JME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Molecular Endocrinology (2006) 37 163-173    DOI: 10.1677/jme.1.02089
© 2006 Society for Endocrinology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, J.
Right arrow Articles by Geller, D. S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, J.
Right arrow Articles by Geller, D. S

Differential interaction of RU486 with the progesterone and glucocorticoid receptors

Junhui Zhang, Francis T F Tsai1 and David S Geller

Section of Nephrology, Yale University School of Medicine, PO Box 208029, New Haven, Connecticut 06520–8029, USA
1 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030–3498, USA

(Requests for offprints should be addressed to D S Geller; Email: david.geller{at}yale.edu)

Steroid hormone receptor antagonists are widely used in clinical medicine, but their use is often complicated by the lack of receptor specificity to presently available drugs. We previously demonstrated an important role of a widely conserved helix 3 (H3)–helix 5 (H5) interaction in determining the sensitivity and specificity of steroid hormone receptors to receptor agonists. Intriguingly, the same H3 residues also play a crucial role in receptor antagonism; mutation of these residues alters the response of these receptors to antagonists. Given the close interaction of H3 and H5 residues at this site, we asked whether H5 residues might also play a role in the sensitivity of these receptors to antagonists. We demonstrate here that modification of H5 residues produces marked changes in the sensitivities of the glucocorticoid and progesterone receptor (PR) to RU486 antagonism. Moreover, while we confirm previous reports that alteration of the H3 residue, Gly 722 prevents RU486-mediated inhibition of the PR, we show that the corresponding substitution in the glucocorticoid receptor does not inhibit RU486-mediated receptor antagonism. Taken together, our data support the notion that RU486 binds differently to these two receptors, providing a potential target for the design of more specific antiglucocorticoid and antiprogestin drugs.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. Zhang, R. Ge, C. Matte-Martone, J. Goodwin, W. D. Shlomchik, M. J. Mamula, A. Kooshkabadi, M. P. Hardy, and D. Geller
Characterization of a Novel Gain of Function Glucocorticoid Receptor Knock-in Mouse
J. Biol. Chem., March 6, 2009; 284(10): 6249 - 6259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Mol EndocrinolHome page
J. B Pippal and P. J Fuller
Structure-function relationships in the mineralocorticoid receptor
J. Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2008; 41(6): 405 - 413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the Society for Endocrinology.