JME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Molecular Endocrinology (1988) 1, 117-124    DOI: 10.1677/jme.0.0010117
© 1988 Society for Endocrinology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Enyedi, P.
Right arrow Articles by Spät, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Enyedi, P.
Right arrow Articles by Spät, A.

Effect of angiotensin II and arginine vasopressin on aldosterone production and phosphoinositide turnover in rat adrenal glomerulosa cells: a comparative study

P. Enyedi, T. Balla, F. A. Antoni and A. Spät

We have previously shown that arginine vasopressin (AVP) stimulates the production of aldosterone in isolated superfused adrenal glomerulosa cells by a mechanism that involves an increased turnover of phosphoinositides. In the present study we compared the characteristics of AVP- and angiotensin II (AII)-induced changes in phosphoinositide turnover and aldosterone production in the rat. Selected concentrations of the two peptides, which were equipotent in terms of the magnitude of changes induced in phosphoinositide turnover, stimulated aldosterone production to the same extent only in the initial phase of the stimulation. A sustained aldosterone response was only observed in AII-stimulated cells. On the other hand, the AVP-induced increase in incorporation of [32P]phosphate into phosphatidyl-inositol and the stimulation of inositol phosphate production were maintained during incubation. Preincubation of the cells with AVP failed to modify the effects of AII on phosphoinositide breakdown or aldosterone production. These results indicate that desensitization at the level of the receptor or at a post-receptor site is not responsible for the transient character of AVP-induced aldosterone production. Delayed activation of an inhibitory mechanism by AVP can also be excluded. Additivity of the stimulation of the phosphoinositide turnover observed at submaximally, but not maximally, effective concentrations of AII indicates that the two agonists act on the same phosphoinositide pool. We suggest that the sustained steroidogenic effect of AII involves an as yet unidentified mechanism, which is absent when the cells are stimulated with AVP.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
A. SPAT and L. HUNYADY
Control of Aldosterone Secretion: A Model for Convergence in Cellular Signaling Pathways
Physiol Rev, April 1, 2004; 84(2): 489 - 539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the Society for Endocrinology.