Candia et al. 1997, Yamamoto et al. 1997, Macias-Silva et al. 1998, Henningfeld et al. 2000, Moore et al. 2003). Based on this fact, we investigated whether BMP-4 activates the Smad1 pathway in primary ovine GCs. Treatment of cells with BMP-4 caused a clear increase (i) in the level of phosphorylated Smad1 as determined by immunoblotting and (ii) in Smad1 transcriptional ability as shown by transient tranfection experiments. Hence Smad1 can transduce the BMP-4 signal in ovine GCs. Although the Smad pathway is the main canonical pathway for BMP ligands, there is much evidence on the activation of alternative pathways, particularly the p38 kinase of the MAPK family in various cell types (for a review see Nohe et al. 2004). In agreement, we have observed a weak increase in phosphorylated p38 MAPK under BMP-4 treatment in ovine GCs (Pierre et al. 2002). However, the inhibition of p38 phosphorylation in vitro by a specific inhibitor (SB203580) had no effect on BMP-4 suppression of progesterone production (A Pierre, unpublished data), suggesting that activation of the p38 MAPK pathway by BMP-4 cannot be implicated in the mechanism of progesterone inhibition.
The ability of BMP-4 to regulate post-cAMP steps and to activate the Smad1 factor led us to hypothesize the existence of functional interactions between the transcription factors of these two pathways in the regulation of steroidogenic gene expression. To date, no Smad binding element (SBE) has been described on the regulatory region of StAR or P450 scc or 3ß-HSD genes. Our present transient transfection experiments did not detect any effect of Smad1 on the basal activity of the human StAR proximal promoter. In contrast, basal activity of the P450 scc proximal promoter appeared to be sensitive to Smad1 overexpression even in the context of a disrupted SF-1-binding site, indicating a possible direct inhibitory action of Smad1 on the P450 scc promoter. Alternatively, cAMP/PKA-activated transcription factors such as CREB and SP-1, known to regulate genes of the steroidogenic pathway (Mukherjee et al. 1996, Leers-Sucheta et al. 1997, Liu & Simpson 1997, Sugawara et al. 2000) have also been shown to functionally interact with Smad factors. Indeed, Warner et al.(2003) recently demonstrated that phosphorylated CREB could be associated through the CREB-binding protein (CBP) with a Smad2 SBE-bound transcriptional complex. Moreover, SP-1 can co-operate with Smad3 to regulate the 
2(I) collagen promoter gene (Poncelet & Schnaper 2001) and with Smad2, 3 and 4 to control the promoter of the p15Ink4B gene (Feng et al. 2000). Nevertheless, FSH-activated CREB did not cooperate with Smad1 to drive the CREB-dependent somatostatin promoter gene in our transient transfection experiments with ovine GCs. In contrast, we have clearly demonstrated that the transcriptional activity of SF-1, another factor implicated in basal as well as in cAMP-induced regulation of steroidogenic genes (Liu & Simpson 1997, Sugawara et al. 1997), was altered by Smad1. This is the first demonstration of a functional negative crosstalk between Smad factors and SF-1 in any cell type. Such a negative alteration of a transcription factor activity by Smad factors has been described only for the nuclear factor 
B (NFB) (DiChiara et al. 2000). The inhibitory mechanism implies a competitive interaction between Smad2 and NFB mediated by the transcriptional coactivator CBP, without Smad2/NFB direct interaction. Of note, in our model, co-immunoprecipitation experiments with overex-pressed Smad1 and SF-1 failed to detect any direct interaction between Smad1 and SF-1 (A Pierre, data not shown). Hence, one can hypothesize about the possible implication of an intermediary factor such CBP, known to interact with Smad factors (Pouponnot et al. 1998) and SF-1 (Monte et al. 1998). Further experiments are needed to validate this hypothesis on the inhibitory mechanism of Smad1 on SF-1 in the context of GCs, and to study the mechanism that underlies this inhibition.
Nevertheless, the inhibiting action of Smad1 on SF-1, checked by the SF-1 responsive element of the LHß subunit promoter gene, occurs also on the SF-1-dependent response of human StAR and P450 scc promoter constructs. These results need to be considered together with the observed inhibition of StAR and P450 scc mRNA expression by BMP-4. Therefore, one may hypothesize that part of the BMP-4-induced inhibition of StAR and P450 scc genes expression, and ultimately progesterone secretion, would pass through a Smad1-dependent inhibition of SF-1 activity. Since SF-1 is a key regulator of GC differentiation, our present data reinforce the hypothesis that BMP factors control ovarian follicle development in delaying GC differentiation.
|
Acknowledgements |
|---|
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and methodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Candia AF, Watabe T, Hawley SH, Onichtchouk D, Zhang Y, Derynck R, Niehrs C & Cho KW 1997 Cellular interpretation of multiple TGF-beta signals: intracellular antagonism between activin/BVg1 and BMP-2/4 signaling mediated by Smads. Development 124 4467–4480.[Abstract]
DiChiara MR, Kiely JM, Gimbrone MA Jr, Lee ME, Perrella MA & Topper JN 2000 Inhibition of E-selectin gene expression by transforming growth factor beta in endothelial cells involves coactivator integration of Smad and nuclear factor kappaB-mediated signals. Journal of Experimental Medicine 192 695–704.
Dong J, Albertini DF, Nishimori K, Kumar TR, Lu N & Matzuk MM 1996 Growth differentiation factor-9 is required during early ovarian folliculogenesis. Nature 383 531–535.[CrossRef][Medline]
Drummond AE, Le MT, Ethier JF, Dyson M & Findlay JK 2002 Expression and localization of activin receptors, Smads, and beta glycan to the postnatal rat ovary. Endocrinology 143 1423–1433.
Eimerl S & Orly J 2002 Regulation of steroidogenic genes by insulin-like growth factor-1 and follicle-stimulating hormone: differential responses of cytochrome P450 side-chain cleavage, steroidogenic acute regulatory protein, and 3 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase/isomerase in rat granulosa cells. Biology of Reproduction 67 900–910.
Elvin JA, Yan C & Matzuk MM 2000 Oocyte-expressed TGF-beta superfamily members in female fertility. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 159 1–5.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Fabre S, Pierre A, Pisselet C, Mulsant P, Lecerf F, Pohl J, Monget P & Monniaux D 2003 The Booroola mutation in sheep is associated with an alteration of the bone morphogenetic protein receptor-IB functionality. Journal of Endocrinology 177 435–444.[Abstract]
Feng XH, Lin X & Derynck R 2000 Smad2, Smad3 and Smad4 cooperate with Sp1 to induce p15(Ink4B) transcription in response to TGF-beta. EMBO Journal 19 5178–5193.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Galloway SM, McNatty KP, Cambridge LM, Laitinen MP, Juengel JL, Jokiranta TS, McLaren RJ, Luiro K, Dodds KG, Montgomery GW, Beattie AE, Davis GH & Ritvos O 2000 Mutations in an oocyte-derived growth factor gene (BMP15) cause increased ovulation rate and infertility in a dosage-sensitive manner. Nature Genetics 25 279–283.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Gizard F, Lavallee B, DeWitte F, Teissier E, Staels B & Hum DW 2002 The transcriptional regulating protein of 132 kDa (TReP-132) enhances P450 scc gene transcription through interaction with steroidogenic factor-1 in human adrenal cells. Journal of Biological Chemistry 277 39144–39155.
Hanrahan JP, Gregan SM, Mulsant P, Mullen M, Davis GH, Powell R & Galloway SM 2004 Mutations in the genes for oocyte-derived growth factors GDF9 and BMP15 are associated with both increased ovulation rate and sterility in Cambridge and Belclare sheep (Ovis aries). Biology of Reproduction 70 900–909.
Heldin CH, Miyazono K & ten Dijke P 1997 TGF-beta signalling from cell membrane to nucleus through SMAD proteins. Nature 390 465–471.[CrossRef][Medline]
Henningfeld KA, Rastegar S, Adler G & Knochel W 2000 Smad1 and Smad4 are components of the bone morphogenetic protein-4 (BMP-4)-induced transcription complex of the Xvent-2B promoter. Journal of Biological Chemistry 275 21827–21835.
Ishida W, Hamamoto T, Kusanagi K, Yagi K, Kawabata M, Takehara K, Sampath TK, Kato M & Miyazono K 2000 Smad6 is a Smad1/5-induced smad inhibitor. Characterization of bone morphogenetic protein-responsive element in the mouse Smad6 promoter. Journal of Biological Chemistry 275 6075–6079.
Khamsi F, Roberge S, Yavas Y, Lacanna IC, Zhu X & Wong J 2001 Recent discoveries in physiology of insulin-like growth factor-1 and its interaction with gonadotropins in folliculogenesis. Endocrine 16 151–165.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lauber ME, Kagawa N, Waterman MR & Simpson ER 1993 cAMP-dependent and tissue-specific expression of genes encoding steroidogenic enzymes in bovine luteal and granulosa cells in primary culture. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 93 227–233.[CrossRef][Medline]
Le Bellego F, Pisselet C, Huet C, Monget P & Monniaux D 2002 Laminin-6ß1 integrin interaction enhances survival and proliferation and modulates steroidogenesis of ovine granulosa cells. Journal of Endocrinology 172 45–59.[Abstract]
Lee WS, Otsuka F, Moore RK & Shimasaki S 2001 Effect of bone morphogenetic protein-7 on folliculogenesis and ovulation in the rat. Biology of Reproduction 65 994–999.
Leers-Sucheta S, Morohashi K, Mason JI & Melner MH 1997 Synergistic activation of the human type II 3 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase/delta5-delta4 isomerase promoter by the transcription factor steroidogenic factor-1/adrenal 4-binding protein and phorbol ester. Journal of Biological Chemistry 272 7960–7967.
Liu Z & Simpson ER 1997 Steroidogenic factor 1 (SF-1) and SP1 are required for regulation of bovine CYP11A gene expression in bovine luteal cells and adrenal Y1 cells. Molecular Endocrinology 11 127–137.
Macias-Silva M, Hoodless PA, Tang SJ, Buchwald M & Wrana JL 1998 Specific activation of Smad1 signaling pathways by the BMP7 type I receptor, ALK2. Journal of Biological Chemistry 273 25628–25636.
Monget P, Fabre S, Mulsant P, Lecerf F, Elsen JM, Mazerbourg S, Pisselet C & Monniaux D 2002 Regulation of ovarian folliculogenesis by IGF and BMP system in domestic animals. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 23 139–154.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Monte D, DeWitte F & Hum DW 1998 Regulation of the human P450 scc gene by steroidogenic factor 1 is mediated by CBP/p300. Journal of Biological Chemistry 273 4585–4591.
Moore RK, Otsuka F & Shimasaki S 2003 Molecular basis of bone morphogenetic protein-15 signaling in granulosa cells. Journal of Biological Chemistry 278 304–310.
Mukherjee A, Park-Sarge OK & Mayo KE 1996 Gonadotropins induce rapid phosphorylation of the 3',5'-cyclic adenosine monophosphate response element binding protein in ovarian granulosa cells. Endocrinology 137 3234–3245.[Abstract]
Mulsant P, Lecerf F, Fabre S, Schibler L, Monget P, Lanneluc I, Pisselet C, Riquet J, Monniaux D, Callebaut I, Cribiu E, Thimonier J, Teyssier J, Bodin L, Cognie Y, Chitour N & Elsen JM 2001 Mutation in bone morphogenetic protein receptor-IB is associated with increased ovulation rate in Booroola merino ewes. PNAS 98 5104–5109.
Nohe A, Keating E, Knaus P & Petersen NO 2004 Signal transduction of bone morphogenetic protein receptors. Cellular Signalling 16 291–299.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Otsuka F, Yao Z, Lee T, Yamamoto S, Erickson GF & Shimasaki S 2000 Bone morphogenetic protein-15. Identification of target cells and biological functions. Journal of Biological Chemistry 275 39523–39528.
Otsuka F, Moore RK & Shimasaki S 2001a Biological function and cellular mechanism of bone morphogenetic protein-6 in the ovary. Journal of Biological Chemistry 276 32889–32895.
Otsuka F, Yamamoto S, Erickson GF & Shimasaki S 2001b Bone morphogenetic protein-15 inhibits follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) action by suppressing FSH receptor expression. Journal of Biological Chemistry 276 11387–11392.
Pearson KL, Hunter T & Janknecht R 1999 Activation of Smad1-mediated transcription by p300/CBP. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1489 354–364.[Medline]
Pescador N, Houde A, Stocco DM & Murphy BD 1997 Follicle-stimulating hormone and intracellular second messengers regulate steroidogenic acute regulatory protein messenger ribonucleic acid in luteinized porcine granulosa cells. Biology of Reproduction 57 660–668.[Abstract]
Pierre A, Fabre S, Pisselet C, Monniaux D & Monget P 2002 Rôle des bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) dans la fonction ovarienne chez la brebis. Annals of Endocrinology 63 114.
Poncelet AC & Schnaper HW 2001 Sp1 and Smad proteins cooperate to mediate transforming growth factor-beta 1-induced alpha 2(I) collagen expression in human glomerular mesangial cells. Journal of Biological Chemistry 276 6983–6992.
Pouponnot C, Jayaraman L & Massague J 1998 Physical and functional interaction of SMADs and p300/CBP. Journal of Biological Chemistry 273 22865–22868.
Richards JS & Hedin L 1988 Molecular aspects of hormone action in ovarian follicular development, ovulation, and luteinization. Annual Review of Physiology 50 441–463.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Rodway MR, Swan CL, Gillio-Meina C, Crellin NK, Flood PF & Chedrese PJ 1999 Regulation of steroidogenesis in jc-410, a stable cell line of porcine granulosa origin. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 148 87–94.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Saumande J 1991 Culture of bovine granulosa cells in a chemically defined serum-free medium: the effect of insulin and fibronectin on the response to FSH. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 38 189–196.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Shimasaki S, Zachow RJ, Li D, Kim H, Iemura S, Ueno N, Sampath K, Chang RJ & Erickson GF 1999 A functional bone morphogenetic protein system in the ovary. PNAS 96 7282–7287.
Souza CJ, MacDougall C, Campbell BK, McNeilly AS & Baird DT 2001 The Booroola (FecB) phenotype is associated with a mutation in the bone morphogenetic receptor type 1 B (BMPR1B) gene. Journal of Endocrinology 169 R1–R6.[Abstract]
Souza CJ, Campbell BK, McNeilly AS & Baird DT 2002 Effect of bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2) on oestradiol and inhibin A production by sheep granulosa cells, and localization of BMP receptors in the ovary by immunohistochemistry. Reproduction 123 363–369.[Abstract]
Sugawara T, Holt JA, Kiriakidou M & Strauss JF 3rd 1996 Steroidogenic factor 1-dependent promoter activity of the human steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) gene. Biochemistry 35 9052–9059.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sugawara T, Kiriakidou M, McAllister JM, Kallen CB & Strauss JF 3rd 1997 Multiple steroidogenic factor 1 binding elements in the human steroidogenic acute regulatory protein gene 5'-flanking region are required for maximal promoter activity and cyclic AMP responsiveness. Biochemistry 36 7249–7255.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sugawara T, Saito M & Fujimoto S 2000 Sp1 and SF-1 interact and cooperate in the regulation of human steroidogenic acute regulatory protein gene expression. Endocrinology 141 2895–2903.
Urban RJ, Garmey JC, Shupnik MA & Veldhuis JD 1991 Follicle-stimulating hormone increases concentrations of messenger ribonucleic acid encoding cytochrome P450 cholesterol side-chain cleavage enzyme in primary cultures of porcine granulosa cells. Endocrinology 128 2000–2007.
Val P, Lefrancois-Martinez AM, Veyssiere G & Martinez A 2003 SF-1 a key player in the development and differentiation of steroidogenic tissues. Nuclear Receptor 1 8 (url: www.nuclear-receptor.com/content/1/1/8).
Vitt UA, Hayashi M, Klein C & Hsueh AJ 2000 Growth differentiation factor-9 stimulates proliferation but suppresses the follicle-stimulating hormone-induced differentiation of cultured granulosa cells from small antral and preovulatory rat follicles. Biology of Reproduction 62 370–377.
Warner DR, Pisano MM & Greene RM 2003 Nuclear convergence of the TGFbeta and cAMP signal transduction pathways in murine embryonic palate mesenchymal cells. Cellular Signalling 15 235–242.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Wilson T, Wu XY, Juengel JL, Ross IK, Lumsden JM, Lord EA, Dodds KG, Walling GA, McEwan JC, O’Connell AR, McNatty KP & Montgomery GW 2001 Highly prolific Booroola sheep have a mutation in the intracellular kinase domain of bone morphogenetic protein IB receptor (ALK-6) that is expressed in both oocytes and granulosa cells. Biology of Reproduction 64 1225–1235.
Winters TA, Hanten JA & Veldhuis JD 1998 In situ amplification of the cytochrome P-450 cholesterol side-chain cleavage enzyme mRNA in single porcine granulosa cells by IGF-1 and FSH acting alone or in concert. Endocrine 9 57–63.[CrossRef][Medline]
Xu J, Oakley J & McGee EA 2002 Stage-specific expression of Smad2 and Smad3 during folliculogenesis. Biology of Reproduction 66 1571–1578.
Yamamoto N, Akiyama S, Katagiri T, Namiki M, Kurokawa T & Suda T 1997 Smad1 and smad5 act downstream of intracellular signalings of BMP-2 that inhibits myogenic differentiation and induces osteoblast differentiation in C2C12 myoblasts. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 238 574–580.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Received 20 August 2004
Accepted 21 September 2004
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  H. A. LaVoie and S. R. King Transcriptional Regulation of Steroidogenic Genes: STARD1, CYP11A1 and HSD3B Exp Biol Med, August 1, 2009; 234(8): 880 - 907. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S Elis, J Dupont, I Couty, L Persani, M Govoroun, E Blesbois, F Batellier, and P Monget Expression and biological effects of bone morphogenetic protein-15 in the hen ovary J. Endocrinol., September 1, 2007; 194(3): 485 - 497. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. G Knight and C. Glister TGF-{beta} superfamily members and ovarian follicle development. Reproduction, August 1, 2006; 132(2): 191 - 206. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Pannetier, S. Fabre, F. Batista, A. Kocer, L. Renault, G. Jolivet, B. Mandon-Pepin, C. Cotinot, R. Veitia, and E. Pailhoux FOXL2 activates P450 aromatase gene transcription: towards a better characterization of the early steps of mammalian ovarian development. J. Mol. Endocrinol., June 1, 2006; 36(3): 399 - 413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L J Spicer, P Y Aad, D Allen, S Mazerbourg, and A J Hsueh Growth differentiation factor-9 has divergent effects on proliferation and steroidogenesis of bovine granulosa cells. J. Endocrinol., May 1, 2006; 189(2): 329 - 339. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. L Juengel, K. L Reader, A. H Bibby, S. Lun, I. Ross, L. J Haydon, and K. P McNatty The role of bone morphogenetic proteins 2, 4, 6 and 7 during ovarian follicular development in sheep: contrast to rat. Reproduction, March 1, 2006; 131(3): 501 - 513. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Pierre, C. Pisselet, J. Dupont, M. Bontoux, and P. Monget Bone Morphogenetic Protein 5 Expression in the Rat Ovary: Biological Effects on Granulosa Cell Proliferation and Steroidogenesis Biol Reprod, December 1, 2005; 73(6): 1102 - 1108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
