JME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Molecular Endocrinology (1997) 18, 147-160    DOI: 10.1677/jme.0.0180147
© 1997 Society for Endocrinology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vivat, V
Right arrow Articles by Gronemeyer, H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vivat, V
Right arrow Articles by Gronemeyer, H

Sequences in the ligand-binding domains of the human androgen and progesterone receptors which determine their distinct ligand identities

V Vivat, D Gofflo, T Garcia, J-M Wurtz, W Bourguet, D Philibert and H Gronemeyer

The natural ligands of the progesterone (PR) and androgen (AR) receptors, progesterone and testosterone, differ only by their 17β-substitution. To identify within the AR and PR ligand-binding domains (LBDs) the sequences responsible for the differential recognition of these ligands, chimeric LBDs assembled from five homologous AR/PR 'cassettes' linked to the GAL4-DNA binding domain were constructed, and their ligand binding and transactivation characteristics were determined. Replacing the central cassette 3 of PR by that of AR generated a progesterone- and testosterone-responsive PR LBD with the AR residues 788-RHLS-791 being specifically involved in testosterone recognition, while the introduction of the C-terminal PR cassette 5 into AR conferred progestin responsiveness onto the AR LBD. These results suggest that residues within AR 788-RHLS-791 interact with the testosterone 17β-OH, while PR cassette 5 apparently contains the amino acid(s) specifically involved in the recognition of the progesterone 17β-acetyl group. However, ligand binding and transactivation by these chimeras were significantly decreased compared with those of the parental LBDs, indicating that residues located outside of these cassettes contribute to the proper positioning of the steroids in the AR and PR ligand-binding pockets (LBPs). Indeed, certain AR/PR chimeras acquired efficient ligand binding, but were unable to transactivate, indicating that the ligand was improperly bound in the chimeric LBP and could not induce the conformational changes leading to a transcriptionally competent activation function (AF-2) within the LBD. The properties of the various LBD chimeras are discussed in view of the recently solved three-dimensional structures of the retinoid X receptor {alpha} apo- and retinoic acid receptor {gamma} holo-LBDs.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Mol EndocrinolHome page
J. B Pippal and P. J Fuller
Structure-function relationships in the mineralocorticoid receptor
J. Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2008; 41(6): 405 - 413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
F. M. Rogerson, Y.-Z. Yao, R. E. Elsass, N. Dimopoulos, B. J. Smith, and P. J. Fuller
A Critical Region in the Mineralocorticoid Receptor for Aldosterone Binding and Activation by Cortisol: Evidence for a Common Mechanism Governing Ligand Binding Specificity in Steroid Hormone Receptors
Mol. Endocrinol., April 1, 2007; 21(4): 817 - 828.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. Zhang, J. Simisky, F. T. F. Tsai, and D. S. Geller
A critical role of helix 3-helix 5 interaction in steroid hormone receptor function
PNAS, February 22, 2005; 102(8): 2707 - 2712.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Q. Wang, T. S. Udayakumar, T. S. Vasaitis, A. M. Brodie, and J. D. Fondell
Mechanistic Relationship between Androgen Receptor Polyglutamine Tract Truncation and Androgen-dependent Transcriptional Hyperactivity in Prostate Cancer Cells
J. Biol. Chem., April 23, 2004; 279(17): 17319 - 17328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
J. Sun, J. Baudry, J. A. Katzenellenbogen, and B. S. Katzenellenbogen
Molecular Basis for the Subtype Discrimination of the Estrogen Receptor-{beta}-Selective Ligand, Diarylpropionitrile
Mol. Endocrinol., February 1, 2003; 17(2): 247 - 258.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
C. Robin-Jagerschmidt, J.-M. Wurtz, B. Guillot, D. Gofflo, B. Benhamou, A. Vergezac, C. Ossart, D. Moras, and D. Philibert
Residues in the Ligand Binding Domain That Confer Progestin or Glucocorticoid Specificity and Modulate the Receptor Transactivation Capacity
Mol. Endocrinol., July 1, 2000; 14(7): 1028 - 1037.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
F. M. Rogerson, N. Dimopoulos, P. Sluka, S. Chu, A. J. Curtis, and P. J. Fuller
Structural Determinants of Aldosterone Binding Selectivity in the Mineralocorticoid Receptor
J. Biol. Chem., December 17, 1999; 274(51): 36305 - 36311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Ekena, J. A. Katzenellenbogen, and B. S. Katzenellenbogen
Determinants of Ligand Specificity of Estrogen Receptor-alpha : Estrogen versus Androgen Discrimination
J. Biol. Chem., January 9, 1998; 273(2): 693 - 699.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the Society for Endocrinology.