HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Headey, S. J Articles by Bach, L. A Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Headey, S. J Articles by Bach, L. A

¹ University of Melbourne, Department of Medicine, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg 3084, Australia
² The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville 3050, Australia

(Requests for offprints should be addressed to L A Bach; Email: l.bach{at}unimelb.edu.au)

Insulin-like growth factors IGF-I and IGF -II are important mediators of growth. A family of six high affinity IGF binding proteins (IGFBPs) modulate IGF action. IGFBPs have three domains, of which the N- and C-domains are involved in high affinity IGF binding. IGFBP-6 is unique in its 20–100-fold IGF-II binding specificity over IGF-I. The aim of this study was to determine the contributions of the N- and C-domains of IGFBP-6 to its IGF binding properties. We confirmed that differential dissociation kinetics are responsible for the IGF-II binding preference of IGFBP-6. The N-domain has rapid association kinetics, similar to full-length IGFBP-6, but both IGF-I and -II dissociate rapidly from this domain, thereby reducing its binding affinity for IGF-II ~50-fold. However, the N-domain binds IGF-I and -II with similar affinities and it has a similar IGF-I binding affinity to full-length IGFBP-6. This suggests that the C-domain confers the IGF-II binding preference of IGFBP-6; indeed, IGF-I bound inconsistently with very low affinity to the C-domain. Coincubation studies showed that isolated N- and C-domains of IGFBP-6 do not strongly cooperate to enhance IGF binding. The results of the binding studies are supported by the effects of the IGFBP-6 domains on IGF-induced colon cancer cell proliferation; the N-domain inhibited IGF-II induced proliferation with ~20-fold lower potency than IGFBP-6 and it was equipotent in inhibiting IGF-I- and IGF-II-induced proliferation. Coincubation of C-domain had no additional effect on N-domain-induced inhibition of proliferation. In conclusion, both the N- and C-domains of IGFBP-6 are involved in IGF binding, the C-domain is responsible for the IGF-II binding preference of IGFBP-6 and intact IGFBP-6 is necessary for high affinity IGF binding.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Fu, J. A. Thompson, and L. A. Bach Promotion of Cancer Cell Migration: AN INSULIN-LIKE GROWTH FACTOR (IGF)-INDEPENDENT ACTION OF IGF-BINDING PROTEIN-6 J. Biol. Chem., August 3, 2007; 282(31): 22298 - 22306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Sitar, G. M. Popowicz, I. Siwanowicz, R. Huber, and T. A. Holak Structural basis for the inhibition of insulin-like growth factors by insulin-like growth factor-binding proteins PNAS, August 29, 2006; 103(35): 13028 - 13033. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]